Liverpool’s Paddy Pimblett lost for the first time in his UFC career on Saturday night after dropping a unanimous decision to Justin Gaethje in the main event of UFC 324. In the aftermath of the interim lightweight championship bout, Pimblett was full of praise for his opponent, admitting that the better man won on the night.
Having been undefeated in his first seven UFC fights, Paddy went down 48-47, 49-46 and 49-46 on the judges’ scorecards. After claiming the interim title, Gaethje now moves on to face full lightweight champion, Ilia Topuria, in a unification fight later this year.
One UFC analyst, though, has highlighted a key moment missed by referee Marc Goddard that “completely changed the fight” at UFC 324.
Pimblett entered the Octagon at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas as a strong favourite to defeat American veteran Gaethje and experience his first taste of UFC gold. However, Paddy The Baddy quickly realised he was in a tough fight after being dropped by an uppercut in the first round.
Once the action returned to the feet, referee Goddard was forced to step in after Gaethje caught Pimblett with a finger in the eye. The action was stopped to allow Pimblett time to recover. Once he’d done so, the official was quick to let ‘The Highlight’ know that any further pokes would result in a point deduction.
The Moment That ‘Changed the Outcome’ of UFC 324 Main Event
Despite that stern warning, Gaethje again poked Pimblett in the eye in the second round, this time with his thumb. On the second occasion, though, Goddard missed the foul. Even more importantly, it led to Paddy being sent to the canvas and sustaining some of the worst damage he would absorb in the fight.
For TNT Sports’ UFC analyst, Nick Peet, the missed second eye poke “changed the fight” considerably. Speaking on the Fight Disciples podcast, Peet explained why the poke was so damaging to Pimblett’s chances.
“If the referee sees this [the second poke], Paddy has now not taken all the damage. He’s not cut to ribbons. He’s had time to recover. Gaethje’s now had a point taken off. The next time he does it, he’s going to get disqualified. Plus, it’s a brave referee [judge] who gives a round to a fighter who’s had a point taken off. Worst case it’s a 9-9 [round], but most judges are going to go 10-8 [to Pimblett] and then Paddy wins round three.
“In football, if they miss a penalty [incident] on VAR, the whole conversation is ‘that f***** penalty would have changed the game’. That thumb in the eye could have changed the fight.”
He concluded: “From the thumb in the eye to the end of round two is when Paddy takes the most damage.”
Ultimately, Pimblett lost the final two rounds of the bout on two of the judges’ scorecards. However, if as Peet points out, he had not been so badly damaged in the second round, the fight could well have ended differently, especially if he had been awarded a 10-8 round in the second session.
Does the UFC Have Its Own Version of VAR?
For all UFC events in Nevada, where UFC 324 was held, officials do have the option to view an instant replay of any incident that they choose. The wording of the rules on the above read as follows:
“The referee may, at any time during a contest or exhibition, call a time-out to consult with officials of the Commission or to view replay footage.”
According to commentator Daniel Cormier on the UFC 324 broadcast, Goddard did take a look at a replay at the end of the second round. However, it has not been confirmed that he replayed the moment that Gaethje’s thumb made contact with Pimblett’s eye. For as much as Paddy was magnanimous in defeat on Saturday night, when he watches the fight back, he could be excused for wondering what might have been.