Politics
2027: Court reserves judgment in INEC’s appeal on election guidelines
The Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal has reserved judgement in two separate appeals over the timetable for the conduct of the 2027 elections released by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.
Justice Adebukola Bankole, who led the panel that heard the appeals, reserved judgement in the the cases.
The judge said the date of the judgement will be communicated to parties in the appeal
Two political parties, Youth Party of Nigeria, YPN, and Social Democratic Party, SDP, had approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, to nullify the timetable released for the elections by INEC.
While Justice Mohammed Umar granted the reliefs sought in the suit by YPN and nullified the election guidelines released by INEC, Justice James Omotosho, in the suit filed by SDP, granted some reliefs in favour of the party and some others in favour of the electoral umpire.
Not satisfied by the two judgments, INEC approached the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgments of Justice Umar and parts of the judgement of Justice Omotosho which limits its power regarding the elections.
Dr Alex Izinyon, SAN, led two other SANs from INEC to argue the appeals.
Izinyon in his submission before the court contended that INEC has the power as provided by the law under the provisions of the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act to issue guidelines.
Izinyon said, “The Constitution, specifically, empowered INEC to organize, supervise and undertake elections and other political activities as provided and that the timetable provided is in consonance with the power donated by the 1999 Constitution and the enabling act for INEC to do what it did in issuing elections timetables.
“The trial court erred in law because it failed to interpret, using the Supreme Court authorities and Court of Appeal decisions on the power already donated by the 1999 Constitution to INEC to arrange for elections including pre-election matters.
“Supreme Court and Court of Appeal have held that INEC has the power to organize and supervise elections and this include timetable for elections to carry out political activities preceeding the elections.
“The trial court failed to give effect to the phrase “not later than 120days and not more than 90days”, which was a subject of contention at the trial court and that not less than 120 days means it should not be more than but it can be less than but for the court to say that it must be exactly 120days, was too mathematical and not the intendment of the lawmakers as any of the activities can be done before the 120days and not more than. For the trial court to say it must be exactly 120 days is a mechanical application of the statue which is contrary to the decisions of the apex court and the Court of Appeal.”
He said the same goes for the 90 days provisions adding that the reliefs sought by the respondent at the trial court were declarative in nature. “There was no evidence by way of affidavit to show that they have commenced any primary or taken steps or that they have suffered any injury. Therefore the Court ought not to have granted any relief.
“The second appeal was filed by SDP in a judgement delivered by Justice James Omotosho, who granted some reliefs to the SDP and granted some also to the INEC.
“INEC appealed part of the judgement in that case which limits their powers by saying that the days were short by few numbers of days that INEC should go back and rectify this,” Izinyon added.
Before the main appeal was argued, Izinyon moved three applications, one of which urged the court to close the door against YPN on the ground that the party failed to file its respondent brief after service of the appellant briefs on them five days.
He argued that the court should hold that they have no written briefs in opposition to the appellants briefs as they are prohibited by paragraph 13 of the practice direction of the pre-election proceedings issued by the President of the Court of Appeal, which states that no time shall be extended for default under the same paragraph.
YPN counsel, Akinwale Irokosun, when asked by the panel if the party filed any response to the motion, answered in the negative.
The lead counsel later moved his application and the court reserved ruling to be delivered alongside the main appeal.
In the second motion the YPN counsel prayed the court for an extension of time to file the respondent brief out of time but the application was opposed by the INEC lead counsel, Izinyon, on the ground that there is no extension of time to file respondent brief when the time provided by the rules has elapsed.
Izinyon cited a plethoria of Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases to back his argument, that no discretion can be exercised in that regard once you fail to file respondent brief.
He said the third motion was an application that the purported brief was filed after they had received notice of hearing of the appellant brief saying that the motion was incompetent because there is no time that can be extended for them to file their brief.
According to him, the brief was incompetent because it was filed put of the five days period.
“The brief was more than the lawfully required 25-page limit provided by the rules as it was 37 pages,” Izinyon said.
dailypost.ng
Politics
2027: Atiku, Peter Obi haven’t put any efforts in place to unseat Tinubu – Rep member Gagdi
Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Navy, Hon. Yusuf Gagdi, has explained why the former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, lack the required political capacity to defeat President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Gagdi, who said the ruling All Progressives Congress noted that the APC is far ahead of the opposition in political mobilisation, insisted that he had seen nothing to suggest that either Atiku or Obi was preparing effectively to unseat the president.
“I have never, in my political imagination, thought that my party, APC, would lose an election,” he said.
According to him, “What are the opposition doing? What are the opposition planning or doing? I have not seen, with the activities of the opposition, those you mentioned, Peter Obi or Atiku. I have not seen any effort being put in place by them to unseat or defeat the president come 2027. I would say this any day, anytime.”
Gagdi argued that the APC had maintained sustained political activities across the country, unlike opposition parties.
“You have seen APC’s activities in the last one year across Nigeria, in the four corners of Nigeria where our political activities are ten times the political activities of any opposition political party in Nigeria,” he said.
“So who is supposed to talk to another person about planning to win an election?”
The Plateau lawmaker dismissed suggestions that only opposition politicians were strategising ahead of the next general election.
“You think Bola Tinubu and the APC are not trying to win elections in 2027? Atiku and Obi have always been defeated,” he stated.
Gagdi maintained that political parties naturally prepare for elections, saying it would be wrong to suggest that only opposition politicians were planning for 2027.
“If you think they are planning, what makes you think that the APC is not planning to win elections? Are we sleeping? What planning are they doing?” he asked.
The lawmaker also accused some opposition figures of exploiting the country’s security challenges for political advantage instead of offering practical solutions.
“From the tune of some people that are supposed to be leaders of this country when they are talking about what Nigerians are passing through, you will see it from them that they seem to appreciate the situation Nigeria is going through.”
“Instead of lamenting and proffering solutions, you lament and tie it to the fact that government is defective in solving that problem just to achieve some political gain
DAILY POST reports that the African Democratic Congress and NDC have all confirmed that Atiku’s and Peter Obi’s credentials have been uploaded on the INEC portal ahead of the 2027 general elections. This means Tinubu, Atiku, and Peter Obi will have to slug it out in the 2027 election.
dailypost.ng
Politics
2027: INEC set to introduce downloadable PVCs, full online voter registration
The Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, is set to introduce “downloadable Permanent Voter Cards, PVCs” for voters who have misplaced or defaced their original cards.
The INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, disclosed this when he received the Director-General of National Orientation Agency, NOA, Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu, who paid a courtesy visit to the commission’s headquarters in Abuja on Wednesday
Amupitan explained that the new technology was part of ongoing efforts to modernise Nigeria’s electoral processes ahead of the 2027 general elections.
According to him, the downloadable PVC option will not be automatic or open to firm-time registrants who have never collected a physical card.
“It is not every PVC that is downloadable. You must have gotten your PVC before and it must be that the PVC is lost, defaced or if you cannot read your numbers there,” he stated.
He further stated that affected voters must formally lodge a complaint at least 90 days before an election to enable the commission to process the replacement.
Amupitan said that the commission would pilot the downloadable PVC technology during the off-cycle Osun governorship election in August.
He also disclosed that INEC was finalising work on a technology that would allow eligible citizens to complete their voter registration entirely online without visiting INEC offices for physical biometric capture.
“We have also been working on the technology that is going to make it possible for the registration of voters online without even having to visit INEC local government or registration areas.
“So hopefully in the next few days, we will be testing it as soon as the commission approves it,” he said.
Amupitan said that those advancements were aimed at eliminating the feeling of disenfranchisement among citizens and ensuring that everyone who desired to register could do so seamlessly.
dailypost.ng
Politics
Court adjourns APC Taraba chairmanship primary suit to July 22
The Federal High Court sitting in Jalingo, the Taraba State capital, has again adjourned the suit challenging the conduct and outcome of the All Progressives Congress (APC) chairmanship primary election to July 22, 2026.
The case, which seeks the nullification of the APC chairmanship primary election, came up before the court for definite hearing on Wednesday.
During the proceedings, the presiding judge, Justice Mashkur Salisu, adjourned the matter to allow for hearing on the originating summons filed by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff is asking the court to declare the chairmanship primary election invalid, alleging that the exercise did not comply with the provisions of the law and the party’s guidelines.
The suit is expected to determine the legality of the primary election and could have significant implications for the APC’s leadership in Taraba State.
Counsel to the parties were present in court and are expected to present their legal arguments when the matter resumes on the adjourned date.
The court fixed July 22, 2026, for hearing on the originating summons, when the substantive issues raised in the suit will be argued before the court.
The outcome of the case is being closely monitored by party members, political stakeholders and observers across the state, given its potential impact on the APC’s internal leadership structure and political activities in Taraba State.
dailypost.ng
-
Sports1 day agoKevin Pietersen Causes Stir With Tweet About His International Cricket Retirement
-
Sports1 day agoVirgil van Dijk Slammed For Comments After Netherlands’ World Cup Exit v Morocco
-
Sports1 day agoCarlo Ancelotti Explains Why He Didn’t Celebrate Brazil’s Winner v Japan
-
Sports1 day agoZlatan Ibrahimovic Blames Netherlands’ Shock World Cup Exit on Ronald Koeman
-
Sports1 day agoLeon Goretzka Slammed For Not Taking Penalty in Germany vs Paraguay
-
Sports1 day agoVirgil van Dijk Blasted For Not Taking a Penalty in Netherlands’ World Cup Exit v Morocco
-
Sports2 days agoFIFA Make Decision on Investigating 2026 World Cup ‘Match-Fixing’
-
Sports19 hours agoDiego Maradona Slammed New FIFA and USA World Cup Rule in 2018
