Connect with us

Politics

Court Judgment on Deregistration: Adeleke’s re-election bid in jeopardy — APC mocks

Published

on


The Osun State All Progressives Congress, APC, Governorship Campaign Council has said the judgment of the Federal High Court derecognising the Accord has cast doubt on Governor Ademola Adeleke’s re-election bid in the August 15, 2026 governorship election.

In a statement issued on Tuesday by the Head of its Media and Publicity Committee, Oluremi Omowaiye, the council claimed it had taken note of the court’s decision and the directive to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to take necessary steps in compliance with the judgment.

The APC campaign council said it respected the authority of the court and the principles of constitutional democracy, adding that the ruling carried significant implications for Adeleke, who is seeking a second term on the platform of the Accord Party.

“Unless and until the decision of the Federal High Court is set aside by a competent appellate court, Governor Ademola Adeleke will not be contesting the August 15, 2026 the governorship election in Osun State under the banner of Accord,” the statement read.

The council stated that the judgment could affect other candidates sponsored by the party for state and national legislative positions, maintaining that the development represented a major setback for the governor’s political future.

According to the APC, “aside from the Federal High Court ruling, there are ongoing legal disputes over the national leadership of the Accord Party. If the courts eventually recognise an opposing faction, INEC could be unable to accept Adeleke as the party’s validly nominated governorship candidate.

“The crisis over the authentic leadership of the party is yet to be conclusively resolved. The governor’s political challenges stemmed from unresolved legal issues that predated his entry into the party.”

The statement also claimed that Adeleke’s possible absence from the ballot would deny voters the opportunity to assess his administration at the polls. 

APC alleged that residents have experienced economic hardship, challenges in the education and health sectors, and job losses under the current administration.

The campaign council accused the Adeleke administration of mismanaging public resources and alleged that several projects and financial transactions carried out by the government would require scrutiny in the future.

While mentioning the N99.5 billion Ede Airport project, the alleged diversion of a N2 billion Federal Government grant for buses, payments to alleged ghost workers and the management of public revenue, it insisted that accountability would remain an issue regardless of the outcome of the governorship race.

“Even if Governor Adeleke escapes the verdict of the electorate because he is disqualified from the race, he cannot escape the long arm of justice and the inevitable demand for accountability,” the statement added.

The APC campaign council urged residents of Osun State to remain peaceful, vigilant and committed to democratic principles ahead of the August 15 of the governorship election.




dailypost.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Deregistration: Judiciary, not ADC on trial over — David Mark

Published

on

By



ADC

By Luminous Jannamike

ABUJA – The National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Senator David Mark, has said that the Nigerian judiciary, rather than the ADC, is currently on trial over the controversy surrounding the deregistration of the party and four others.

The Federal High Court recently ordered the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties, sparking strong reactions from the affected parties and renewed debate about judicial independence and the state of Nigeria’s democracy.

Speaking at the ADC Strategic Communications Retreat in Abuja on Tuesday, the former Senate President criticised Justice Peter Lifu’s handling of matters involving the party, describing recent judicial actions as unprecedented.

According to Mark, contrary to public perception, the ADC is not the institution under scrutiny.

“The ADC is not on trial. Rather, it is the judiciary that is on trial and the nation is waiting to see how the National Judicial Council (NJC) is going to handle this precarious situation,” he said.

He expressed concern over what he described as unusual judicial conduct, saying it was inconceivable that Justice Lifu, or any judge for that matter, would allow himself to be used for what he termed a “hatchet job”, including, he alleged, disregarding an order of the Court of Appeal staying proceedings in the case.

Mark also faulted what he described as contradictory judicial orders, alleging that Justice Lifu directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to pronounce the ADC dead and then, less than 24 hours later, presided over proceedings involving the same party in the Nafiu Gombe case.

“It is strange that a judge can order the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to pronounce a party dead and in less than 24 hours put the same party on trial,” he said.

The ADC chairman, however, urged party members not to be discouraged by the development, which he attributed to alleged machinations by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

“Like I have said previously, our members should not worry about the shenanigans of the ruling party. We will go through all these turbulence because we are up to the task. By the time we are through all these, ADC will come out stronger,” he stated.

He also accused the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of attempting to distract the opposition, claiming the APC-led government was “sinking”.

Addressing participants at the retreat, the former Senate President charged the party’s communication strategists to develop messages capable of persuading members of the APC, including President Bola Tinubu himself, to support the ADC.

The remarks were contained in a statement signed by Kola Ologbondiyan, Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to the ADC National Chairman.

The post Deregistration: Judiciary, not ADC on trial over — David Mark appeared first on Vanguard News.


www.vanguardngr.com

Continue Reading

Politics

Governance not rocket science — Peter Obi faults Tinubu’s policies

Published

on

By



Jos Visit: Tinubu said 'No light; I fly out in 10 minutes' - Peter Obi

By Enitan Abdultawab

The presidential candidate of Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has said Nigeria’s challenges can be addressed through deliberate policies, investments in human capital and inclusive governance, insisting that effective governance is “not rocket science.”

Obi made the remarks during an interview on the Nevon HQ podcast hosted by broadcaster Rufai Oseni, where he outlined how he would tackle poverty, unemployment and economic stagnation if given the opportunity to lead the country.

According to him, national transformation must begin with fostering unity and a sense of belonging among citizens.

“I will start transformation by uniting this country, bringing it together to be a country everybody will be proud of.

“These things are not rocket science. Countries across the world have done this. What they did is simple. I will deliver good governance to people,” he said

He added that his administration would focus on social inclusion and poverty reduction through strategic investments in key sectors of the economy.

“I will ensure social inclusion and reduce the level of poverty. To do this, we will invest in critical areas of development such as education,” he stated.

Obi argued that countries around the world have demonstrated that development is achievable when governments prioritize the right policies and sectors.

The former Anambra State governor also stressed the need to equip young Nigerians with practical skills, saying technical and vocational training would be a major component of his development agenda.

“We must ensure that people go through technical training,” he said.

Drawing lessons from Indonesia, Obi noted that small businesses remain the backbone of many successful economies and deserve greater attention from policymakers.

“In Indonesia, for instance, there are ministries of micro, small and medium businesses. Ninety per cent of individuals come from this level,” he said, emphasizing the importance of supporting entrepreneurs and small-scale enterprises.

The former Labour Party presidential candiate also said his policy proposals would be clearly outlined in his party’s manifesto, which he disclosed would be released soon.

“You will see our manifesto; the party will soon release it,” he said.

Obi also revisited the contentious issue of fuel subsidy removal, maintaining that while he would have ended the subsidy regime, he would have approached the process differently.

“I would have removed subsidy, but in an organized manner. I would not have announced it on inauguration day. I would have sat down with experts before I made the decision,” he said.

The former presidential candidate questioned the impact of the Federal Government’s economic reforms on ordinary Nigerians, arguing that policy decisions should ultimately improve citizens’ living conditions.

“Now that he (President Tinubu) has removed subsidy and deregulated the naira, what is the impact on average Nigerians?” Obi asked.

He maintained that Nigeria’s economic and social challenges require practical solutions rather than complex theories, insisting that good governance, investment in education, skills development and support for small businesses remain the keys to national development.

The post Governance not rocket science — Peter Obi faults Tinubu’s policies appeared first on Vanguard News.


www.vanguardngr.com

Continue Reading

Politics

BREAKING: Appeal Court suspends execution of judgment on deregistration of ADC, 4 others

Published

on

By


The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ordered the stay of execution of the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja which on Monday deregistered the African Democratic Congress, ADC, and four other political parties.

The controversial judgment which directed the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to deregister the African Democratic Congress, ADC, and four other political parties was ordered not to be executed

In a unanimous decision, a three-member panel of the appellate court led by Justice Abubakar Mohammed, accused Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja of flouting an order it made on May 22, which directed him to suspend proceedings before him. 

The appellate court held that Justice Lifu’s action amounted to an affront, judicial rascally on the hierarchy of courts. 

It held that the lower court’s action was “the highest form of judicial impertinence,” stressing that the Supreme Court previously held that a judge who acted in such manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This Court has supervisory authority over the trial court. The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution.

“This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are made. 

“The application for a stay of execution is hereby granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the appellate court held. 

The Court of Appeal fixed June 25, for the definite hearing of the substantive appeal. 

It will be recalled that aside from the ADC, the other parties the high court directed INEC to deregister are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

According to the court, the five political parties failed to meet the constitutional requirements to warrant their continued existence and participation in future elections.

It barred INEC from further according recognition to the parties, accepting nominations of candidates from the affected parties, or giving effect to their activities for the purpose of participating in the 2027 general elections.

Moreover, Justice Lifu ordered the defendants to stop parading themselves as registered political parties in the country. He held that there was merit in a suit filed against them by the National Forum of Former Legislators, NFFL.

The group, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, prayed the court to determine whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove political parties that fail to meet the electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations.

It was the position of the plaintiff that the five political parties listed as defendants had persistently failed to meet the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration.

The former legislators stressed that the requirements include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state, or local government level.

They told the court that the ADC and the four other parties performed poorly in both the 2023 general elections and by-elections conducted by INEC, thereby failing to win seats across key tiers of government.

The litigants insisted that the continued existence of the ADC and the other defendants as recognised political parties is unlawful and undermines the integrity of the country’s electoral system.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Trending