US President Donald Trump was asked to give his thoughts on Italy potentially replacing Iran at the 2026 World Cup finals while taking questions from the media at the Oval Office.
“I can confirm that I have suggested to Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino that Italy take Iran’s place at the World Cup,” US special envoy Zampolli told the Financial Times.
“As an Italian native, it would be a dream to see the Azzurri competing in a tournament hosted by the United States. With four titles, they have the history and stature to warrant inclusion.”
However, it was then confirmed that FIFA have no plans to replace Iran with Italy at this summer’s showpiece tournament. Iran’s participation at the upcoming World Cup remains uncertain due to their ongoing conflict with the United States.
While a temporary ceasefire remains in place, the two nations remain firmly at loggerheads over the Strait of Hormuz. A blockade has caused global oil prices to skyrocket – a situation that’s putting pressure on Trump and Iran’s leaders to find a solution.
Trump Asked if Italy Will Replace Iran at 2026 World Cup
Donald Trump
Italy are the highest-ranked FIFA team who failed to qualify for this summer’s World Cup. A shock playoff defeat to Bosnia and Herzegovina last month means the four-time world champions will miss their third World Cup in a row after also failing to qualify for Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022.
Trump was asked by a reporter at the White House on Thursday: “What do you think of this idea with replacing Iran with Italy in the World Cup?”
The US President made the assembled journalists laugh by saying: “I don’t think about it too much.” He added:
“That’s an interesting question. You know what, let me give that a little thought. Is that what they’re doing? They’re thinking about replacing them?”
Trump then asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio to answer the question. Rubio said: “Nothing from the US has told them they can’t come. The problem with Iran would not be with their athletes, it would be some of the other people they would want to bring with them, some of whom have ties to the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps). We may not be able to let them in, but not the athletes themselves.
“I don’t know where that’s coming from, other than speculation that Iran may decide not to come and that Italy would fill their spot. But if they decide not to come on their own, that’s because they decide not to come.
“What they can’t bring is a bunch of IRGC terrorists into our country and pretend they’re journalists and athletic trainers.”
Iran are set to begin their 2026 World Cup campaign against New Zealand on June 15. They will also face Belgium on June 21 and Egypt on 26. All three of their Group G matches are set to be played in the United States.
Manchester United are facing a battle in their hopes of landing Newcastle United star Lewis Hall, as a Premier League rival has joined the race, according to TeamTalk.
The England international has emerged as a key target for the Red Devils this summer, as they switch focus to improving the left-back ranks over the course of the transfer market.
It has been a problem position for several seasons, with Luke Shaw‘s fitness concerns joined by the inability to land a competitive replacement in recent transfer windows.
While the 30-year-old improved his availability last season, a return to the Champions League for next season means that several targets are on the radar to help deal with the increasingly busy schedule.
Hall appears to be target number one, but there is a fresh challenge in trying to secure his signature.
While there is some hope of getting a deal done, TeamTalk now reports that Premier League rivals Chelsea are in the conversation to sign the 21-year-old in the transfer window.
It’s claimed that the Blues are eyeing a possible return for the star, who came through the club’s academy ranks as a youngster before making the switch to Newcastle.
Chelsea have made enquiries over the possibility, which may only ramp up due to Marc Cucurella’s transfer to Real Madrid going through after a swift agreement was reached for the Spaniard.
The £60 million fee could prove to be prohibitive, with it being double the £30 million fee they managed to sell Hall for just a few years ago.
That said, the sale of Cucurella does mean the West London club now have money to burn at left-back, which could rock Man United in their own hopes of landing Hall.
The report claims that the 21-year-old is the “leading target” for the Red Devils this summer, but now face a battle on their hands to land him.
You scored
out of 20
Hall Deal Importance
via Reuters
Manchester United’s chase for a left-back will be key heading into next season, as the squad can’t be left short for such an important area with the return of the Champions League.
Enzo Fernandez opens up on Lionel Messi, Argentina’s World Cup triumph, and the pressure of defending the trophy on the biggest stage.
In this exclusive interview with Ben Jacobs, Enzo Fernandez reflects on winning the World Cup with Messi, his emotional first goal for Argentina, Dibu Martinez’s iconic final save, and what it means to represent Argentina heading into another massive tournament. Enzo also discusses his evolution as a player, growing into a leadership role, and his dream of one day captaining the national team.
From Messi’s influence to Argentina’s winning mentality, this is Enzo Fernandez on the moments that shaped his career — and what comes next.
According to reports, FIFA have managed to ban fans from one nation from bringing their own flags to World Cup games this summer. The ruling was upheld after a last-minute hearing in Los Angeles on Monday.
The team in question are Iran. Their supporters will no longer be able to wave pre-revolutionary flags at their matches in the United States this summer. They have games to come against New Zealand, Belgium and Egypt, which all take place in the US.
There is a current conflict between the two nations, and it was unclear if Iran would be able to compete at the tournament. They were supposed to have their training camp in Tucson, Arizona, but that was moved to Tijuana, Mexico. There have also been claims that they will only be allowed into the US to play their matches, before then immediately flying out of the country.
The flag is similar to the country’s official flag but features a lion and sun motif in the standard’s centre.
It was the subject of a lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Thursday by the Institute for Voice of Liberty and Sam Kermanian, an Iran fan intending to go to the game. Just hours before their match against the All Whites, it was ruled that the ban should be allowed to stand.
Judge Curtis A. Kin said:
“Free speech is incredibly important, it is sacred, a bedrock of our society, but it is not without limitation, such as private actor, on private property, and as shown by previous cases, regulating in reasonable way. I deny the application.”
The flag in question is historically associated with the country’s previous Shah-led regime, which was deposed in 1979. Judge Kin explained his reasoning, adding: “There may be harm to some 2,500 staff members who have to deal with safety protocols.
“It is a tremendous burden to change a long-standing stadium protocol for a massive event in a period of hours. It is hard to see how FIFA could make a change at one stadium and not the rest.” He argued a stadium, where a ticket for entry is required, is not pubic like a park or a street.
FIFA Deem Pre-Revolutionary Iran Flags As ‘Political’ in Nature
Lawyer Shahrokh Mokhtarzadeh, representing Iran fan Kermanian, argued that the World Cup is a joint venture between FIFA and governments and therefore the stadium is taking on a public forum. Speaking on behalf of 5,000 members of the Institute for Voice of Liberty:
“They are ticket holders, with a right to attend game with their own flag. This is being violated. It may be trivial to many, to them it is critical. There is a huge Iranian community in California, many are not going to want to walk in with Islamic Republic flag. They are being denied their exercise of free speech. This is not someone yelling fire in a theatre.”
Judge Kin responded: “So you could walk in with a Nazi flag or Confederate flag or Soviet flag or that of the KKK?” To which Mokhtarzadeh claimed that those people should also be protected by the right to free speech. He added: “Denial will cause more problems than are lost. (Allowing the lion and sun flag) is a way of preventing problems in the stadium. Right to free speech far outweighs any concern FIFA may have.”
FIFA appear to have taken issue with the pre-revolutionary flag, as it has been deemed “political” in nature. A source inside FIFA with direct knowledge of its position told The Athletic that this is the case.
On that, a past statement explained what ‘materials’ would not be allowed in World Cup stadiums: “Any materials, including but not limited to banners, flags, fliers, apparel and other paraphernalia, that are of a political, offensive and/or discriminatory nature, containing wording, symbols or any other attributes aimed at discrimination of any kind against a country, private person or group on account of race, skin colour, ethnicity, national or social origin, gender identity and expression, disability, language, religion, political opinion or any other opinion, birth, wealth or any other status, sexual orientation or on any other grounds.”
