Politics
Godfatherism: Rivers, Kano in political turmoil as Kwankwaso, Wike battle govs
Ahead of the 2027 general elections, some state governors seeking re-elections are currently facing hurdles after falling out with their political godfathers.
While some of the governors, especially in the opposition parties found shelter in the All Progressives Congress, APC-led federal government ahead of 2027, their godfathers were left behind.
Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara and his Kano State counterpart, Abba Yusuf, fell out with their political godfathers following their decisions to join APC.
The face-off is posing a threat to their re-election bid as the godfathers vowed to remain a stumbling block.
DAILY POST reports that while Governor Fubara is locked in rivalry with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, Governor Abba Yusuf is in battle with his estranged godfather, Rabiu Kwankwaso, who is the leader of the New Nigerian Peoples Party, NNPP.
Kwankwaso vs Yusuf
Governor Abba Yusuf and Rabiu Kwankwaso, the 2023 presidential candidate of the NNPP recently fell out over the governor’s decision to join the ruling party.
DAILY POST reports that although the governor has yet to make a public declaration about his defection, his aides and members of the State House of Assembly have confirmed his plans to leave the NNPP for APC.
Governor Yusuf obviously won the 2023 gubernatorial election due to the overwhelming support from the Kwankwassiyya Movement-led by the NNPP leader himself.
The support is currently being withdrawn following Yusuf’s decision to quit the NNPP.
DAILY POST gathered at the weekend that several loyalists of the NNPP leader who are currently serving under Governor Yusuf are set to resign.
According to insiders, Mustapha Kwankwaso, who is currently serving as Kano State commissioner for youth and sport, will be vacating his office ahead of the governor’s imminent defection.
It was further learnt that at least seven other Kwankwaso’s loyalists will be dumping the governor’s cabinet immediately he joins the ruling party.
This is even as the NNPP was reported to have begun searching for Yusuf’s replacement ahead of the 2027 election.
Wike vs Fubara
Since the 2023 general election, Rivers Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, has fallen out with his predecessor Nyesom Wike for at least three times.
The latest feud between the duo was birthed by the governor’s move to align with the ruling party and his alleged decision to renege on a reported agreement facilitated between them by President Bola Tinubu during the State of Emergency in Rivers.
Although the agreement was not made public, reports indicate that the governor signed an agreement during the peace deal not to run for a second term.
However, since his defection to the ruling party, there have been moves suggesting the governor’s readiness to be re-elected, having the backing of top APC leaders.
Meanwhile, Wike was in Rivers State for 17 days touring the 23 Local Government Areas of the state in a bid to recapture the state’s political structure ahead of 2027.
The former governor vowed that Governor Fubara will not be re-elected, pointing out that his (Wike) political career may end if the governor returns in 2027.
Impeachment plot
Members of the Rivers State House of Assembly loyal to the FCT Minister are not waiting till 2027 to remove the governor as they initiated the impeachment of the governor and his deputy Ngozi Odu.
The assembly served the impeachment notice to the governor and his deputy on Thursday, alleging gross misconduct.
They accused the governor of spending Rivers State money illegally, pointing out Fubara’s alleged refusal to present the 2026 budget to the assembly.
However, speaking with DAILY POST, the immediate past publicity secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in Rivers State, Sydney Gbara, who described the impeachment move as an unnecessary distraction, argued that the 2025 budget was passed by the National Assembly during the emergency rule.
He said, “It’s an unnecessary distraction in the state because when an action is repeatedly taking place with no just reason, you will begin to question the motive behind it.
“One of the key things the assembly members are accusing the governor of, was about the 2025 budget which we all know that the National Assembly passed the budget in June last year during the emergency rule and it was assented by Mr President.
“Every budget has one year life span, meaning that the budget passed by the National Assembly will remain in force until July this year”.
According to him, Governor Fubara cannot represent a budget already passed and assented by the president.
dailypost.ng
Politics
Court shifts legal battle over APC Delta South ticket over INEC’s absence
The legal battle for the 2027 election ticket of the All Progressives Congress, APC, for Delta South Senatorial seat was on Monday shifted again by the Federal High Court in Abuja due to the absence of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.
At Monday’s proceedings, when the suit instituted by a former Chairman of the Delta State Oil Producing Areas Development Commission, DESOPADEC, Prince Micheal Diden, was to be heard, Justice Mohammed Umar, put it off till Wednesday, to enable the electoral body appear in court to present its own position.
It would be recalled that this is the third time INEC would be absent in court. The commission has also not filed any process in respect of the matter.
During the proceedings, Bankole Joel Akomolafe, SAN, appeared for the plaintiff, while Lukman Fagbemi, SAN, announced appearance for Senator Joel Onowakpo and Habeeb Lawal stood for the APC.
Lead counsel to the plaintiff, told the judge that he had filed his reply to the two sets of statements of defense of Senator Onowakpo and APC and that he had served same on them as 1st and 2nd defendants.
Akomolafe however, noted that the electoral body was still not in court despite the service of the originating summons on it to enable it file its defense.
The senior lawyer said that in view of the critical importance of INEC to the suit, he would concede to an adjournment till Wednesday to allow the electoral body be in court.
He also announced to the court that the two video recordings on the conduct of the primary election would be played in the open court to enable the court arrive at a just conclusion.
Based on the agreement of lawyers Justice Umar, shifted the hearing till July 8, with an order that a fresh hearing date should be communicated to the INEC.
Ejele, a former Chairman of Sapele Local Government Area of Delta State commenced the legal battle against the 1st defendant’s (Senator Joel Onowakpo) declaration as winner of the APC’s primary election in the Delta South Senatorial District, held on May 18, 2026.
The plaintiff in the suit marked: FHC/ ABJ/CS/1094/2026 is claiming that he secured the highest number of votes cast at the primary election and should be declared candidate of the APC for the Delta South Senatorial District election, slated for January next year.
He is among others asking the court to declare him winner of the May 18, Direct Primary election conducted for the selection of the APC’s candidate for the 2027 senatorial election in the district, on grounds that he scored the highest votes cast at the poll.
In the Writ of Summons filed on his behalf by his team of lawyers led by Mr Bankole Joel Akomolafe, SAN, the plaintiff accused the 1st defendant of manipulation and announcement of forged and fake results.
Diden in the statement of claim stated that the National Working Committee of the APC who organised the aforesaid Primary Election announced the established procedures for the announcement of the result of the said election; that the collation and announcement of results would be conducted exclusively in an official briefing at Abuja after the submission of all results.
He averred that contrary to the instructions the 1st defendant immediately ran to various media to pronounce himself the winner of the APC Direct Primary Election for the Delta South Senatorial District, Delta State held on Monday, May 18, 2026, thereby allegedly misinforming the public and particularly members of the Senatorial District of the Plaintiff.
“The 1st Defendant connived and colluded with his cohorts to write forged results where he falsely declare himself the winner of the election, he did not only publish the forged results of the 8 Local Government Areas under the Delta South Senatorial District, Delta State in the various media, he also recorded his cohorts publicly declaring the false result in a video that has gone viral to mislead the people contrary to what actually transpired on the day of election where the plaintiff defeated the 1st Defendant with a wide margin”, he claimed.
Plaintiff further averred that the 1st Defendant made the aforesaid representations fraudulently in that he knew they were false or were reckless, not caring that they were true or false notwithstanding the monitoring of the 3rd Defendant officials at the election.
“Contrary to the above declaration of the false results announced by the 1st Defendant in the viral video pleaded above, the Plaintiff through his agents in all the wards of the 8 Local Government Areas within the Delta South Senatorial District, Delta State have the authentic results of each ward intact in which the Plaintiff defeated the 1st Defendant with a wide margin scoring 96,893 (Ninety Six Thousand, Eight Hundred and Ninety Three) votes as against the 1st Defendant’s 31,918(Thirty One Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighteen) votes respectively”, he said.
The plaintiff added that sequel to the above unequivocal and overwhelming victory he won at the poll the “leaders, stakeholders, elders, women, youths and registered members of the APC in the Senatorial District wrote a formal petition to the party’s national headquarters to denounce and reject the fraudulent declaration of the 1st Defendant as the winner of the election”.
He added that his lawyers had written a similar complaint “about the desperate manipulation and the announcement of fake results of Monday, May 18, 2026 election by the 1st Defendant to the National Chairman of the 2nd Defendant.
“The Plaintiff avers that the 1st Defendant by his actions has not only embarrassed all the contestants of the election but has also cast aspersion on the entire election process, unless this Honourable Court grants the reliefs of the Plaintiff and put the record straight for all observers”.
Among reliefs he is seeking from the court are; a declaration that the Plaintiff being the aspirant who scored the highest number of valid votes cast at the APC Primary Election for the Delta South Senatorial District, Delta State held on Monday, May 18, 2026 and having satisfied the requirements of the Constitution, Electoral Act, 2026 and the APC’s Direct Primaries Guidelines and Procedures, be declared the winner and he should be declared as the Candidate of the APC in the 2027 general elections of Delta South Senatorial District, Delta State in Nigeria.
He is also seeking an order directing the APC to immediately forward his name to INEC as the APC’s candidate for Delta South Senatorial District in the 2027 general elections.
Diden is also praying for an order directing INEC to accept and/or receive his name from the APC as the party’s candidate in the 2017 senatorial election in Delta South Senatorial District.
dailypost.ng
Politics
Why Peter Obi cannot become Nigeria’s president — Segalink
Social commentator and human rights activist, Segun Awosanya, popularly known as Segalink, has said the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, lacks the qualities required to lead Nigeria, arguing that his politics is divisive and driven by what he described as an online “mob.”
Awosanya made the remarks during an interview on Vanguard’s Politics Hub, where he spoke on the state of the nation, the 2027 general election and Obi’s presidential ambition.
Describing the former Anambra State governor, Segalink said Obi had built his political appeal around public anger rather than national leadership.
“It is obvious to the blind and audible to the deaf, that somebody who is playing to the gallery, who postures as one thing and is actually another should be revealed for who they are,” he said.
“As far as I’m concerned, Peter Obi is just a leader of the mob, somebody who is surfing the wave of the angry people… to demonize people and blackmail people in order to gain attention to themselves, and then bully themselves into political power.”
Responding to a question on whether his criticism stemmed from his perceived disagreement with Obi’s supporters, Awosanya dismissed the suggestion, saying he had no personal conflict with the Obidient movement.
“There’s no friction between me and anybody. I don’t even recognize them as anything. I’m focused on what I’m doing,” he said.
He alleged that members of the Obidient movement attempted to hijack the #EndSARS protests for political purposes.
“If you look at the antecedent of the Obidient group, they were one of the cancerous nodes within the EndSARS advocacy… they wanted to use the movement for their own game. And when they failed, they demonised everybody within the system,” he claimed.
Awosanya also explained why he had previously spoken positively about Obi before becoming one of his critics.
“When I commended Peter Obi, I commended him because he was at the time speaking to issues that border on vulnerable individuals in the country,” he said, adding that his earlier comments were “not promotion” but an observation.
He, however, maintained that Obi was unfit for the presidency because of what he described as his divisive political record.
“When I eventually conclude that he cannot be president is because of his divisiveness… He brought Christians against Catholics when he was governor, and he did a lot of things that he’s preaching against today. Evidence are there,” Awosanya said.
He further argued that widespread narratives on social media should not be mistaken for facts, adding, “The fact that the lie is viral doesn’t make it the truth.”
www.vanguardngr.com
Politics
Gov Adeleke, Osun APC renew dispute over security after IGP’s fact-finding visit
Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke and the All Progressives Congress, APC, have renewed their exchange over security and policing in the state.
The latest disagreement is coming after the recent fact-finding visit of the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to the state ahead of the August 15 governorship election.
In a statement issued on Monday by his spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed, Governor Adeleke, who said residents expected impartial policing before, during and after the election, urged the police to implement measures that would guarantee fairness and public confidence.
The governor commended the Inspector-General’s visit, saying it provided an opportunity for all political parties and community stakeholders to present their positions on the security situation in the state.
According to Adeleke, “the discussions during the visit should guide the immediate implementation of agreed measures aimed at ensuring non-partisan law enforcement across Osun State.
“We appreciate the visit of the Inspector General of Police and that of the Deputy Inspector General a week earlier. The facts are out in the public domain. The IGP has heard and read from both parties.”
Adeleke added that the Commissioner of Police in Osun should remain impartial in the investigation and prosecution of cases of political violence adding that such an approach was necessary to sustain public confidence in the police.
“We seek the arrest of any law breaker irrespective of their political affiliation. Those who commit crimes should be arrested and prosecuted. We harbour no thugs in Government House or anywhere,” he stated.
The governor also called on security agencies to provide a secure environment for voters, adding that killings and attacks were not conducive to the exercise of democratic rights. He pledged his administration’s continued support for security agencies while insisting that the government sought only fair, impartial policing.
Meanwhile, the Osun APC said the Inspector-General’s remarks during his visit supported its earlier allegation that individuals accused of criminal activities were being sheltered within the Osun Government House.
In a statement signed by the party’s Director of Media and Information, Kola Olabisi, the APC claimed that the Inspector-General had directed the Osun State Commissioner of Police, Ibrahim Gotan, to professionally address the allegation.
The opposition party alleged that, “any police action should extend beyond the Government House if investigations required it. Suspected political hoodlums had been shielded from arrest.”
The APC also criticised comments previously made by Osun State Commissioner for Information, Kolapo Alimi, describing his response to the Inspector-General’s remarks as “misplaced” and a mere afterthought.
The party accused the state government of politicising security matters and insisted that law enforcement agencies should thoroughly investigate all allegations relating to political violence in the state.
dailypost.ng
-
Sports16 hours agoNeymar’s Comment to Norway Goalkeeper Orjan Nyland After Scoring Penalty
-
Sports1 day agoMexico vs England Referee Already Made World Cup Blunder
-
Sports2 days agoJoe Hart Slams ‘Disgrace’ France vs Paraguay Referee
-
Sports2 days agoVozinha Reveals What Lionel Messi Told Him After Argentina 3-2 Cape Verde
-
Sports17 hours agoZlatan Ibrahimovic Causes Big Stir With Reaction to FIFA Suspending Folarin Balogun’s One-Game Ban
-
Sports18 hours agoMario Balotelli Names One Footballer Better Than Lionel Messi
-
Sports7 hours agoMexican Media Cast Verdict on England After Chaotic World Cup Win
-
Sports8 hours agoEngland Fans Praise ‘Animal’ Anthony Gordon vs Mexico
