Connect with us

Politics

ADC crisis: Supreme Court has ended all hurdles – Kurugu, Mukhtar, others optimistic amid uncertainty

Published

on


On Thursday, Nigeria’s Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the leadership crisis rocking the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC).

In a unanimous decision delivered by a five-member panel led by Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba, the Supreme Court of Nigeria nullified an earlier directive of the Court of Appeal that had ordered parties to maintain the status quo.

The court held that the appellate court acted outside its jurisdiction after dismissing the appeal before it.

However, it did not explicitly state who the legitimate leader of the ADC is, instead directing all parties to return to the trial court for continuation of the case.

“It’s victory for Nigeria” — ADC chieftains

Reactions from political stakeholders suggest the judgment has boosted confidence in the ADC, but it has not conclusively positioned it as Nigeria’s leading opposition platform.

Speaking exclusively with DAILY POST after the ruling, Mansur Umar Kurugu, spokesperson II for the Kwankwasiyya Movement, described the ruling as a sign that justice still works.

“This gives us more confidence in our judicial system,” he said.

“It simply signals that no matter what, there are still institutions within this country which do not mortgage their integrity and their values,” he added.

Kurugu also criticised the electoral body, alleging bias.

“We have seen what INEC has been doing, with their chairman, who is perceived to be an APC member, trying to deny the opposition a chance to contest.”

He added that the judgment has renewed hope among citizens who rely on the courts.

However, another voice within the party disagreed with the idea that the ruling strengthens any faction.

According to Dumebi Kachikwu, neither side can claim victory.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Nigeria displayed King Solomon’s wisdom in refusing to be used as a tool of destabilisation by the David Mark-led group when it directed both factions to return to the trial court for continuation of the trial.”

His position suggests that the ADC remains divided, limiting its ability to immediately emerge as a unified opposition force.

Impact on coalition talks and 2027 preparations

Adnan Mukhtar, a former Kano State House of Assembly aspirant and ADC member, in an exclusive chat with DAILY POST, said he is optimistic about the party’s prospects despite the uncertainty.

“It is a very good development for the country. As you know, the ADC is the only opposition political party that is serious about challenging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and Nigerians all over the country are jubilating.

“People are happy. It is a wake-up call to the ADC to do the needful by fielding qualified, competent candidates in the forthcoming 2027 general elections.

“As you know, the judiciary is the last hope of the common man, and Today it has proven that it is indeed the last hope of the Nigerian opposition.”

Mukhtar added that the judgment opens the door for party activities.

The decision effectively allows the ADC to proceed with preparations such as primaries and the sale of nomination forms.

However, analysts have argued that without a final ruling on its leadership, coalition partners may remain cautious about fully committing to the party as a central opposition platform.

While the Supreme Court ruling has revived momentum within the ADC and reassured some opposition figures, the party will still continue its trial at the Federal High Court.

Nafi’u Bala makes claims

Reacting to the ruling in a chat with DCL Hausa, Nafi’u Bala, the man “holding the ADC on its toes,” said the David Mark faction is spreading propaganda to suit its desperation.

He said, “How does dismissing a case mean victory? I am the authentic ADC leader in Nigeria.

“I will fight this until we get our party back from people who ruined theirs.

“They are not ADC members; they are coalition members, that’s what we call them.”

Several ADC leaders, including Senator Aminu Waziri Tambuwal and Atiku Abubakar, have reacted to the ruling with cautious jubilation, reminding members that while it is a positive development, the legal battle is not yet over.




dailypost.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Only Wike-led PDP is recognised – Kelechi Anosike

Published

on

By


The governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abia State, Dr. Kelechi Anosike, has insisted that only the Wike-led faction of the PDP is recognised by law and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), dismissing the existence of any other faction of the party.

Anosike, while declaring his support for the faction aligned with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, argued that the other factions are not recognised by INEC and that it would be a waste of time to run under any of them.

“There are not two PDPs. We have only one PDP, and it is the one recognised by INEC, with Nyesom Wike as our national leader. The others have moved to different parties,” he said.

He also claimed that, in Abia State, he remains the only candidate of the party and that the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), and four other political parties have aligned with the PDP in a bid to unseat Governor Alex Otti in the 2027 governorship election.

Speaking on the performance of Governor Alex Otti, Anosike said the administration had failed to adequately cater to the needs of young people in the state. He claimed that many Abia residents, particularly youths, had abandoned the Labour Party and were now supporting the PDP ahead of the next election.

“The Abia State government has neglected the people, especially the youths. There is no meaningful programme targeted at them. About 75 per cent of the youths are with us, and more are joining every day.

“They have adopted our party. Nigerians will see endorsements from these parties and understand that we are serious,” he added.

Responding to claims that he is being sponsored by influential political figures, the PDP candidate dismissed the allegations, insisting that his ambition is driven solely by divine direction.

“Nobody sent me. It is the Almighty God who sent me and is driving this process,” Anosike said.

He also denied reports linking his candidacy to former Abia State Governor Okezie Ikpeazu.

Anosike cautioned the Otti-led administration against what he described as the intimidation of opposition voices, urging the governor to be open to criticism and public scrutiny.

“If you have nothing to hide, there is no reason to clamp down on people expressing their opinions. If you believe you have performed well, present your achievements and defend them.

“During debates, we will ask critical questions and expect answers. Arresting people for speaking their minds only raises suspicions,” he said.

The PDP candidate further accused Governor Otti of focusing mainly on road construction while neglecting other critical sectors of the economy.

According to Anosike, infrastructure development alone is insufficient to improve citizens’ welfare, arguing that the state government has failed to address growing poverty and economic hardship.

He also claimed that the Otti administration has benefited from increased federal allocations under President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

“Previous administrations received as little as N3 billion monthly, whereas the current government receives as much as N30 billion.

“With such resources, road construction alone should not be celebrated as an extraordinary achievement,” he said.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Politics

Probe Anyanwu, Mohammed over false information to INEC – Factional PDP petitions IGP

Published

on

By


Ogbeide Associates, Solicitors and Counsel, holding brief for the factional Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police, Tunji Disu, requesting an investigation into the party’s Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, and factional National Chairman, Hon. Abdulrahman Mohammed, over a letter dated November 3, 2025, addressed to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.

The petition alleges that the letter falsely claimed the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) had suspended Ambassador Umar Iliya Damagum as Acting National Chairman and appointed Mohammed in his place.

According to the petition, the NWC’s 608th Emergency Meeting of November 1, 2025, held barely 48 hours before the letter was written, resolved to suspend Anyanwu himself, along with three other officers, over allegations of anti-party activities.

The petition stated that no NWC resolution, minutes, or attendance record has been produced showing that the committee ever resolved to suspend Ambassador Damagum or appoint Mohammed.

The petition further noted that the official attendance record of the 608th meeting shows that Anyanwu was absent, while Mohammed was present at the meeting.

It noted that Mohammed had direct, firsthand knowledge of the meeting’s actual outcome before the disputed letter was sent.

The petition also draws attention to a subsisting Federal High Court judgment of October 10, 2024 (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/579/2024), which recognised Ambassador Damagum as Acting National Chairman and restrained INEC from acting on any document not bearing his signature—a judgment Senator Anyanwu himself had forwarded to INEC for compliance in November 2024.

The petition notes that the Court of Appeal, on March 9, 2026, affirmed the NWC’s suspension of Senator Anyanwu.

In addition to seeking an investigation of the two named individuals, the petition asks the Inspector-General to examine how INEC handled the November 3 letter, given that the commission was already in possession of both the subsisting court judgment and the NWC’s suspension resolution at the time.

“This petition is not about personalities. It is about whether public institutions can be misled with documents that do not reflect the true position of internal party processes, and whether such conduct will be investigated as the law requires,” counsel for the petitioner said.

The lawyers called on the Nigeria Police Force to treat the matter with urgency, while indicating that the petitioner stands ready to provide all supporting documentation, including the relevant court judgments and internal party records, to assist in the investigation.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Politics

Alleged fraud: Peter Obi officially serves Kenneth Okonkwo

Published

on

By


Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC, Mr Peter Obi, has officially served a writ of summons on actor-turned-politician Kenneth Okonkwo in a defamation suit filed at the High Court of Anambra State, Onitsha Judicial Division.

According to court documents dated June 25, 2026, Obi is seeking N8 billion in damages over statements allegedly made by Okonkwo during an appearance on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily programme on June 8, 2026, and subsequently circulated on social media platforms.

The legal action is being pursued on Obi’s behalf by Chief Alex Ejesieme (SAN) of Alex Ejesieme, SAN & Co. (Madiba Chambers), Awka, Anambra State.

DAILY POST reports that case stems from a growing dispute between the two former political allies, who have recently exchanged criticisms over political developments and leadership issues within the opposition movement.

The writ, issued by the court and marked for service outside Anambra State in neighbouring Enugu State, directs Okonkwo to enter an appearance within 42 days of being served or risk judgment being entered against him in his absence.

In the suit, Obi contends that comments made by Okonkwo during the television interview, which was later uploaded to Channels Television’s YouTube platform and amplified through his verified social media accounts, were false, malicious and defamatory.

The former Anambra State governor is claiming N5 billion as general damages for alleged injury to his reputation, character, integrity, public image, political standing and goodwill.

He is also seeking N2 billion as aggravated damages, citing what he described as the breadth, persistence and repetition of the alleged defamatory statements, including publications made after his lawyers issued a demand letter dated June 9, 2026.

In addition, Obi is asking the court to award N1 billion in exemplary damages, arguing that the defendant deliberately repeated and amplified the allegations despite being notified of his complaint.

Beyond monetary compensation, the plaintiff is seeking several court orders, including a directive compelling Okonkwo to publish a full retraction and apology on Channels Television, its YouTube platform, his social media accounts and in three national newspapers.

Obi is also requesting an order directing the defendant to remove all publications containing the disputed allegations from platforms under his control and a perpetual injunction restraining him from making similar allegations in the future.

The suit further seeks post-judgment interest on any monetary award granted by the court, as well as the costs of the action.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Trending