Connect with us

World News

How realistic is the plan to build a ‘drone wall’ against Russia?

Published

on


Frank Gardner profile image

Frank GardnerSecurity correspondent

BBC A treated image showing drones with a partial map belowBBC

First comes the warning, that disembodied voice over the tannoy: “Your attention please. Air siren in the city. Please move to the shelter on the minus second floor.” Then comes the mosquito-like whine of the incoming Russian drones, massing in their hundreds just above the clouds.

It’s followed immediately by the rattle of anti-aircraft fire, the distant thud of explosions, then finally the ominous klaxon call of ambulance and fire sirens.

This is the grim reality of night time in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine.

These are attack drones that explode on impact.

Drones are now an integral part of modern warfare, but they are not confined to the battlefield.

Across western Europe, far from Ukraine, unarmed drones have also been found buzzing around airports, military bases and power plants, all part of a suspected programme of “hybrid warfare” being waged by Russia, with some speculating they’re arriving to test the resilience of certain Nato countries that are helping Ukraine.

Reuters An aircraft lands on the tarmac near a "No Drone Zone" placard 
Reuters

Drone sightings around critical infrastructure across Europe, including in Belgium, have sparked fear in a number of Nato countries

Recent drone sightings in Poland, along with a swathe spotted around critical infrastructure across Europe, including in Belgium and Denmark, have sparked fear across some Nato countries.

Now, there is talk that a “drone wall” is to be designed to protect parts of Europe – but just how necessary is this, really? And more pertinently, how realistic?

A wake-up call to Europe

On 9 September, around 20 Russian drones overshot Ukraine and flew into Poland, forcing the closure of four airports.

Nato jets were scrambled and several of the drones were shot down – the rest crashed across Poland, scattering debris in multiple regions.

This was a wake-up call to Europe, marking one of the largest and most serious breaches of Nato airspace since the war in Ukraine began.

Which is why discussion about a possible drone wall seems ever more pressing.

AFP via Getty Images Polish soldiers during a military equipment display 
AFP via Getty Images

On 9 September, around 20 Russian decoy drones flew into Poland

“This momentum really driven by these recent incursions,” explains Katja Bego, senior research fellow in the international security programme at Chatham House think tank.

Drones – or to give them their official title, Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) – have already transformed the battle space.

On the killing fields of eastern Ukraine, they tend to be small short-range ones, typically measuring around just 10 inches, and they carry lethal explosive devices.

But these are not currently the threat to the rest of Europe. It is the larger drones – some of which can potentially fly well over 1,000km – that are fuelling calls for a European drone wall.

Previously Russia imported a type known as Shahed 136 drones from Iran but now it produces its own version: the Geran 2. Some Gerans were among the drones that flew into Poland in September.

A graphic of a Shahed-136 drone, which says the wingspan is about 2.m. It adds they are mainly deployed in swarms, are low-flying, and can reach a maximum distance of about 1,550 miles

So, what, some are now asking, if Russia one day sent over 200 drones? Or, say, 2,000? How would Nato respond – and in fact, could it respond?

After all, deploying fighter jets each time would be expensive. André Rogaczewski, CEO of Netcompany, a Danish IT services firm that builds digital systems for European governments, argues: “[It] is neither effective nor a sensible use of taxpayers’ money.”

A plague of mysterious drones

Ukraine has stepped up its own long-range drone attacks on Russian airports and critical infrastructure like petrochemical plants, bringing the war home to ordinary Russians.

Then there are sea drones: uncrewed vessels that can travel either on or below the surface, as used with devastating effect by Ukraine against Russia’s Black Sea fleet.

But there is something that is in some ways more sinister than clearly identifiable drones used by countries that are openly at war.

That is: the plague of mysterious, anonymous drones that have appeared.

Map of reported drone activity across Europe in 2025 - which includes suspected Russian drone incursion into Poland and those near airports and military bases

Sometimes these turn up in the dead of night, around Europe’s airports, including one in Belgium’s main airport near Brussels earlier this month. There have also been similar sightings in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany and Lithuania.

Unlike the clearly identifiable Russian attack drones in Ukraine, these “civilian drones” in Western Europe have not – so far – been armed with any explosives. But being anonymously launched, it’s hard to prove where they come from or who activated them – or indeed if they are being launched from passing ships.

Suspicions fall on Russia with Western intelligence officials believing Moscow is using proxies to launch these short range drones locally to cause havoc and disruption. The Kremlin denies any responsibility.

Belgium is one significant target, as the home to Nato headquarters, the European Union and Euroclear (the financial clearing house that handles trillions of dollars of international transactions).

AFP via Getty Images Headshot of Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen

AFP via Getty Images

‘From a European perspective, there is only one country… willing to threaten us and that is Russia,’ argued Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in October

There is an ongoing debate around whether Europe should release around €200bn worth of frozen Russian assets, held in Belgium, to help Ukraine. So is it a coincidence that mystery drones have appeared around Brussels and Liege airports, as well as a military base?

The UK has sent a team of counter drone specialists from the RAF Regiment, deployed from RAF Leeming in North Yorkshire, to help bolster Belgium’s defences against the drones.

Still, the mystery drones are worrying: both because of the danger posed to aircraft as they take off and land but also because of the risk of surveillance, especially around military bases and critical infrastructure such as power plants.

Drone wall: why it’s not a silver bullet

The plan for a drone wall is Europe’s response to the threat of cross-border incursions by drones launched specifically from Russia.

The wall has been described as an integrated, coordinated, multi-layered defence system stretching initially from the Baltic states to the Black Sea.

It’s likely to comprise a combination of radars, sensors, jamming and weapons systems to detect incoming drones – and then to track and destroy them.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has said a new anti-drone system should be fully operational by the end of 2027.

Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Remains of Shahed 136 

Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

Russia originally imported a type of drone known as Shahed 136 drones from Iran

Not surprisingly, those countries keenest to see it deployed quickly – including Poland and Finland- are those geographically closest to Russia.

Katja Bego believes it is necessary – and long overdue.

But she adds: “This is not just about drones. There is really not enough in place in terms of more traditional missile defence, air defence, along the Eastern flank borders.”

Nonetheless, a drone wall is not a silver bullet for air defence. And others aren’t convinced it’s entirely realistic.

Robert Tollast, a research fellow at Whitehall think tank The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), argues that the idea of some “sort of impervious wall”, is, in his words, out of the question.

Yet he can still see why there are calls for it and wants to try.

Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Emergency service workers in Ukraine attend a fire at a hangar destroyed by a drone strikeGlobal Images Ukraine via Getty Images

People in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine are facing the consequences of attack drones

“For countries that are close to the Russian border – the Baltics, Poland, Germany as well because of course they’re within range of those long-range drones – it is absolutely essential to try and build something like this,” he says.

“The idea here would be not so much to actually build a full-on wall, or something that’s fully impenetrable”, agrees Ms Bego.

“It’s not really possible – both in terms of the length and also just the available technologies are not 100% foolproof… But rather you’re looking at a combination of things that hopefully can capture different types of drones and stop them.”

Stopping drones: Hard kills vs jamming

Fabian Hinz, a research fellow at The International Institute for Strategic Studies in London describes a whole menu of options to detect drones.

“You can have acoustic detection; airborne radars that can detect low flying targets really well; ground-based radars that have very short ranges against low-flying targets but [that] still work really well against high flying targets.

“You can have optical systems, infrared systems – and once the detection is done you have either soft kill or hard kill.”

Hard kill means destroying the drone, either with gunfire or missiles. Soft kill means making an incoming drone ineffective, usually through electronic means.

EPA/Shutterstock People look at debris of a Russian Geran 2 droneEPA/Shutterstock

People look at debris of a Geran-2, among destroyed Russian military equipment on display in Kyiv

Russia and Ukraine have been able to get around soft kills on the battlefield by packing their drones with tens of kilometres worth of fibre-optic cable that spools out as it flies, but that’s not an option for something travelling hundreds of kilometres across borders.

As for hard kills, Mr Hinz describes many ways of achieving them: from surface-to-air missiles to fighter jets and helicopters.

“You can have lasers which could be useful as well,” he adds, “but [these] are not quite the one the wonder weapon people make them out to be.”

André Rogaczewski believes jamming can be effective as an alternative. Ultimately, however, for any drone wall to be effective, it needs to be able to deal with a wide variety of aerial threats, possibly all coming at once.

A financially controversial question

As tensions between Europe and Russia have risen since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, so too have other incidents of so-called “hybrid” or “grey zone” warfare attributed to Russia, which in most cases denies them.

These include cyber attacks, disinformation campaigns, incendiary devices inserted into cargo depots, surveillance and sometimes sabotage of undersea cables.

And yet at a security forum in Bahrain earlier this month, Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, the Italian chairperson of Nato’s Military Committee, told me that of all Nato’s defence needs right now, air defence is the top priority.

Anadolu via Getty Images Admiral Giuseppe Cavo DragoneAnadolu via Getty Images

Adm Giuseppe Cavo Dragone sais that of all Nato’s defence needs right now, air defence is the top priority

The first stages of the drone wall are due to be activated within months, though not all details have been finalised.

Meanwhile, Nato’s Allied Command Transformation (ACT) based in Norfolk, Virginia is working on longer-term solutions. This is not an easy challenge.

Mr Tollast says the main challenge of the drone wall is the sheer scale of the area which needs to be protected. “You need a huge range of tactical radars for low flying drones and larger radars for higher altitude targets, across thousands of kilometres.

“And you need cost effective interceptors and forces to be ready around the clock. It will never be watertight, and even as costs of some radars and interceptors fall, it’s very unlikely to be cheap.”

The question of finance is a complex one. “It is a really difficult defence question,” says Mr Tollast. “Even with rising European defence expenditure, there’s still going to be a lot of competition from other sectors in defence [for that funding] – we need more ships, submarines, nuclear weapons even, satellites as well.

“So this is why a drone wall will remain this sort of slightly financially controversial issue for some people.”

It will potentially be funded from a mixture of EU money, national budgets (especially in Eastern Europe) and interest from frozen Russian assets.

Initially, says Ms Bego, the drone wall referred to defences across the Eastern flank, but since the the EU has been spearheading this, they’ve been expanding it.

A map showing countries bordering Russia and Belarus, such as Finland, Estonia and Poland

“Everyone recognises something needs to happen and there is a need to co-ordinate this and to mobilise money for this, but the who and what is very much under discussion…

“The more foolproof you would want it to be, the more expensive it gets”.

As for the target date, Mr Tollast believes 2027 is very ambitious – but adds, “they can definitely achieve more protection by then”.

Shoot the archer, not the arrow

While all of this is going on, the task of building the wall is becoming ever harder. Because as fast as new counter-drone measures are introduced, up pops a new form of drone threat that can overcome them.

This all makes it something of a new arms race.

“The development cycles for technologies in this space are hyper-accelerated, above all in conflict environments,” says Josh Burch, co-founder of Gallos Technologies, a UK-based company that invests in security technology.

“It means that any defence against drones will rapidly be rendered outdated as aggressors adjust.

“The aggressor”, he concludes, “will observe, adjust, repeat – until they get through”.

AFP via Getty Images Rescuers clear debris from a multi-story building heavily damaged following a drone strike, in Odesa 
AFP via Getty Images

Many have died or been wounded in Ukraine from Russian drone and missile strikes

So are we asking the wrong question altogether? Rather than building a drone wall to stop the drones, is it better to target the bases launching the drone themselves – as the old saying goes, shoot the archer, not just the arrow.

“It’s one thing to become more resilient against it, but it would be much better if it did not happen at all,” argues Ms Bego.

“And that’s really around making it much clearer to Russia, or whichever actor is behind this, that this kind of behaviour crosses the line. It has consequences and comes with the costs for them. And that’s important. It should really be part of this.”

But any suggestion of Nato hitting Russian targets – kinetically, as opposed to digitally in cyberspace – would be incredibly risky and escalatory.

Ever since Russia carried out its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 the challenge for Nato, and especially its most powerful member the US, has been to help Ukraine to defend itself but without getting drawn into a Nato-Russia war.

Building a defensive drone wall in Europe is one thing. Attacking the places where those drones are launched from is quite another.

Top picture credit: Getty Images, Sketchfab

InDepth notifications banner

BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. You can now sign up for notifications that will alert you whenever an InDepth story is published – click here to find out how.


www.bbc.com

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World News

US reportedly pursuing third oil tanker linked to Venezuela

Published

on

By


The US Coast Guard is in “active pursuit” of another vessel in international waters near Venezuela, an official has told the BBC’s US partner CBS News, as tensions in the region continue to escalate.

US authorities have already seized two oil tankers this month – one of them on Saturday.

Sunday’s pursuit related to a “sanctioned dark fleet vessel that is part of Venezuela’s illegal sanctions evasion”, a US official said. “It is flying a false flag and under a judicial seizure order.”

Washington has accused Venezuela of using oil money to fund drug-related crime, while Venezuela has described the tanker seizures as “theft and kidnapping”.

US President Donald Trump last week ordered a “blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving the country.

Venezuela – home to the world largest proven oil reserves – has accused the Trump administration of trying to steal its resources.

US authorities have not yet officially confirmed Sunday’s pursuit, and the exact location and name of the tanker involved is not yet known.

As of last week, more than 30 of the 80 ships in Venezuelan waters or approaching the country were under US sanctions, according to data compiled by TankerTrackers.com.

Saturday’s seizure saw a Panamanian-flagged tanker boarded by a specialised tactical team in international waters.

That ship is not on the US Treasury’s list of sanctioned vessels, but the US has said it was carrying “sanctioned PDVSA oil”. In the past five years the ship also sailed under the flags of Greece and Liberia, according to records seen by BBC Verify.

“These acts will not go unpunished,” the Venezuelan government said in response to Saturday’s incident. It added that it intended to file a complaint with the UN Security Council and “other multilateral agencies and the governments of the world”.

Venezuela is highly dependent on revenues from its oil exports to finance its government spending.

In recent weeks, the US has built up its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and has carried out deadly strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling boats, killing around 100 people.

It has provided no public evidence that these vessels were carrying drugs, and the military has come under increasing scrutiny from Congress over the strikes.

The Trump administration has accused Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of leading a designated-terrorist organisation called Cartel de los Soles, which he denies.


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

World News

In rebel-held Myanmar, civilians flee junta airstrikes and a forced election

Published

on

By


Yogita LimayeSouth Asia and Afghanistan correspondent in Myanmar

BBC Iang Za Kim, sitting in a green shirt on the floor of a community centre in IndiaBBC

Iang Za Kim had to flee her home after the junta launched air strikes nearby

Late one night last month Iang Za Kim heard explosions in a neighbouring village, then fighter jets flying overhead. She ran out of her home to see smoke rising from a distance.

“We were terrified. We thought the junta’s planes would bomb us too. So we grabbed what we could – some food and clothes and ran into the jungles surrounding our village.”

Iang’s face quivers as she recounts the story of what happened on 26 November in K-Haimual, her village in Myanmar’s western Chin State, and then she breaks down.

She’s among thousands of civilians who’ve fled their homes in recent weeks after the Burmese military launched a fierce campaign of air strikes, and a ground offensive in rebel-held areas across the country, to recapture territory ahead of elections starting on 28 December.

Four other women sitting around her on straw mats also start crying. The trauma of what they’ve gone through to make it to safety is clearly visible.

While the air strikes were the immediate cause for Iang to flee, she also doesn’t want to be forced to participate in the election.

“If we are caught and refuse to vote, they will put us in jail and torture us. We’ve run away so that we don’t have to vote,” she says.

Civilians sit on the floor of a community centre in India

Many civilians have crossed into India to escape the violence in Myanmar

Some from Chin state have described the junta’s latest offensive as the fiercest it has launched in more than three years.

Many of the displaced have sought refuge in other parts of the state. Iang is among a group that crossed the border into India’s Mizoram state. Currently sheltered in a rundown badminton court in Vaphai village, the group’s few belongings they were able to carry are packed in plastic sacks.

Indian villagers have given them food and basic supplies.

Ral Uk Thang has had to flee his home at the age of 80, living in makeshift shelters in jungles for days, before finally making it to safety.

“We’re afraid of our own government. They are extremely cruel. Their military has come into our and other villages in the past, they’ve arrested people, tortured them, and burned down homes,” he says.

It isn’t easy to speak to Burmese civilians freely. Myanmar’s military government does not allow free access in the country for foreign journalists. It took over the country in a coup in February 2021, shortly after the last election, and has since been widely condemned for running a repressive regime that has indiscriminately targeted civilians as it looks to crush the armed uprising against it across Myanmar.

During its latest offensive, the junta last week targeted a hospital in Rakhine State, just south of Chin State. Rebel groups in Rakhine say at least 30 people were killed and more than 70 injured.

The Chin Human Rights Organisation says that since mid-September at least three schools and six churches in Chin State have been targeted by junta airstrikes, killing 12 people including six children.

Myanmar map

The BBC has independently verified the bombing of a school in Vanha village on 13 October. Two students –Johan Phun Lian Cung, who was seven, and Zing Cer Mawi, 12 – were killed as they were attending lessons. The bombs ripped through their classrooms injuring more than a dozen other students.

Myanmar’s military government did not respond to the BBC’s questions about the allegations.

This is the second time Bawi Nei Lian and his young family – a wife and two young children – have been displaced. Back in 2021, soon after the coup, their home in Falam town was burnt down in an air strike. They rebuilt their lives in K-Haimual village. Now they’re homeless again.

“I can’t find the words to explain how painful and hard it is and what a difficult decision it was to make to leave. But we had to do it to stay alive,” he says.

“I want the world to know that what the military is claiming – that this election is free and fair – this is absolutely false. When the main political party is not being allowed to contest the election, how can there be genuine democracy?”

Bawi Nei Lian and his family sit on the floor of the community centre in India. He's dressed in a white track suit

Bawi Nei Lian (left) says the scheduled elections are a sham

The National League for Democracy party, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, which won landslides in the two elections prior to the coup, will not be contesting as most of its senior leaders including Suu Kyi are in jail.

“We don’t want the election. Because the military does not know how to govern our country. They only work for the benefit of their high-ranking leaders. When Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s party was in power, we experienced a bit of democracy. But now all we do is cry and shed tears,” says Ral Uk Thang.

Iang Za Kim believes the election will be rigged. “If we voted for a party not allied with the military, I believe they will steal our votes and claim we voted for them.”

The election will take place in phases, with a result expected around the end of January. Rebel groups have called it a sham.

At the base of the Chin National Front in Myanmar, the most prominent rebel group operating in the state, the group’s Vice Chairman Sui Khar says: “This election is only being held to prolong military dictatorship. It’s not about the people’s choice. And in Chin State, they hardly control much area, so how can they hold an election?”

He points out the areas where the most intense fighting is ongoing on a map and tells us nearly 50 rebel fighters have been injured in just the past month. There have been deaths too, but so far the groups have not released a number.

“There are columns of hundreds of soldiers trying to advance into the northern part of Chin state from four directions,” Sui Khar says. “The soldiers are being supported by air strikes, artillery fire and by drone units.”

Abel lies on a hospital bed under a floral blanket with heavily bandaged hands

Abel lost his right left and his hands were severely wounded fighting against the junta

Access to the base is extremely rare. Set amid thickly forested mountains, it is the heart of the resistance against the junta in Chin state.

Sui Khar takes us to the hospital at the base. We see a group of injured fighters who were brought in overnight and had to undergo hours of surgery. Some of them have had to undergo amputations.

Many of them were just schoolboys when the coup occurred in 2021. Just about adults now, they’ve let go of their dreams to fight on the frontline against the junta.

Abel, 18, is in too much pain to speak. He was with a group of fighters trying to take back territory the junta captured a week ago. They won the battle, but Abel lost his right leg and has serious injuries to his hands as well.

In a bed next to him is Si Si Maung, 19, who’s also had a leg amputated.

“As the enemy was retreating we ran forward and I stepped on a landmine. We were injured in the explosion. Then we were attacked from the air. The airstrikes make things very difficult for us,” he says. “I’ve lost a leg, but even if I’ve to give up my life I’m happy to make the sacrifice so that future generations have a better life.”

The impact of the ferocity of the latest offensive is visible in room after room at the hospital.

Yet, it’s the support and grit of tens of thousands of youngsters like Si Si Maung, who picked up arms to fight against the junta, that have helped the rebels make rapid advances against a much more powerful rival in the past four-and-a-half years.

Some like 80-year-old Ral Uk Thang hope that after the election, the junta will retreat, and he will be able to go back home.

“But I don’t think I will live to see democracy restored in Myanmar,” he says. “I hope my children and grandchildren can witness it some day.”

Additional reporting by Aamir Peerzada, Sanjay Ganguly and Aakriti Thapar


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

World News

A memorial ends – but Bondi tragedy has left Australia reeling, again

Published

on

By


Tiffanie TurnbullBondi Beach

Getty Images The image of a candle lit up on the Opera House sailsGetty Images

There’s been an outpouring of support from the community – but tension remains

As helicopters circled overhead, sirens descended on her suburb, and people ran screaming down her street on 14 December, Mary felt a grim sense of deja vu.

“That was when I knew there was something seriously wrong – again,” she says, her eyes brimming with tears.

Mary – who did not want to give her real name – was at the Westfield Bondi Junction shopping centre last April when six people were stabbed to death by a man in psychosis, a tragedy still fresh in the minds of many.

Findings from a coronial inquest into the incident were due to be delivered this week, but were delayed after two gunmen unleashed a hail of bullets on an event marking the start of the Jewish festival of Hanukkah eight days ago.

Declared a terror attack by police, 15 people were shot and killed, including a 10-year-old girl who still had face paint curling around her eyes.

The first paramedic to confront the bloody scenes at the Chanukah by the Sea event was also the first paramedic on the scene at the Westfield stabbings.

“You just wouldn’t even fathom that something like this would happen,” 31-year-old Mary, who is originally from the UK, tells the BBC. “I say constantly to my family at home how safe it is here.”

This was the overarching sentiment in the days following the shooting. This kind of thing, mass murder, just doesn’t happen in Australia.

But it can and it has – twice, in the same community, within 18 months.

A sea of flowers left by shocked and grieving people at Bondi is being packed up. A national day of reflection is over. On Sunday night, Jewish Australians lit candles for the last time this Hannukah.

But the two tragedies have left scores physically scarred and traumatised, and the nation’s sense of safety shattered.

‘Everyone knows someone affected’

EPA Photos of victims of the deadly shooting at Bondi BeachEPA

Funerals for the victims have drawn thousands of mourners this week

Bondi is Australia’s most famous beach – a globally recognised symbol of its way of life.

It’s also a quintessential slice of Australian community. There’s a bit of “everyone knows everyone” – and that means everyone knows someone affected by the 14 December tragedy, mayor Will Nemesh told the BBC.

“One of the first people I texted was [Rabbi] Eli Schlanger. And I said, ‘I hope you’re OK. Call me if you need anything’,” he said.

But the British-born father of five, also known as the “Bondi Rabbi”, was among the dead.

The first responders, police and paramedics would have been working on members of their own community. Others had the task of having to treat the shooters who had taken aim at their colleagues.

“[Westfield Bondi Junction] was horrendous, something we’re certainly not used to. And then this again was massive, catastrophic injuries,” Ryan Park, health minister for New South Wales, told the BBC.

“They’ve seen things that are like you would see in a war zone… You don’t get those images out of your head,” Park added.

Mayor Nemesh fears this will forever be a stain on Bondi, and Australia.

“If this can happen here at Bondi Beach, it really could happen anywhere… the impact has reverberated around Australia.”

EPA NSW Minister for Health Ryan Park places flowers at a memorial at Bondi BeachEPA

Ryan Park says healthcare workers will take time to recover from what they’ve seen

‘Warnings ignored’

No one is feeling this more than the Jewish community, for whom Bondi has become a sanctuary.

“I swam here every day for years on end, rain or shine. And this week… I couldn’t get in the water. It didn’t feel right. It felt sacrilegious in some way,” Zac Seidler, a local clinical psychologist, told the BBC.

Many of the victims of the attack moved here over many decades for safety from persecution, including 89-year-old Holocaust survivor Alex Kleytman. Instead, his life was bookended by violent acts of antisemitic hate.

Mr Seidler has spent the past two years trying to convince his grandparents, who are also Holocaust survivors, to hold on to their belief in the good of humanity.

“[My grandmother] kept saying, ‘These are the signs. I’ve seen this before’. And I just kept saying, ‘Not in Australia, not here. You’re safe’, just trying to soothe her.

“But now I kind of feel like the fool.”

No community is a monolith, but one thing many Jewish Australians believe is that warnings about a rise of antisemitism in the months preceding this attack were ignored.

The year started with a spate of vandalism and arson incidents on Jewish marks in the suburbs surrounding Bondi. It has ended with mass murder targeting their community.

Watch: Jewish Australians on why Bondi is a ‘sanctuary’ for them

There has been resistance in the face of fear – some leaders urging Jewish Australians to double down, be more publicly Jewish and display their religious symbols with pride.

One woman perusing the flowers outside the Bondi Pavilion on Sunday admits she is too scared to do that. It took her all week to even work up the courage to visit this site, which is just metres from where many of the victims died.

“I’ve never felt my Jewishness before. I’ve never experienced antisemitism in my whole life until now,” MaryAnne says. “And now, I don’t want to wear my Star of David.”

Community, anger and sadness

The shooting triggered a massive outpouring of support from around the nation.

When the news broke, many in the community rallied to help.

Lifeguards – volunteer and paid – put their lives on the line. Restaurants opened their doors and hid people in their store rooms and freezers, and locals ushered lost children into their apartments.

Even the New South Wales opposition leader Kellie Sloane – also the local state member – was at the scene, helping pack bullet wounds.

In the days after the shooting, thousands of ordinary Australians lined up – many for hours on end – to donate blood desperately needed to treat those injured.

Each day, a carpet of petals, handwritten notes, commemorative stones and candles grew out from the gates of the Bondi Pavilion.

Bee motifs – stickers, balloons, even pavement art – are all over the suburb, in remembrance of Matilda, the terror attack’s youngest victim.

Surfers and swimmers on Friday paddled out beyond Bondi’s iconic breaks to honour those who died.

A day later, surf livesavers and lifeguards stood shoulder to shoulder on the beach in solidarity with the Jewish community.

But amid the platitudes, sadness and shock is calcifying into anger and tension.

Surfers and swimmers pay tribute to victims of Bondi shooting

Last year’s Bondi Junction stabbings were devastating for the community – but a shared resolution united it.

Experts say the attacker, who had schizophrenia, was in psychosis at the time of the stabbings, and his family have previously said he was frustrated at being unable to find a girlfriend. The question of whether he targeted women will likely forever go unanswered. But clear failures in the mental health system have been identified.

Last month, families of the victims asked the coroner to refer the doctor who weaned him off medication with limited supervision to regulators for investigation, and they have also argued for a massive boost to mental health service funding.

But last Sunday’s events raise more uncomfortable feelings and questions.

There is palpable fury at the government, over a perceived – and admitted – failure to do more to stop antisemitism. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been booed during public appearances this week, and talking to people visiting the site of the attack in Bondi, it isn’t uncommon to hear them demand his resignation.

Many people the BBC spoke to pointed to his government’s decision to recognise Palestinian statehood, alongside countries including the UK and Canada, and regular protests in Australia by members of the pro-Palestinian movement, which though largely peaceful but have been peppered with antisemitic chants and placards.

The state of New South Wales – which has in recent years tightened protest rules – has already announced it will introduce more legislation cracking down on “hateful” chants and give police more powers to investigate demonstrators. The federal government has promised similar.

The blame apportioned to these protests does not sit right with many, even some sections of the Jewish community.

“We need to hold multiple truths,” Mr Seidler says. “We can be afraid, we can feel that there is deep antisemitic rhetoric going on in certain circles within Australia… while also understanding that there is a right of people in this country – especially Muslim Australians – to be concerned about what is taking place in Gaza.

“We need to get better at finding that line and calling out when that line has been crossed.”

Getty Images A boy wearing a kippah and draped in an Israeli flag walks in BondiGetty Images

Many Jewish Australians are angry at the government

For others, there is anger at what they feel is the politicisation of a tragedy.

“It’s a bloody photo op,” one woman tells me on Sunday, as a prominent Australian businesswoman arrives and begins posing with the floral tributes outside the Bondi Pavilion.

Some – including the local federal MP Allegra Spender – worry the attack is being used to fuel anti-immigration sentiment.

“We would not have had the man who saved so many Australians if we had cut off, for instance, Muslim immigration,” she said.

Mr Seidler says these arguments fail to recognise that antisemitic views – and other forms of bigotry – are formed here too.

“I heard someone say the other day that Australia thinks it’s on a holiday from history, that we’re somehow immune to this stuff, that it’s not bred here, it’s imported,” Mr Seidler says.

With the anger, there is also fear: for the Jewish community of other attacks, for the Muslim community of retaliation for an act of terror they have loudly condemned.

There are questions over how Australia’s security agency fumbled an alleged terrorist who at one point was on their watch list, prompting a review into federal police and intelligence agencies that was announced on Sunday.

There is frustration at NSW Police, who have for years been warned by the Muslim community of hate preachers poaching their young men.

There is animosity towards the media, driven by hurt among both Jewish and Arab Australians over a belief they and their communities have been misrepresented, and frustration at what some feel is incitement against them.

But there is also a queasiness at the treatment of traumatised victims throughout this week, some of whom were interviewed live on television while the blood of their friends still stained their hands.

Through it all, is an undercurrent of suspicion of institutions and each other.

There are varying opinions on how those rifts can heal – or even if they can. But there is a shared determination to try.

EPA Rabbi Yehoram Ulman, the father-in-law of Rabbi Eli Schlanger, one of the prominent victims of the Bondi Beach Massacre, addresses people during the National Day of Reflection vigil and commemoration for the victims and survivors of the Bondi Massacre at Bondi Beach EPA

Rabbi Yehoram Ulman has called for unity and love

One UK expat who was at the beach at the time of the shooting says everyone he speaks to is adamant this will not change Bondi, or Australia.

“It’s seriously unique what you have as a nation… there’s a magic about it,” Henry Jamieson tells the BBC.

“I’m traumatised… and I’m going to have to deal with that for the rest of my life, I know I am… even people who weren’t there were traumatised.

“But I’m not gonna let it shake me and we will not let it shake this community.

“You can’t let them win,” he says of the alleged terrorists.

At an emotional memorial on Sunday night, seven days since the attack, the same sense of defiance was on show. It ended with the lighting of the menorah, something the crowds gathered for Hannukah last week never got to do.

The shamash, the centre candle, was lit by the father of Ahmed al Ahmed, in honour of his bravery in wrestling a gun off one of the attackers. The children of the two rabbis who were killed lit another. Others were lit by a representative of surf lifesavers and a Jewish community medic who rushed to the scene and began treating the injured before the shots had even stopped. The final candle was lit by Michael, the father of Matilda, who has been described a fountain of joy to all who knew her.

After the parade of diverse Australians had sparked flames on each arm of the menorah, Rabbi Yehoram Ulman of Bondi Chabad made a plea for more love and more unity.

“Returning to normal is not enough,” he said.

“Sydney can and must become a beacon of goodness. A city where people look out for one another, where kindness is louder than hate, where decency is stronger than fear, and we can make it happen,” he said, stopping for a moment as the crowd applauded.

“But only if we take the feelings we have right now and turn them into action, into continuous action.”


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

Trending