Connect with us

Politics

2027: Obasanjo secretly working to advance Tinubu’s second term – Yoruba Ronu alleges

Published

on


Fresh controversy has emerged over former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s political stance ahead of the 2027 general election.

There are also conflicting claims over whether he is backing President Bola Tinubu’s re-election bid or supporting the opposition alliance led by Peter Obi and Rabiu Kwankwaso.

The Yoruba Ronu Leadership Forum, YRLF, on Sunday accused Obasanjo of secretly working to advance Tinubu’s second term ambition while publicly presenting himself as a supporter of opposition efforts.

In a statement signed by its president, Akin Malaolu, the group alleged that Obasanjo’s recent interventions on national politics were aimed at weakening opposition forces. 

It cited the former president’s recent letter to ex-Ogun State Governor Segun Osoba, in which Obasanjo alleged that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar supported an impeachment plot against him during his tenure in office.

According to the forum, the allegations against Atiku amounted to an indirect attack on opposition parties and could undermine ongoing coalition building efforts ahead of the 2027 election.

The group also criticised Obasanjo for mentioning the late former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Ghali Umar Na’Abba, in the controversy, noting that he was no longer alive to respond to the claims.

YRLF further alleged that Obasanjo’s public support for the emerging Obi-Kwankwaso alliance was being used to conceal an underlying preference for Tinubu’s re-election.

It claimed that the former president played a key role in discussions that led to the formation of the opposition coalition and strongly backed Obi’s emergence as its presidential candidate.

However, Obasanjo’s former Political Adviser, Dr Akin Osuntokun, dismissed the allegations as unfounded.

Speaking on ARISE Television, Osuntokun insisted that Obasanjo was, in fact, one of the principal architects of the Obi-Kwankwaso alliance under the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC.

“If you can say that Obasanjo is supporting any ticket, it is the Peter Obi–Kwankwaso ticket,” Osuntokun said, describing claims of secret support for Tinubu as “absolute bunkum.”

He maintained that Obasanjo personally facilitated discussions between Obi and Kwankwaso and played a central role in bringing the alliance together.

According to Osuntokun, the former president leveraged his close relationship with both politicians to broker the partnership, which he believes has the potential to significantly influence the outcome of the 2027 presidential election.

He also revealed that talks about a possible Obi-Kwankwaso alliance had been ongoing for years, suggesting that a similar arrangement could have materialised before the 2023 election.

The debate comes amid heightened political realignments ahead of 2027 and follows renewed tensions between Obasanjo and Atiku over allegations surrounding attempts to remove the former president from office during his administration.

Atiku has denied the allegations, maintaining that his opposition to Obasanjo’s failed third term agenda remains one of the defining moments of Nigeria’s democratic history.




dailypost.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

APC threatens erring stakeholders in Anambra with sanctions, affirms Ukachukwu as state leader

Published

on

By


The National leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on Tuesday read a riot act to the warring factions of the party in Anambra State.

The party represented by the APC fact finding committee for Anambra State, led by the Deputy national chairman (South) of the party, Dr. Ben Nwoye during a meeting with stakeholders threatened to deal with troublemakers who have continually caused division in the party.

The APC in Anambra State has been in disarray with several courts suits since after its primary election in March, with aggrieved members staging protests, while a court order had allegedly removed the Senator Emma Anosike-led state exco.

Dr Ben Nwoye who led members of the fact finding committee to the state to ascertain the problem in the party said it had through meetings in Abuja with the leadership of the warring factions found out some of the reasons for the division in the party.

Nwoye stated that the state leadership of the party is not on contest, and that the duo of Prince Nicholas Ukachukwu and Senator Uche Ekwunife are the leader and deputy leader, and that those positions must be respected.

The chairman said: “I’m not here to massage your ego, but I on read a riot act to you and you must abide by it. The problem you have in your state was not caused by anyone of us in the committee, but we are here to see how you can settle because we are one family.

“As this proceedings continue, I don’t want to know which faction of the party you belong to, if you constitute yourself into a thug, we will treat you as such. You must respect yourself through out the period of this reconciliation,” he said.

Nwoye stated that the two options before the committee were to dissolve the executive of the two factions of the party or to align with state leadership of Emma Anosike as the recognized one.

He said: “We will not like anyone to disrespect the leaders of our party no matter your faction. It is settled that the one with the ticket of the party for governorship and who receives our flag becomes the leader of the party in the state. Prince Nicholas Ukachukwu and Senator Uche Ekwunife were our candidates in the last election and they are the leader and deputy leader. The party knows that.

“I appeal to all leaders to open the doors of consultation, let the hurt speak, let mistakes be admitted and let authority unite rather than intimidate. Any peace that does not reach the grassroots is incomplete. If genuine members are abandoned, the party becomes vulnerable to rumours and manipulation.”

The reconciliation meeting featured speeches from aggrieved and prominent actors from both factions, with the committee taking note and pledging to get back to the national leaders of the party with the feedbacks gathered.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court judgment: Evidence was concocted in deregistration suit – ADC

Published

on

By


By Luminous Jannamike

The African Democratic Congress, ADC, on Tuesday hailed the Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision overturning the Federal High Court judgment ordering its deregistration, saying the appellate court found that trial judge, Justice Peter Lifu, had ‘concocted evidence’ in favour of the plaintiffs.

The ruling effectively ends, for now, the legal battle over the party’s existence, affirming that the ADC remains a duly recognised political party under the Constitution and the Electoral Act and freeing it to focus on its political activities instead of defending its survival in court.

The party made this known in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, who said the appellate court’s decision vindicated the ADC’s long-held position that the suit was legally flawed, unsupported by evidence and incapable of producing a valid judgment.

Abdullahi said: “The ADC also considers as extraordinary the finding by the Court of Appeal that Justice Peter Lifu concocted evidence in resolving the dispute in favour of the plaintiff.

“We believe this goes to the very heart of the integrity of the judiciary and the judicial process. We note that this is the second time in cases involving the ADC that Justice Peter Lifu would be coming under serious indictment by the superior court for wilful disobedience and judicial insubordination and impertinence. We therefore wonder whether such a roundly discredited judge should be allowed to sit on the bench even for a day longer.”

Beyond setting aside the lower court’s judgment in its entirety, the party said the appellate court held that the plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to bring the suit, having failed to establish any personal legal interest beyond speculative claims that they had contested elections in the past and might do so again in future.

“In striking out the case for want of jurisdiction, the Court of Appeal declared that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate any legal interest peculiar to themselves, relying instead on speculative assertions that they had previously contested elections and might do so again in future, which the court found insufficient to invoke its jurisdiction,” the statement said.

The court also found, according to the ADC, that the plaintiffs failed to prove their claims with credible evidence, while accepting unchallenged evidence from the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, that the party had met all constitutional and electoral requirements for its continued existence.

The ruling also addressed the status of the party’s elected representatives, with the ADC saying the appellate court rejected the trial court’s conclusion that its lawmakers had defected to another political party, holding that no evidence was presented to support such a finding despite affidavit evidence showing the party had elected representatives, including three members from Kogi State.

“The Court equally rejected the reasoning adopted by the trial court concerning elected members of the ADC. It would be recalled that despite affidavit evidence showing that the ADC had returned elected representatives, including three members from Kogi State, the trial court concluded that those members had defected to another political party, even though no evidence whatsoever of any such defection existed before the court,” Abdullahi stated.

The party recalled that the Attorney-General of the Federation, Chief Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, later became a party to the suit seeking the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties, arguing that they no longer satisfied the constitutional requirements for continued recognition under Section 225A of the Constitution.

It added that the appellate court faulted the trial court’s interpretation of the constitutional provision, noting that although the lower court acknowledged the correct legal position, it nevertheless reached conclusions that were inconsistent with both the Constitution and the evidence before it.

“The Court of Appeal therefore concluded that the African Democratic Congress satisfies the constitutional threshold for recognition as a political party and remains fully entitled to continue its political activities under the Constitution and the Electoral Act,” the ADC added.

Describing the ruling as significant beyond the fortunes of the affected political parties, Abdullahi said it reaffirmed the principle that judicial authority must be exercised within the bounds of the law, in obedience to superior court orders and on the basis of evidence properly placed before the court.

He added: “We consider this judgment significant, not merely because it restores the rights of the affected political parties but because it reinforces an enduring constitutional principle: that judicial authority must always be exercised within the bounds of the law, in obedience to superior court orders, and on the basis of evidence properly before it.

“The ADC has always maintained its confidence in the judicial process. We are gratified that the Court of Appeal has reaffirmed the rule of law, corrected a grave miscarriage of justice, and protected the constitutional rights of political parties against unlawful interference.”

Abdullahi said the party would continue to strengthen its structures, deepen democratic participation and offer Nigerians what it described as a credible political alternative.


www.vanguardngr.com

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Kaduna Gov, Uba Sani nominates Jerry Adams as running mate

Published

on

By


Kaduna State Governor, Uba Sani has nominated Jerry Adams, the Executive Chairman of the Kaduna State Internal Revenue Service (KADIRS), as his running mate for the 2027 governorship election.

Adams, who was appointed to lead KADIRS in 2023 hails from Southern Kaduna.

In his announcement, Sani said the decision followed consultations and was intended to reflect principles of inclusion, fairness and equitable representation.

He described Adams as an experienced public servant and tax administrator whose tenure at the revenue agency had supported the state’s fiscal capacity.

The current Deputy Governor, Hadiza Sabuwa Balarabe, is ineligible to seek a third consecutive term under constitutional term limits. 

Governor Sani stated that the choice aligns with his administration’s focus on merit, competence and broader representation across the state.




dailypost.ng

Continue Reading

Trending