Connect with us

Sports

FIFA Speak Out on Argentina 3-2 Egypt Decisions After ‘Rigged’ Claims

Published

on


Pierluigi Collina, FIFA’s Chief Refereeing Officer, has spoken out about the controversial decisions made during Argentina’s 3-2 win over Egypt amid claims the 2026 World Cup last 16 clash was ‘rigged’.

Egypt’s players and coaching staff were incensed after several decisions went against them at the Atlanta Stadium.

The Pharaohs led 2-0 on 67 minutes after Yasser Ibrahim and Mostafa Ziko found the net, but Argentina completed the comeback of the tournament so far thanks to goals in the 79th, 83rd and 92nd minutes from Cristian Romero, Lionel Messi and Enzo Fernandez, respectively.

Egypt had a goal controversially disallowed in the 58th minute for a foul on Argentina defender Lisandro Martinez at the opposite end of the pitch, while the African nation were convinced a penalty should have been awarded moments before Fernandez scored the winner when Mohamed Salah went down inside the box following a challenge by Julian Alvarez.

A series of serious accusations followed, with Ziko claiming the tournament was “rigged” in favour of reigning champions Argentina. Egypt head coach Hossam Hassan added: “They want Argentina and Messi to stay in the World Cup for marketing.”

FIFA’s Pierluigi Collina Issues Statement

FIFA's Pierluigi Collina

Collina, one of the most respected referees in football history, has now jumped to the defence of French official Francois Letexier following the accusations over his integrity.

“Let’s start by saying that we have now played 50% more matches than at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022, and there are still eight more huge games to be played,” the Italian told FIFA’s official website.

“Overall, we are happy. However, with such a high number of matches played in a relatively short period of time, it is normal that some things do not go as expected. When that happens, they are ready to work even harder to ensure they are fully prepared for the next match.

“Of course, constructive discussion about decisions will always be part of football, but unfounded allegations have no place in our sport. Nobody can question the integrity of the FIFA World Cup match officials. When this happens, it may provoke reactions that lead to threats against them and their families. This is not right.

“Equally, nobody can claim that FIFA Refereeing can be influenced by anyone, not even by the FIFA President [Gianni Infantino]. He has always shown his full support for FIFA Team One while trusting us to work with complete independence. Match officials make honest decisions and, just like players and coaches, they always try to do their best.”

You scored

out of 20

Collina Explains Controversial Argentina vs Egypt Decisions

Egypt coach Hossam Hassan is shown a yellow card by referee Francois Letexier REUTERS/Paul Childs

Collina then went into detail about the decisions that sparked most debate during Argentina’s win over Egypt.

He continued: “Usually, during a competition, we prefer not to focus on specific incidents. However, as we recently clarified what match officials would be looking for when attacking players try to prevent the opposing goalkeeper from moving and being able to defend the goal, we also wanted to clarify another topic that has generated debate.

“After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review. There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.

“An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt No. 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina No. 6 Lisandro Martínez.

Egypt foul on Lisandro Martinez FIFA

“We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears ‘obvious’, if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.

“Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent’s foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul. Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game.

“The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt No. 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina No. 10 Julian Alvarez.”

FIFA’s website provided a fresh angle of Alvarez’s tackle on Salah, showing the Argentina forward won the ball. Rather than appeal for a penalty, Salah got up and ran back as Lionel Scaloni’s side launched their match-winning counter-attack.

Alvarez tackles Salah FIFA

“Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions,” Collina concluded, “but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament.”

Argentina will now face Switzerland in the quarter-finals before a potential return to the Atlanta Stadium on July 15 to face either Norway or England.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Reason Why Footballers Cut Holes in Their Boots

Published

on

By


Footballers cutting holes in their socks has become an increasingly common trend in recent years, but now some players are even making holes in their boots.

A host of high-profile footballers have played games with holes in their socks including Real Madrid and England star Jude Bellingham, Arsenal’s Bukayo Saka and Brazilian icon Neymar.

One man who isn’t a fan of the trend is revered manager Jose Mourinho, now back at Real Madrid. Several years ago, the Portuguese tactician posted a series of photos of socks with holes alongside the caption: “Beautiful socks for the Beautiful Game… Approved by the football authorities.”

However, it turned out there was a good reason why footballers were cutting their socks up with scissors.

Players found that cutting holes reduced the pressure on their calf muscles, improving blood flow and circulation, as well as breathability.

A senior member of medical staff at a Premier League club revealed: “Many players feel the current socks are too tight and compressive on their legs, and some of them relate this to getting cramp in their calves.”

Now we’re seeing footballers beginning to cut holes in their boots – and the reason why has now emerged.

For example, Portugal’s Pedro Neto was seen with holes in his pink Nike Mercurial boots during the 2026 World Cup clash against Spain. Eagle-eyed fans spotted the Chelsea star’s boots had a hole in the back, exposing the socks, sparking much confusion on social media.

Neto swapped his boot after the first pair tore at the pre-cut hole, which made it too unusable to continue wearing, so he switched to a second pair with another deliberately cut, more controlled hole, per Footy Headlines.

Other footballers who have cut similar holes in their boots in the past include former Liverpool duo Roberto Firmino and Philippe Coutinho. Italian icon Daniele De Rossi did the same thing, way back in 2019 while playing for Argentine giants Boca Juniors.

Explained: Why Players Cut Holes in Boots

Portugal's Pedro Neto in action with Spain's Marc Cucurella Reuters/Maria Lysaker

According to various sources, including The Athletic, the most likely explanation is due to a condition that certain players suffer called Haglund’s deformity – an issue that affects the heel and can make tight footwear difficult to tolerate.

Haglund’s deformity is described as a “bony enlargement on the heel, close to where the Achilles tendon attaches.”

Michael Robson, a specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapist at LDN Physio, has revealed that some people have the extra bony prominence without experiencing any symptoms.

“It really only becomes a painful syndrome when that enlarged bone repeatedly irritates the soft tissue around it,” Robson told The Athletic.

You scored

out of 20

Bartholomew Hudson-Gill, a physiotherapist at Opus Biological who has worked with top-level footballers at a FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, describes Haglund’s deformity as a combination of the shape of the heel bone, thickening of the Achilles tendon and irritation of the bursa.

“That bursa, essentially, is like a shock absorber,” Hudson-Gill said. “The tendon becomes thicker, the bursa gets irritated, then the bone starts to get irritated.

“They load it more, it gets more sore. That soreness means there are changes in the bone, which means it then gets more sore.”

Another reason players may opt to cut a hole in their expensive footballer boots is due to a blister or another form of irritation.

In any case, it’s safe to say this isn’t a new fashion trend that footballers have suddenly decide to adopt.

Footballers struggling with various foot issues, including Haglund’s deformity, are cutting their boots as a last resort to ensure they can play matches pain-free.

Continue Reading

Sports

Eddie Hearn Reveals Why Tyson Fury vs Anthony Joshua is Set For Late-Night Start

Published

on

By


Eddie Hearn has revealed there is a “very good chance” Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury‘s long-awaited heavyweight showdown will take place at Wembley Stadium, while explaining why a controversial middle-of-the-night start time is now under serious consideration.

Speaking exclusively to GiveMeSport’s Sam Cohen, the Matchroom chairman addressed the biggest talking point in British boxing after reports emerged that Turki Alalshikh is exploring a late-night start.

While many fans have questioned whether such a late ring walk would be fair on supporters attending the event, Hearn says the reality is far more complicated.

Matchroom Has Rejected Moving Fury vs Joshua to America

Eddie Hearn and Anthony Joshua

The fight has been contracted to take place in the United Kingdom, despite interest in staging it in the United States. Hearn revealed Matchroom rejected the idea of moving the contest across the Atlantic, insisting Joshua wanted the biggest fight of his career on home soil.

“They came to us and said: “Look, we’d like to look at doing the fight in America.’ We said no. We insisted the fight was in the UK. AJ wants to fight in the UK. We’ve signed for the fight in the UK. So if you want the fight in America, we’ve got to renegotiate the contract.”

Instead, discussions have turned towards finding a compromise that allows Wembley to remain the venue while delivering a more favourable broadcast slot for American viewers.

“They’re trying to find a solution. That solution might be keeping the fight in the UK but running it at a slightly later time.”

A later start would require significant logistical support, including Transport for London operating through the early hours to allow more than 90,000 fans to travel home safely.

“It can only be possible with the support of probably Sadiq Khan and the Mayor of London, but also the infrastructure of Transport for London that would enable fans to leave the stadium. Otherwise you’re leaving at two or three in the morning and you can’t get home.”

Hearn Reveals Biggest Issue With Having Fury vs Joshua in UK Prime Time

Tyson Fury vs Anthony Joshua

“The truth is Netflix, who are the broadcaster of the fight, and Turki Alalshikh are paying a huge amount of money for this fight,” Hearn explained.

“So essentially, they want the biggest audience possible globally.”

“We’ve seen with Fury vs Makhmudov that a fight at 4pm eastern time in America [9pm UK] doesn’t do good numbers against college football and all the other plethora of sports that exist in America. It’s trying to find a way to make it close to prime time in the US and not too far out of prime time in the UK.”

Despite the challenges, Hearn believes there is genuine momentum behind the proposal because of the economic impact such an event would have on London.

“It’s also economically a big win for the city and for the UK to have that fight there. Those conversations exist now with Turki Alalshikh and those people. I think there’s a very good chance that you could see the fight at Wembley but with a slightly later kickoff.”

Hearn also questioned whether boxing supporters would really object if it guaranteed the undisputed blockbuster remained in Britain.

“Do we really care? We’re mad fans. Does it really matter if it’s after 11pm? Everyone’s going to go. You just go after the pub. Let’s try and find a way to put that fight in its rightful place, which is the UK.”

Anthony Joshua Final Hurdle Before Facing Tyson Fury

Anthony Joshua Anthony Joshua’s Instagram

Before Joshua can finally meet Fury, however, he must first negotiate a dangerous return to the ring against Prenga later this month.

Hearn stressed there is no room for complacency, admitting the Fury fight would immediately collapse if Joshua suffered an upset defeat.

“It’s very important because if he loses, the fight’s off. We’ve signed for the Tyson Fury fight as long as he beats Prenga, so it would be a disaster if he didn’t.”

Although Joshua will start as the overwhelming favourite, Hearn warned that heavyweight boxing remains the sport’s most unpredictable division.

“It’s not going to be easy. People are quick to forget what AJ went through six months ago, not just physically but with the grief he suffered after losing one of his friends. I couldn’t be a bigger admirer of AJ in terms of how he’s applied himself in this training camp. He’s worked harder than he’s ever trained. He’s going into the fight in great shape.”

Prenga arrives with an intimidating knockout record, something Hearn believes should prevent anybody overlooking the challenge.

“He’s fighting a guy with 21 wins and 20 knockouts. It’s not going to be easy. On paper AJ should go through this guy, but heavyweight boxing is always seat-of-your-pants stuff.”

Should Joshua come through successfully, attention will immediately turn towards a face-to-face meeting with Fury. Hearn even hinted that fans may not have to wait long for official confirmation.

“Get through this and hopefully we’ll see Mr Fury in Jeddah face-to-face with an official announcement that may even come with a date and venue as well.”

For boxing fans who have waited years to see Britain’s two biggest heavyweight stars share a ring, the biggest obstacle may no longer be making the fight, it might simply be deciding what time the opening bell rings.

Continue Reading

Sports

How Much Money Every 2026 World Cup Nation Has Made At This Summer’s Tournament

Published

on

By


The 2026 World Cup has been thrilling. There was optimism that this summer’s tournament could be one of the best ever, and it has not disappointed. There’s been incredible drama on the pitch, while there’s also been a lot of controversy off it.

The tournament has now reached the quarter-final stage and 40 teams have already been eliminated. Co-hosts Mexico, the United States and Canada all bowed out in the last 16, while the likes of Scotland, Germany, Brazil, Portugal and the Netherlands also suffered early exits.

Eight teams now remain, all with the aim of being crowned champions on July 19: France, Morocco, Spain, Belgium, England, Norway, Argentina and Switzerland.

Ahead of the quarter-finals, it has been revealed how much money every nation has earned in the competition so far.

Knocked Out in the Group Stage (48-33)Steve Clarke with Scotland players

Teams that failed to make it past the group stage were paid $9m (£6.7m) for the three matches they played.

Among the teams that bowed out at this stage of the competition were Scotland. Scotland, who were competing in their first World Cup since 1998, were looking to progress from the group stage for the first time in their history.

Their campaign got off to a good start as they beat Haiti. But a narrow defeat to Morocco and then a 3-0 drubbing at the hands of Brazil condemned them to an early exit. Steve Clarke lost his job as a result.

Turkey and Uruguay were expected to qualify to the knockout rounds, but both had miserable tournaments. Also failing to progress from the group stage was Iran, who suffered an early exit despite going unbeaten in their three matches.

Prize money for nations knocked out in the group stage (48-33)

Nation

Group

Total in $

Total in £

South Korea

A

$9m

£6.7m

Czechia

A

$9m

£6.7m

Qatar

B

$9m

£6.7m

Scotland

C

$9m

£6.7m

Haiti

C

$9m

£6.7m

Turkey

D

$9m

£6.7m

Curacao

E

$9m

£6.7m

Tunisia

F

$9m

£6.7m

Iran

G

$9m

£6.7m

New Zealand

G

$9m

£6.7m

Uruguay

H

$9m

£6.7m

Saudi Arabia

H

$9m

£6.7m

Iraq

I

$9m

£6.7m

Jordan

J

$9m

£6.7m

Uzbekistan

K

$9m

£6.7m

Panama

L

$9m

£6.7m

Knocked Out in the Last 32 (32-17)

Virgil van Dijk (Netherlands) after World Cup exit Eloisa Sanchez via Action Images via Reuters

The 16 teams that successfully made it out of the group stage, but were then knocked out in the last 32, earned $11m (£8.2m).

The two most high profile teams to exit at this stage were the Netherlands and Germany. The Netherlands were impressive in their three group stage matches as they hit the back of the net 10 times. However, their reward for finishing top of Group F was a very tricky tie against Morocco, which they lost on penalties.

Big things were also expected of Germany going into the tournament, and they got their campaign off to a terrific start when they thrashed Curacao 7-1. They failed to build on that result, though, as they suffered a penalty shootout defeat to Paraguay.

Among the other teams to bow out at this stage of the competition were Senegal, 2022 World Cup semi-finalists Croatia, and Japan.

Prize money for nations knocked out in the last 32 (32-17)

Nation

Total in $

Total in £

South Africa

$11m

£8.2m

Netherlands

$11m

£8.2m

Germany

$11m

£8.2m

Sweden

$11m

£8.2m

Senegal

$11m

£8.2m

Bosnia and Herzevogina

$11m

£8.2m

Austria

$11m

£8.2m

Croatia

$11m

£8.2m

Japan

$11m

£8.2m

Ivory Coast

$11m

£8.2m

Ecuador

$11m

£8.2m

DR Congo

$11m

£8.2m

Algeria

$11m

£8.2m

Ghana

$11m

£8.2m

Australia

$11m

£8.2m

Cape Verde

$11m

£8.2m

Knocked Out in the Last 16 (16-9)

Christian Pulisic Reuters/Gary Vasquez

The eight teams that won their first knockout round, but then lost in the last 16, earned $11m (£8.2m). That includes the three co-hosts: Mexico, the United States and Canada.

Mexico were mightily impressive in their run to the last 16, but they were eliminated at that stage after a thoroughly entertaining 3-2 defeat to one of the tournament favourites, England.

The United States were thumped 4-1 by Belgium at the same stage of the competition, while Canada bowed out of the tournament a few days prior when they were beaten by Morocco.

Portugal and Brazil’s defeats to Spain and Norway respectively means they also earned $15m, as did Colombia, Egypt and Paraguay.

Prize money for nations knocked out in the last 16 (16-9)

Nation

Total in $

Total in £

Canada

$15m

£11.2m

Paraguay

$15m

£11.2m

USA

$15m

£11.2m

Portugal

$15m

£11.2m

Brazil

$15m

£11.2m

Mexico

$15m

£11.2m

Colombia

$15m

£11.2m

Egypt

$15m

£11.2m

Competing in the Quarter-finals (8-1)

England's Harry Kane during the World Cup win vs Mexico REUTERS/Eloisa Sanchez

The eight teams that have made it to the quarter-finals have all guaranteed themselves $19m (£14.1m) in prize money. However, that figure could rise exponentially should they continue to progress in the competition.

The team that loses in the third-placed match will earn $27m (£20.1m), while the side that wins that match will be paid $29m (£21.6m).

The nation that makes it all the way to the final, but then falls at the final hurdle, will have earned $33m (£24.6m) in prize money, while the victor will be paid a whopping $50m (£37.2m).

France, who are currently the tournament favourites, play Morocco in the last eight. Reigning champions face Switzerland, while England take on Norway and Spain face Belgium.

Prize money for nations still in the competition (8-1)

Nation

Total in $

Total in £

France

$19m

£14.1m

Morocco

$19m

£14.1m

Spain

$19m

£14.1m

Belgium

$19m

£14.1m

England

$19m

£14.1m

Norway

$19m

£14.1m

Argentina

$19m

£14.1m

Switzerland

$19m

£14.1m

Continue Reading

Trending