Sports
10 Greatest Winning Teams in World Cup History Ranked By Shearer and Richards
Ahead of the 2026 World Cup starting this June, there is no better time to reflect on those who have lifted football’s most prestigious trophy in the past. Brazil stand alone as the most successful nation, with five triumphs at the summit of the beautiful game, while Germany, Italy and Argentina are not far behind, having all won it more recently.
Indeed, the likes of England and Spain have also enjoyed their moments of glory. Alan Shearer and Micah Richards – both part of unsuccessful Three Lions squads themselves – went head-to-head in a BBC Match of the Day segment back in November 2022, ranking the 10 greatest nations to have ever won it all.
The timing of that discussion means Lionel Messi’s most recent triumph does not feature in their list, but their selections still make for fascinating reading. In particular, their differing takes on England’s 1966 side, as well as their contrasting views on Spain’s iconic 2010 team, stand out.
13 Best Teams in World Cup History [Ranked]
England’s 1966 team feature, as does Italy’s 2006 squad and two different Brazil iterations.
Micah Richards’ 10 Greatest World Cup Winning Teams
The Beeb’s segment began with an early disagreement between Richards and Shearer, which appeared to set the tone for the entire programme. The first of several debates centred on whether France’s 2018 triumph was the weakest of the top nations put forward, or whether Argentina’s 1978 side deserved the 10th spot instead.
Richards placed France’s most recent win in 10th. They went unbeaten throughout the tournament and famously beat Argentina 4-3 in the last 16, in one of the World Cup’s greatest matches, but the former Manchester City defender justified his ranking by pointing to the presence of Steven Nzonzi, then a Stoke City player, in the squad – a factor he felt prevented it from ranking any higher.
The duo agreed on Italy 1982 coming in at eighth, with 40-year-old goalkeeper Dino Zoff becoming the oldest player to win the tournament, while Paolo Rossi took the Golden Boot as the Azzurri overcame both Brazil and Argentina on their way to the final.
However, ranking Spain’s tiki-taka side of 2010 in seventh would have raised eyebrows among Shearer and many viewers alike, as would Richards’ decision to place Brazil’s 2002 side just one place higher. Richards did, however, align with his colleague on West Germany’s 1990 team being placed fifth, despite what is often considered one of the least memorable finals in history, with them needing an Andreas Brehme penalty to edge past Argentina.
He ranked France’s first triumph in 1998 in third, above England’s sole World Cup win, though he was quick to pay tribute to the latter: “It is just the story of it and being at Wembley. It is the immortality of the whole thing and the players.” The pair were unanimous, however, in placing Brazil 1970 at the top, with “Maradona’s team” taking second place in Richard’s books.
|
Micah Richards’ Top 10 World Cup-winning Teams |
|
|---|---|
|
10th |
France (2018) |
|
9th |
Argentina (1978) |
|
8th |
Italy (1982) |
|
7th |
Spain (2010) |
|
6th |
Brazil (2002) |
|
5th |
West Germany (1990) |
|
4th |
England (1966) |
|
3rd |
France (1998) |
|
2nd |
Argentina (1986) |
|
1st |
Brazil (1970) |
20 Greatest Teams in Football History Ranked by Fans
These teams are among the most historic in the sport.
Alan Shearer’s 10 Greatest World Cup Winning Teams
After picking Argentina’s 1978 squad in 10th – a side that defeated Johan Cruyff’s Netherlands 3-1 after extra time in the final – Gary Lineker interjected Shearer’s decision, saying: “I loved this team, I remember Kempes winning the Golden Boot and cheering all the goals against Peru because I went with the host nation. It was a decent final, because that Dutch team were very strong.”
That didn’t stop him from placing them below France’s 2018 triumph, as Kylian Mbappé announced his talent to the globe, nor did it shift his stance on putting Italy’s greatest win in eighth. While Richards had Argentina’s 1986 side in second, Shearer explained his decision to rank them seventh, saying:
“I don’t think it’s fair to say he [Maradona] carried them though, they had some very good players. In that World Cup he was unbelievable, as good as any player had played in any World Cup in history. What a personality as well.”
France’s first World Cup triumph comes in at sixth, while West Germany are placed fifth. In fourth, he said of Brazil 2002: “Ronaldo, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho. Brilliant team, they also had Carlos and Cafu. That Ronaldinho goal against England was a fluke though.”
But despite Scolari’s side winning seven games en route to gold, he still felt Spain 2010 were better. Richards argued the side’s constant 1-0 wins were too dull to rank that highly, but Shearer placed them inside the medal positions, just below England’s 1966 triumph.
Then, on naming Brazil 1970 top, he explained: “One of the easiest decisions even though I never saw them. The way people eulogise about them and the names they had, it had to be them.”
|
Alan Shearer’s Top 10 World Cup-winning Teams |
|
|---|---|
|
10th |
Argentina (1978) |
|
9th |
France (2018) |
|
8th |
Italy (1982) |
|
7th |
Argentina (1986) |
|
6th |
France (1998) |
|
5th |
West Germany (1990) |
|
4th |
Brazil (2002) |
|
3rd |
Spain (2010) |
|
2nd |
England (1966) |
|
1st |
Brazil (1970) |
Sports
John Terry Names 3 Players England Should’ve Taken to the World Cup
John Terry has cast doubts over England’s chances at the 2026 World Cup after seeing Thomas Tuchel leave three players out of his 26-man squad.
The Three Lions will take on Croatia, Ghana and Panama in Group L before potentially facing a nightmare route to the final. There was a lot of talk about some of the high-profile absentees from Tuchel’s squad, with the German insisting on picking the best ‘team’, rather than a group of the most talented individuals.
Now Terry, a 78-cap England international, has expressed his ‘worries’ heading into the tournament, which starts in less than a week.
John Terry Baffled By 3 England Absences at the World Cup
Speaking on his TikTok channel ahead of the World Cup, the legendary Chelsea captain has questioned some of the decisions made by the German boss. He first claimed Manchester United’s Harry Maguire would ‘100% be in my England team’, saying:
“Some big calls and some big players left out. The first one, Harry Maguire, would 100% be in my England team. Whether he starts or not, I think he could be a big player from set plays.
“Someone who’s got loads of experience at the top level playing for Man Utd. He’s been excellent since Michael Carrick’s taken over and a big part of Man Utd’s success.”
Supercomputer Ranks Every 2026 World Cup Team’s Chances – England Above Argentina
Opta’s supercomputer claims England have a stronger chance that Lionel Messi’s Argentina.
The defender was an ever-present at the heart of Gareth Southgate’s backline at Euro 2020, while also being an impressive performer at the last two World Cups. He was unfortunate to miss out on Euro 2024 due to injury, but has now been left out by the new boss.
He’s not the only wrongly omitted player in Terry’s eyes. Both Cole Palmer and Phil Foden were also shock exclusions when Tuchel announced his squad list. The defender-turned-pundit believes the ‘best’ players should always be selected.
He said: “Cole Palmer. I think as an England side we miss players like this that can come on and change the game or have that little bit of magic. I know Cole and Foden haven’t been in the best of form this season, but I would always take my best players to the World Cup and those two are certainly there for me.
“We’re talking games that are going to be boiling hot. Moments and special players coming on the pitch for 20 minutes to change the game, there’s no better than those two in the Premier League. They would have definitely been on my list.”
Why John Terry is ‘Worried’ About England’s Chances
Looking at the 26 names over in the United States to represent his country, Terry only believes 13 or 14 can realistically start matches. “There’s probably 13 or 14 players that can start for England in the big, big games. I look at the players that are fringe players, and that worries me a little bit.”
⚽
England World Cup Quiz
You scored
out of 20
That’s what is concerning the ex-captain. He went on to explain that having a proven player with big game experience to take off the bench would’ve been extremely beneficial to Tuchel. He continued:
“I think as a top manager, you need your best players on the plane at these big tournaments. Players that have done it. Palmer’s done it in the big tournaments, he scored our last goal in the European final.
“Big moments are for big players and I think you take your best players always.”
Sports
FIFA Make U-Turn on World Cup Decision After Being Called Out by Keir Starmer
FIFA have made a number of controversial decisions in the lead-up to the 2026 World Cup, and their decision to ban football fans from bringing water bottles into stadiums has perhaps been the most controversial of them all.
The sport’s global governing body made the decision despite the extreme heat that is expected in North America over the next month-and-a-half.
Justifying their decision, FIFA said: “FIFA is committed to protecting the health and safety of all players, referees, fans, volunteers and staff. FIFA made the decision to prohibit bottles to prevent risk and injury to players and attendees.
“Outside bottles are already prohibited at several of these venues for safety considerations and FIFA is applying this consideration across its tournament stadiums.
“FIFA works closely with each host city committee and local authorities on heat mitigation factors for fans travelling to the stadium, which can include resources such as misting stations, fans, hydration stations, cooling tents and more around the stadium footprint.
“Inside the stadium footprint, pricing for water bottles for the FIFA World Cup 2026 will remain consistent with other events held at each stadium.”
Keir Starmer Slams FIFA
FIFA’s decision sparked widespread backlash, with Keir Starmer among the high-profile names that urged them to make a U-turn. The President of the United Kingdom said, per ESPN: “It’s just wrong. And I can’t help but think that it’s about making money.
“So you can’t bring plastic bottles in but you can buy a bottle of water when you get in the crowd? And then it’ll be expensive. The tickets themselves cost a fortune, far too expensive in my view. So the ticket sales are too high. And this is the wrong policy.
“I would call on FIFA to just look again at this. Think about it. Think of the fans. They are football fans from all sorts of backgrounds across our country, across the world. They’re already spending a fortune getting there. They’ve got to pay a lot for tickets, too much in my book.”
FIFA Make Partial U-Turn on Water Bottles
FIFA have now partially backtracked on the policy, with specific water bottles now being allowed inside stadiums inside the USA and Canada. A post from the governing body said, per the Independent: “All fans will be permitted to bring in one, soft, plastic, 20 ounces (590ml), factory sealed disposable water bottle into any Fifa World Cup 2026 match in the USA and Canada.”
2026 World Cup chief operating officer, Heimo Schirgi added: “What is not allowed are hard-sided resealable water containers, which could pose a safety and security risk.”
The new rule does not apply to venues located in Mexico, though.
You scored
out of 20
New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani has welcomed FIFA’s U-turn. He told the Athletic: “I’m glad that FIFA decided to reverse this policy and allow water bottles to be brought into World Cup games.
“No one should have to fear being priced out of being hydrated, especially fans who are often waiting for hours before a game in extreme heat.”
The World Cup will begin on June 11, with the winner of the competition being crowned on July 19.
Sports
Liverpool’s Response To Bayern Munich Over Rio Ngumoha Transfer
Liverpool have set a clear stance over the future of Rio Ngumoha, according to Fabrizio Romano, as Bayern Munich eye a transfer switch for the young winger.
The 17-year-old enjoyed a breakthrough campaign over the past season, following his switch from the Chelsea academy back in 2014.
Ngumoha made 19 Premier League appearances in his debut campaign, scoring two goals and assisting once, showing plenty of promise and bright sparks during an otherwise difficult season for Liverpool.
While the left-winger hasn’t become a regular starter just yet, there are signs that he could be the future there for the Reds, if he continues on his current trajectory.
However, that has also caught the attention of Bayern Munich.
Liverpool Set Rio Ngumoha Stance
Recent reports have stated that Bayern Munich have shown interest in a move for Ngumoha, outlining the young winger as a potential option in the summer transfer window.
The England youth international was viewed as a potential alternative to Anthony Gordon, after Bayern missed out on the forward to Barcelona in the market.
While Ngumoha is of interest, Liverpool have seemingly responded with defiance, making it clear that the 17-year-old is not available in the transfer window.
According to Fabrizio Romano, Liverpool have zero intention of negotiating a transfer fee or discussing the possibility of an exit for the winger in the transfer window, something that has been made clear to Bayern Munich.
The decision has been described as one made by the club, with Andoni Iraola yet to get into the details of transfer dealings for his new squad.
With a deal seen as “impossible”, Bayern Munich will need to look elsewhere, while Liverpool can continue planning their future with Ngumoha in mind.
That may also mean making a fresh decision over extending his stay, with a huge choice to be made in the coming months surrounding his deal.
You scored
out of 20
Liverpool Face Ngumoha Contract Decision
Ngumoha only signed his first professional deal back in September of last year, outlining just how quickly the youngster has risen through the ranks at Liverpool.
While it was a clear triumph to agree such a contract, the difficulty is that at 17, he could only agree a three-year deal at most, meaning he is only contracted until 2028.
So, with 18-months left on Ngumoha’s deal, Liverpool may be considering the possibility of extending it further in the coming months, despite only recently signing a contract.
At 18 years old, players can sign contracts above the three-year limit, which is set for academy stars, a milestone that the winger will reach in late August this year.
‘I Played 27 Liverpool Games For Jurgen Klopp – But Andoni Iraola Made Me Much Better’
Andoni Iraola got the best out of a player who struggled to even get on the pitch under Jurgen Klopp at Liverpool.
That may prompt Liverpool to discuss the possibility of offering an extension, to avoid entering the final year next summer that could then result in an awkward transfer standoff.
It remains to be seen just how keen the club’s hierarchy would be to push for such a move, considering how recently a contract was signed, while the player may also consider his options with no rush to extend.
It sets up a long-term decision, but for now, Ngumoha is heading into next season as an important player for the future.
-
Sports1 day agoIbrahima Konate to Earn Crazy Amount at Real Madrid as Liverpool Wage Compared
-
Sports23 hours agoNewcastle Agree £25m Deal to Sign Ewen Jaouen
-
Politics19 hours agoAnger as Anambra govt arraigns Abia NDC Senatorial aspirant for alleged fake miracles
-
Sports2 days agoMichael Carrick Wants Man Utd to Sign 5 Players
-
Sports12 hours agoSheikh Jassim’s Stance on New Man Utd Takeover Bid
-
Entertainment2 days agoOnly Akin Faminu Could Make Lime Green and Mustard Look This Good
-
Metro2 days agoSeveral killed as fresh militia attacks hit Taraba communities
-
Sports2 days agoSean Strickland’s First Tweet After He Was Banned From White House




