Connect with us

World News

Should Hitler’s DNA have been studied?

Published

on


Getty Images A colour treated photo of Hitler speaking into a big microphone. He's wearing a light brown jacket and red tie.Getty Images

Groundbreaking DNA analysis of Adolf Hitler’s blood has uncovered some extraordinary findings about the dictator’s ancestry and possible health conditions.

Painstaking scientific testing by a team of international experts has been able to debunk a rumour on whether Hitler had Jewish ancestry (he didn’t) and determine that he had a genetic disorder which affects the development of sexual organs – all from an old blood-stained swatch of fabric.

While clickbait headlines have focused on whether the Nazi dictator had a micropenis and only one testicle, more serious are the findings that his DNA showed “very high” scores – in the top 1% – for a predisposition to autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Does this mean he had these neurological conditions? Absolutely not, say the experts – it’s not a diagnosis.

But nevertheless, concerns have been raised about stigmatisation and how ethical the research was, prompting the question – should it have been done at all?

“I agonised over it,” says Prof Turi King within the first few minutes of Saturday’s Channel 4 documentary on the research, Hitler’s DNA: Blueprint of a Dictator.

The genetics expert told the BBC that when she was first approached to take part in the project several years ago, she was very aware of the potential implications on studying the DNA of someone like Adolf Hitler – “I’m not interested in sensationalising things”.

But, she says, it was likely to be done by someone at some point, and at least under her watch she could ensure the research was done with academic rigour and with all the “caveats and guardrails in place”.

Prof King is no stranger to high-profile and sensitive projects – she led the genetic investigation to establish the identity of Richard III’s skeleton after it was discovered buried under a car park in Leicester in 2012.

Gettysburg Museum of History A brown and blue ripped swatch of fabric that looks quite dirty.Gettysburg Museum of History

The swatch of fabric was cut from the sofa in Hitler’s bunker – the blood stain can be seen on the bottom-left

The bloodied swatch of fabric – now 80 years old – was cut out of the sofa in Hitler’s underground bunker, where he killed himself when Allied forces descended on Berlin at the end of World War Two.

While inspecting the bunker, Colonel Roswell P Rosengren of the US army saw an opportunity to get a unique war trophy and he pocketed the fabric. It’s now framed and on display at the Gettysburg Museum of History in the US.

The scientists are confident it really is Hitler’s blood, because they were able to perfectly match the Y-chromosome with a DNA sample from a male relative that had been collected a decade prior.

The results, which are now under peer review, are indeed fascinating.

It is the first time Hitler’s DNA has been identified, and over the course of four years, scientists were able to sequence it to see the genetic makeup of one of the world’s most horrific tyrants.

What is certain, experts say, is that Hitler did not have Jewish ancestry – a rumour that had been circulating since the 1920s.

Another key finding is that he had Kallmann syndrome, a genetic disorder that, among other things, can affect puberty and the development of sexual organs. In particular, it can lead to a micropenis and undescended testes – which, if you know the British war-time song, had been another rumour flying around about Hitler.

Kallmann syndrome can also affect the libido, which is particularly interesting, said historian and Potsdam University lecturer Dr Alex Kay, who is featured in the documentary.

“It tells us a lot about his private life – or more accurately, that he didn’t have a private life,” he explains.

Historians have long debated why Hitler was so completely devoted to politics, “to the almost total exclusion of any kind of private life”, and this could help to explain that.

These kinds of findings, the experts say, are what make them both fascinating and useful. As Prof King puts it: “the marrying of history and genetics”.

Tom Barnes/Channel 4 Turi King, wearing a blue long-sleeved blouse, and Alex Kay, wearing a black shirt, standing at a desk.Tom Barnes/Channel 4

Genetics expert Prof Turi King and historian Dr Alex Kay

More complicated and controversial are the results suggesting Hitler may have had one or more neurodiverse or mental health conditions.

Looking at his genome, and comparing it with polygenic scores, they found that Hitler had a high predisposition for autism, ADHD, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

This is where the science gets complex.

Polygenic scoring combs through a person’s DNA and calculates how likely they may be to develop a disease. It can be useful to detect an individual’s predisposition to conditions like heart disease and common cancers. But it compares their DNA with a large population sample, and therefore the findings can be far less certain when it comes down to an individual.

Throughout the documentary, which the BBC has seen, the experts are at pains to reiterate that the DNA analysis is not a diagnosis, but an indication of predisposition – it does not mean Hitler had any of these conditions.

But some genetic scientists have raised concerns that the findings are an oversimplification.

Denise Syndercombe Court, professor of forensic genetics at Kings College London, feels they have “gone too far in their assumptions”.

“In terms of character or behaviour, I’d have thought that’s pretty useless,” Prof Court, who tested the same blood sample in 2018, told the BBC.

She said she wouldn’t want to make any predictions as to whether someone had a particular condition from the results, because of “incomplete penetrance”.

Put simply, by fellow genetic scientist Dr Sundhya Raman: “Just because you have something encoded in your DNA, doesn’t mean you’ll express it.”

This is reflected in the documentary by Prof Simon Baron-Cohen, director of the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge University: “Going from biology to behaviour is a big jump,” he says.

“By looking at genetic results like this, there’s a risk of stigma. People out there might think, ‘Is my diagnosis being linked to somebody who did such monstrous things?'”

“The risk is reductionism down to genetics,” he says, when there are so many other factors to consider.

Getty Images Black and white photo of a baby.Getty Images

Adolf Hitler as a baby – likely taken in 1889

The UK’s National Autistic Society was quick to respond, calling the findings a “cheap stunt”.

“Even worse than the shoddy science, we’re shocked at [the documentary’s] callous disregard for autistic people’s feelings,” said Tim Nicholls, assistant director of research, in a strongly worded statement.

“Autistic people deserve better than this.”

The BBC put the concerns to Channel 4 and Blink Films, the production company that made the documentary.

In a statement, it pointed out that experts like Prof Baron-Cohen “explain that how someone behaves is a product of many factors, not just their genetics but also, very importantly, their environment, everything from childhood and life experiences, how they were brought up, access to education and resources and the cultural factors around them.”

“The programme emphasises that the genetic insights revealed in the films shed light on Hitler, but they don’t tell us he was biologically predestined to behave in a particular way.”

Stephanie Bonnas Weber has short browny-grey hair and wears black rimmed glasses. It's a studio shot and he's wearing a blue suitStephanie Bonnas

Professor Thomas Weber said he felt “in equal measure electrified and concerned” when he saw the research results

There have also been raised eyebrows at the very name of the documentary, especially the second part: Blueprint of a Dictator.

Prof King said it wasn’t a name she would have chosen, and historian Prof Thomas Weber, who is featured in the programme, told the BBC he was surprised at the title, given they had stressed there is “no dictator gene”.

The professor, who had not seen the documentary before speaking to the BBC, said he found the DNA analysis both exciting and concerning.

“Exciting, because it confirmed a lot of things I already suspected about Hitler… but I had concerns on whether people would read too much into genetics, like trying to find the ‘evil gene’.”

He was also concerned about how it would be received, especially for people with autism and other syndromes mentioned in the programme.

There are many difficulties and pitfalls when you’re trying to make an accurate programme about complicated science for the general public.

“It’s television – it occasionally gets simplified,” said Prof King, who has a lot of experience balancing her responsibilities as a scientist with the realities of the media.

“They [the documentary makers] could have taken a different tack and gone very sensationalist but they haven’t, they’ve tried to catch some of the nuance… and we’ve put in the guardrails.”

Channel 4 defended the show’s name by saying that “DNA is colloquially known as the ‘blueprint of life’.” Additionally, its job is to “make programmes that reach a wide audience, and this programme aims to make complex scientific ideas and historical research accessible to all viewers”.

Alamy Black and white image of a man inspecting the couchAlamy

Allied war journalists examine the sofa inside Hitler’s bunker in 1945 – it is said that the staining on the arm of the chair is blood

There are many questions on the ethics of the project.

Should Hitler’s DNA have been examined if his permission – or that of a direct descendant – could not be given?

And how does that play into the fact that he was responsible for one of history’s worst atrocities? Does that negate his right to privacy?

“This is Hitler – he’s not some mystical character whom no one can conduct DNA research on. Who makes that decision?” Prof King argues.

Historian Subhadra Das agrees: “This is what scientists do. There are hundreds of long-dead people who have had their DNA sampled, it’s a common practice in science and archaeology – it’s how we read into it that starts to become problematic.”

Historian Dr Kay said he wasn’t concerned about the ethical angle, “as long as the facts were there and we made sure everything was double checked”.

And on whether Hitler’s DNA should have been touched: “Hitler’s been dead for 80 years. He doesn’t have any direct descendants and he didn’t have any children. He was responsible for untold suffering – we have to weigh that against the ethical dilemma of analysing his DNA.”

Interestingly, several labs in Europe declined being part of the project, and it was a facility in the US that did the testing.

The documentary-makers told the BBC that the research “has gone through the standard ethical review process for academic work” which includes reviews conducted in two countries.

General Photographic Agency/Hulton Archive/Getty Images Black and white image of Hitler walking along with uniformed men behind himGeneral Photographic Agency/Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Hitler in 1933

So should this research have been conducted at all? The BBC spoke to a range of genetic scientists and historians, and the answer depends on who you ask.

Those in the documentary, naturally, say yes. It helps to build a more rounded profile of Hitler, a person who still fascinates and terrifies in equal measure.

“We should do whatever we can to understand past extremism,” Prof Weber believes.

“Let’s be honest,” says Dr Kay, “these topics were already out there… we haven’t suddenly planted this idea in people’s minds. People have been speculating on whether Hitler had certain disorders for decades.”

Not all historians agree.

“I think it’s a very dubious way of trying to explain what drove Hitler’s actions,” says Iva Vukusic, assistant professor of international history at Utrecht University.

Dr Vukusic, whose studies focus on the perpetration of mass violence, told the BBC she can understand why people are interested, but “whatever answers we seek are not going to be found through a DNA test”.

And while the research is interesting, it runs the risk of obscuring the real lessons of history, says Anne van Mourik, historian at the NIOD Institute in Amsterdam.

That lesson is that “normal people in certain contexts can commit, instigate or accept horrific violence”.

Focusing on Hitler’s (possible) micropenis, she says, doesn’t teach us anything about how mass violence and genocide works and why it occurs.

Getty Images Hitler and a woman, each holding a dog on a leash.Getty Images

Hitler with Eva Braun, whom he married shortly before they killed themselves in the bunker

With the study complete and the research under peer review, at some point, the full findings will be available.

Prof Weber says they should be used “extremely carefully and soberly”, but he’s hopeful that it is helpful in some way.

“That’s the nice thing about research results – it might happen in five, 150, 500 years time. This research is there for posterity and I’m confident that smart people will use them in the future.”

But we all have a responsibility on how we use these results.

Dr Kay says everyone must “follow the science” and make it clear on what we know and what we don’t.

That includes the media and how it is reported.

“Anyone watching this documentary has a responsibility to write on it accurately, to make sure they’re not contributing to the stigmatisation.

“A documentary like this doesn’t exist in a vacuum.”


www.bbc.com

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World News

US reportedly pursuing third oil tanker linked to Venezuela

Published

on

By


The US Coast Guard is in “active pursuit” of another vessel in international waters near Venezuela, an official has told the BBC’s US partner CBS News, as tensions in the region continue to escalate.

US authorities have already seized two oil tankers this month – one of them on Saturday.

Sunday’s pursuit related to a “sanctioned dark fleet vessel that is part of Venezuela’s illegal sanctions evasion”, a US official said. “It is flying a false flag and under a judicial seizure order.”

Washington has accused Venezuela of using oil money to fund drug-related crime, while Venezuela has described the tanker seizures as “theft and kidnapping”.

US President Donald Trump last week ordered a “blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving the country.

Venezuela – home to the world largest proven oil reserves – has accused the Trump administration of trying to steal its resources.

US authorities have not yet officially confirmed Sunday’s pursuit, and the exact location and name of the tanker involved is not yet known.

As of last week, more than 30 of the 80 ships in Venezuelan waters or approaching the country were under US sanctions, according to data compiled by TankerTrackers.com.

Saturday’s seizure saw a Panamanian-flagged tanker boarded by a specialised tactical team in international waters.

That ship is not on the US Treasury’s list of sanctioned vessels, but the US has said it was carrying “sanctioned PDVSA oil”. In the past five years the ship also sailed under the flags of Greece and Liberia, according to records seen by BBC Verify.

“These acts will not go unpunished,” the Venezuelan government said in response to Saturday’s incident. It added that it intended to file a complaint with the UN Security Council and “other multilateral agencies and the governments of the world”.

Venezuela is highly dependent on revenues from its oil exports to finance its government spending.

In recent weeks, the US has built up its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and has carried out deadly strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling boats, killing around 100 people.

It has provided no public evidence that these vessels were carrying drugs, and the military has come under increasing scrutiny from Congress over the strikes.

The Trump administration has accused Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of leading a designated-terrorist organisation called Cartel de los Soles, which he denies.


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

World News

In rebel-held Myanmar, civilians flee junta airstrikes and a forced election

Published

on

By


Yogita LimayeSouth Asia and Afghanistan correspondent in Myanmar

BBC Iang Za Kim, sitting in a green shirt on the floor of a community centre in IndiaBBC

Iang Za Kim had to flee her home after the junta launched air strikes nearby

Late one night last month Iang Za Kim heard explosions in a neighbouring village, then fighter jets flying overhead. She ran out of her home to see smoke rising from a distance.

“We were terrified. We thought the junta’s planes would bomb us too. So we grabbed what we could – some food and clothes and ran into the jungles surrounding our village.”

Iang’s face quivers as she recounts the story of what happened on 26 November in K-Haimual, her village in Myanmar’s western Chin State, and then she breaks down.

She’s among thousands of civilians who’ve fled their homes in recent weeks after the Burmese military launched a fierce campaign of air strikes, and a ground offensive in rebel-held areas across the country, to recapture territory ahead of elections starting on 28 December.

Four other women sitting around her on straw mats also start crying. The trauma of what they’ve gone through to make it to safety is clearly visible.

While the air strikes were the immediate cause for Iang to flee, she also doesn’t want to be forced to participate in the election.

“If we are caught and refuse to vote, they will put us in jail and torture us. We’ve run away so that we don’t have to vote,” she says.

Civilians sit on the floor of a community centre in India

Many civilians have crossed into India to escape the violence in Myanmar

Some from Chin state have described the junta’s latest offensive as the fiercest it has launched in more than three years.

Many of the displaced have sought refuge in other parts of the state. Iang is among a group that crossed the border into India’s Mizoram state. Currently sheltered in a rundown badminton court in Vaphai village, the group’s few belongings they were able to carry are packed in plastic sacks.

Indian villagers have given them food and basic supplies.

Ral Uk Thang has had to flee his home at the age of 80, living in makeshift shelters in jungles for days, before finally making it to safety.

“We’re afraid of our own government. They are extremely cruel. Their military has come into our and other villages in the past, they’ve arrested people, tortured them, and burned down homes,” he says.

It isn’t easy to speak to Burmese civilians freely. Myanmar’s military government does not allow free access in the country for foreign journalists. It took over the country in a coup in February 2021, shortly after the last election, and has since been widely condemned for running a repressive regime that has indiscriminately targeted civilians as it looks to crush the armed uprising against it across Myanmar.

During its latest offensive, the junta last week targeted a hospital in Rakhine State, just south of Chin State. Rebel groups in Rakhine say at least 30 people were killed and more than 70 injured.

The Chin Human Rights Organisation says that since mid-September at least three schools and six churches in Chin State have been targeted by junta airstrikes, killing 12 people including six children.

Myanmar map

The BBC has independently verified the bombing of a school in Vanha village on 13 October. Two students –Johan Phun Lian Cung, who was seven, and Zing Cer Mawi, 12 – were killed as they were attending lessons. The bombs ripped through their classrooms injuring more than a dozen other students.

Myanmar’s military government did not respond to the BBC’s questions about the allegations.

This is the second time Bawi Nei Lian and his young family – a wife and two young children – have been displaced. Back in 2021, soon after the coup, their home in Falam town was burnt down in an air strike. They rebuilt their lives in K-Haimual village. Now they’re homeless again.

“I can’t find the words to explain how painful and hard it is and what a difficult decision it was to make to leave. But we had to do it to stay alive,” he says.

“I want the world to know that what the military is claiming – that this election is free and fair – this is absolutely false. When the main political party is not being allowed to contest the election, how can there be genuine democracy?”

Bawi Nei Lian and his family sit on the floor of the community centre in India. He's dressed in a white track suit

Bawi Nei Lian (left) says the scheduled elections are a sham

The National League for Democracy party, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, which won landslides in the two elections prior to the coup, will not be contesting as most of its senior leaders including Suu Kyi are in jail.

“We don’t want the election. Because the military does not know how to govern our country. They only work for the benefit of their high-ranking leaders. When Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s party was in power, we experienced a bit of democracy. But now all we do is cry and shed tears,” says Ral Uk Thang.

Iang Za Kim believes the election will be rigged. “If we voted for a party not allied with the military, I believe they will steal our votes and claim we voted for them.”

The election will take place in phases, with a result expected around the end of January. Rebel groups have called it a sham.

At the base of the Chin National Front in Myanmar, the most prominent rebel group operating in the state, the group’s Vice Chairman Sui Khar says: “This election is only being held to prolong military dictatorship. It’s not about the people’s choice. And in Chin State, they hardly control much area, so how can they hold an election?”

He points out the areas where the most intense fighting is ongoing on a map and tells us nearly 50 rebel fighters have been injured in just the past month. There have been deaths too, but so far the groups have not released a number.

“There are columns of hundreds of soldiers trying to advance into the northern part of Chin state from four directions,” Sui Khar says. “The soldiers are being supported by air strikes, artillery fire and by drone units.”

Abel lies on a hospital bed under a floral blanket with heavily bandaged hands

Abel lost his right left and his hands were severely wounded fighting against the junta

Access to the base is extremely rare. Set amid thickly forested mountains, it is the heart of the resistance against the junta in Chin state.

Sui Khar takes us to the hospital at the base. We see a group of injured fighters who were brought in overnight and had to undergo hours of surgery. Some of them have had to undergo amputations.

Many of them were just schoolboys when the coup occurred in 2021. Just about adults now, they’ve let go of their dreams to fight on the frontline against the junta.

Abel, 18, is in too much pain to speak. He was with a group of fighters trying to take back territory the junta captured a week ago. They won the battle, but Abel lost his right leg and has serious injuries to his hands as well.

In a bed next to him is Si Si Maung, 19, who’s also had a leg amputated.

“As the enemy was retreating we ran forward and I stepped on a landmine. We were injured in the explosion. Then we were attacked from the air. The airstrikes make things very difficult for us,” he says. “I’ve lost a leg, but even if I’ve to give up my life I’m happy to make the sacrifice so that future generations have a better life.”

The impact of the ferocity of the latest offensive is visible in room after room at the hospital.

Yet, it’s the support and grit of tens of thousands of youngsters like Si Si Maung, who picked up arms to fight against the junta, that have helped the rebels make rapid advances against a much more powerful rival in the past four-and-a-half years.

Some like 80-year-old Ral Uk Thang hope that after the election, the junta will retreat, and he will be able to go back home.

“But I don’t think I will live to see democracy restored in Myanmar,” he says. “I hope my children and grandchildren can witness it some day.”

Additional reporting by Aamir Peerzada, Sanjay Ganguly and Aakriti Thapar


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

World News

A memorial ends – but Bondi tragedy has left Australia reeling, again

Published

on

By


Tiffanie TurnbullBondi Beach

Getty Images The image of a candle lit up on the Opera House sailsGetty Images

There’s been an outpouring of support from the community – but tension remains

As helicopters circled overhead, sirens descended on her suburb, and people ran screaming down her street on 14 December, Mary felt a grim sense of deja vu.

“That was when I knew there was something seriously wrong – again,” she says, her eyes brimming with tears.

Mary – who did not want to give her real name – was at the Westfield Bondi Junction shopping centre last April when six people were stabbed to death by a man in psychosis, a tragedy still fresh in the minds of many.

Findings from a coronial inquest into the incident were due to be delivered this week, but were delayed after two gunmen unleashed a hail of bullets on an event marking the start of the Jewish festival of Hanukkah eight days ago.

Declared a terror attack by police, 15 people were shot and killed, including a 10-year-old girl who still had face paint curling around her eyes.

The first paramedic to confront the bloody scenes at the Chanukah by the Sea event was also the first paramedic on the scene at the Westfield stabbings.

“You just wouldn’t even fathom that something like this would happen,” 31-year-old Mary, who is originally from the UK, tells the BBC. “I say constantly to my family at home how safe it is here.”

This was the overarching sentiment in the days following the shooting. This kind of thing, mass murder, just doesn’t happen in Australia.

But it can and it has – twice, in the same community, within 18 months.

A sea of flowers left by shocked and grieving people at Bondi is being packed up. A national day of reflection is over. On Sunday night, Jewish Australians lit candles for the last time this Hannukah.

But the two tragedies have left scores physically scarred and traumatised, and the nation’s sense of safety shattered.

‘Everyone knows someone affected’

EPA Photos of victims of the deadly shooting at Bondi BeachEPA

Funerals for the victims have drawn thousands of mourners this week

Bondi is Australia’s most famous beach – a globally recognised symbol of its way of life.

It’s also a quintessential slice of Australian community. There’s a bit of “everyone knows everyone” – and that means everyone knows someone affected by the 14 December tragedy, mayor Will Nemesh told the BBC.

“One of the first people I texted was [Rabbi] Eli Schlanger. And I said, ‘I hope you’re OK. Call me if you need anything’,” he said.

But the British-born father of five, also known as the “Bondi Rabbi”, was among the dead.

The first responders, police and paramedics would have been working on members of their own community. Others had the task of having to treat the shooters who had taken aim at their colleagues.

“[Westfield Bondi Junction] was horrendous, something we’re certainly not used to. And then this again was massive, catastrophic injuries,” Ryan Park, health minister for New South Wales, told the BBC.

“They’ve seen things that are like you would see in a war zone… You don’t get those images out of your head,” Park added.

Mayor Nemesh fears this will forever be a stain on Bondi, and Australia.

“If this can happen here at Bondi Beach, it really could happen anywhere… the impact has reverberated around Australia.”

EPA NSW Minister for Health Ryan Park places flowers at a memorial at Bondi BeachEPA

Ryan Park says healthcare workers will take time to recover from what they’ve seen

‘Warnings ignored’

No one is feeling this more than the Jewish community, for whom Bondi has become a sanctuary.

“I swam here every day for years on end, rain or shine. And this week… I couldn’t get in the water. It didn’t feel right. It felt sacrilegious in some way,” Zac Seidler, a local clinical psychologist, told the BBC.

Many of the victims of the attack moved here over many decades for safety from persecution, including 89-year-old Holocaust survivor Alex Kleytman. Instead, his life was bookended by violent acts of antisemitic hate.

Mr Seidler has spent the past two years trying to convince his grandparents, who are also Holocaust survivors, to hold on to their belief in the good of humanity.

“[My grandmother] kept saying, ‘These are the signs. I’ve seen this before’. And I just kept saying, ‘Not in Australia, not here. You’re safe’, just trying to soothe her.

“But now I kind of feel like the fool.”

No community is a monolith, but one thing many Jewish Australians believe is that warnings about a rise of antisemitism in the months preceding this attack were ignored.

The year started with a spate of vandalism and arson incidents on Jewish marks in the suburbs surrounding Bondi. It has ended with mass murder targeting their community.

Watch: Jewish Australians on why Bondi is a ‘sanctuary’ for them

There has been resistance in the face of fear – some leaders urging Jewish Australians to double down, be more publicly Jewish and display their religious symbols with pride.

One woman perusing the flowers outside the Bondi Pavilion on Sunday admits she is too scared to do that. It took her all week to even work up the courage to visit this site, which is just metres from where many of the victims died.

“I’ve never felt my Jewishness before. I’ve never experienced antisemitism in my whole life until now,” MaryAnne says. “And now, I don’t want to wear my Star of David.”

Community, anger and sadness

The shooting triggered a massive outpouring of support from around the nation.

When the news broke, many in the community rallied to help.

Lifeguards – volunteer and paid – put their lives on the line. Restaurants opened their doors and hid people in their store rooms and freezers, and locals ushered lost children into their apartments.

Even the New South Wales opposition leader Kellie Sloane – also the local state member – was at the scene, helping pack bullet wounds.

In the days after the shooting, thousands of ordinary Australians lined up – many for hours on end – to donate blood desperately needed to treat those injured.

Each day, a carpet of petals, handwritten notes, commemorative stones and candles grew out from the gates of the Bondi Pavilion.

Bee motifs – stickers, balloons, even pavement art – are all over the suburb, in remembrance of Matilda, the terror attack’s youngest victim.

Surfers and swimmers on Friday paddled out beyond Bondi’s iconic breaks to honour those who died.

A day later, surf livesavers and lifeguards stood shoulder to shoulder on the beach in solidarity with the Jewish community.

But amid the platitudes, sadness and shock is calcifying into anger and tension.

Surfers and swimmers pay tribute to victims of Bondi shooting

Last year’s Bondi Junction stabbings were devastating for the community – but a shared resolution united it.

Experts say the attacker, who had schizophrenia, was in psychosis at the time of the stabbings, and his family have previously said he was frustrated at being unable to find a girlfriend. The question of whether he targeted women will likely forever go unanswered. But clear failures in the mental health system have been identified.

Last month, families of the victims asked the coroner to refer the doctor who weaned him off medication with limited supervision to regulators for investigation, and they have also argued for a massive boost to mental health service funding.

But last Sunday’s events raise more uncomfortable feelings and questions.

There is palpable fury at the government, over a perceived – and admitted – failure to do more to stop antisemitism. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been booed during public appearances this week, and talking to people visiting the site of the attack in Bondi, it isn’t uncommon to hear them demand his resignation.

Many people the BBC spoke to pointed to his government’s decision to recognise Palestinian statehood, alongside countries including the UK and Canada, and regular protests in Australia by members of the pro-Palestinian movement, which though largely peaceful but have been peppered with antisemitic chants and placards.

The state of New South Wales – which has in recent years tightened protest rules – has already announced it will introduce more legislation cracking down on “hateful” chants and give police more powers to investigate demonstrators. The federal government has promised similar.

The blame apportioned to these protests does not sit right with many, even some sections of the Jewish community.

“We need to hold multiple truths,” Mr Seidler says. “We can be afraid, we can feel that there is deep antisemitic rhetoric going on in certain circles within Australia… while also understanding that there is a right of people in this country – especially Muslim Australians – to be concerned about what is taking place in Gaza.

“We need to get better at finding that line and calling out when that line has been crossed.”

Getty Images A boy wearing a kippah and draped in an Israeli flag walks in BondiGetty Images

Many Jewish Australians are angry at the government

For others, there is anger at what they feel is the politicisation of a tragedy.

“It’s a bloody photo op,” one woman tells me on Sunday, as a prominent Australian businesswoman arrives and begins posing with the floral tributes outside the Bondi Pavilion.

Some – including the local federal MP Allegra Spender – worry the attack is being used to fuel anti-immigration sentiment.

“We would not have had the man who saved so many Australians if we had cut off, for instance, Muslim immigration,” she said.

Mr Seidler says these arguments fail to recognise that antisemitic views – and other forms of bigotry – are formed here too.

“I heard someone say the other day that Australia thinks it’s on a holiday from history, that we’re somehow immune to this stuff, that it’s not bred here, it’s imported,” Mr Seidler says.

With the anger, there is also fear: for the Jewish community of other attacks, for the Muslim community of retaliation for an act of terror they have loudly condemned.

There are questions over how Australia’s security agency fumbled an alleged terrorist who at one point was on their watch list, prompting a review into federal police and intelligence agencies that was announced on Sunday.

There is frustration at NSW Police, who have for years been warned by the Muslim community of hate preachers poaching their young men.

There is animosity towards the media, driven by hurt among both Jewish and Arab Australians over a belief they and their communities have been misrepresented, and frustration at what some feel is incitement against them.

But there is also a queasiness at the treatment of traumatised victims throughout this week, some of whom were interviewed live on television while the blood of their friends still stained their hands.

Through it all, is an undercurrent of suspicion of institutions and each other.

There are varying opinions on how those rifts can heal – or even if they can. But there is a shared determination to try.

EPA Rabbi Yehoram Ulman, the father-in-law of Rabbi Eli Schlanger, one of the prominent victims of the Bondi Beach Massacre, addresses people during the National Day of Reflection vigil and commemoration for the victims and survivors of the Bondi Massacre at Bondi Beach EPA

Rabbi Yehoram Ulman has called for unity and love

One UK expat who was at the beach at the time of the shooting says everyone he speaks to is adamant this will not change Bondi, or Australia.

“It’s seriously unique what you have as a nation… there’s a magic about it,” Henry Jamieson tells the BBC.

“I’m traumatised… and I’m going to have to deal with that for the rest of my life, I know I am… even people who weren’t there were traumatised.

“But I’m not gonna let it shake me and we will not let it shake this community.

“You can’t let them win,” he says of the alleged terrorists.

At an emotional memorial on Sunday night, seven days since the attack, the same sense of defiance was on show. It ended with the lighting of the menorah, something the crowds gathered for Hannukah last week never got to do.

The shamash, the centre candle, was lit by the father of Ahmed al Ahmed, in honour of his bravery in wrestling a gun off one of the attackers. The children of the two rabbis who were killed lit another. Others were lit by a representative of surf lifesavers and a Jewish community medic who rushed to the scene and began treating the injured before the shots had even stopped. The final candle was lit by Michael, the father of Matilda, who has been described a fountain of joy to all who knew her.

After the parade of diverse Australians had sparked flames on each arm of the menorah, Rabbi Yehoram Ulman of Bondi Chabad made a plea for more love and more unity.

“Returning to normal is not enough,” he said.

“Sydney can and must become a beacon of goodness. A city where people look out for one another, where kindness is louder than hate, where decency is stronger than fear, and we can make it happen,” he said, stopping for a moment as the crowd applauded.

“But only if we take the feelings we have right now and turn them into action, into continuous action.”


www.bbc.com

Continue Reading

Trending