Sports
WWE Slammed By Former Superstar-Turned-Lawyer Over ‘Hidden’ Contract Clause
WWE contracts have come under the microscope in recent weeks after it was revealed that a number of former performers have had their ability to work elsewhere in the industry restricted. The company is no stranger to releasing Superstars and famously enforces a 90-day non-compete clause whenever they part ways with a main roster talent.
Crucially, though, while those performers can’t work for any other wrestling companies for 90 days, they are still paid for that period. However, it has now emerged that the promotion has slapped a non-compete on two former talent for a lot longer – and done so without paying them.
The issue was first highlighted after WWE ended their relationship with former United States Champion, Andrade. The Mexican Superstar’s second run with the company ended abruptly, reportedly following a violation of the promotion’s wellness policy and other disciplinary issues.
Shortly after leaving WWE, Andrade appeared on television for rival promotion All Elite Wrestling (AEW). He had looked set for a rivalry with top AEW star Kenny Omega, but was never seen or mentioned again on AEW television after his attack on the Canadian.
Mystery surrounded the situation until Fightful confirmed that Andrade was bound by a clause in his WWE contract that prevented him from “working, appearing, or performing in any capacity for any professional wrestling, sports entertainment, mixed martial arts or ultimate fighting organisation” for a period of one year following his WWE departure.
It’s not just in-ring talent that are subject to the clause, either, as former WWE ring announcer Samantha Irvin took to social media earlier this week to let fans know that she was officially one year into her own two-year non-compete clause after deciding to leave the company last October. In the case of both Andrade and Irwin, neither is being paid by WWE during their non-compete periods.
Lawyer Examines Controversial WWE Contracts
Understandably, the fact that WWE is denying both the chance to earn money elsewhere in the wrestling business and offering them no compensation in the process has left fans outraged. Initially, it was speculated that the contract clauses enforcing these extended non-compete periods were an addition made by TKO after they purchased WWE in April 2023.
However, according to Harvard Law School graduate – and former WWE Superstar – David Otunga, the clause has been part of WWE contracts for years. The former tag team champion and founding member of the Nexus dug out a copy of his WWE contract from 2017 to confirm that the one-year non-compete is actually a standard inclusion in all WWE Superstar deals.
In a video on his YouTube channel, Otunga explained that WWE’s traditional 90-day non-compete clauses aren’t a part of Superstar contracts. He speculated that WWE likely cuts the non-competes from one-year to 90 days as a ‘goodwill gesture’.
“It’s 90 days when talents are still being paid. They just can’t go to a rival company. This is WWE, in essence, ‘being nice’ and not enforcing the full force of the contract. It’s really WWE being smart because they are trying to keep these disputes out of court.”
Otunga went on to explain why WWE might be keen to avoid the courts taking a look at the deals that they have in place with performers:
“They don’t want talent to take them to court and challenge this because a judge would likely rule this invalid. The fact that you’re preventing somebody from working to support themselves for an entire year and you’re not compensating them… I don’t know how they could enforce this.”
As it stands today, both Andrade and Irwin both have approximately one year left on their WWE non-compete periods. Assuming Otunga is accurate in his statements, it would likely take far longer than 12 months for a case to be heard, likely meaning the non-competes will not be challenged.
Sports
FIFA ‘Confirm’ Argentina World Cup Decision After Lifetime Ban Petition Goes Viral
FIFA have made a decision over Argentina after millions signed a petition demanding the South American nation are handed a permanent ban from future World Cup finals.
A staggering 23,316,108 people signed the “Leave, Argentina” petition, which reportedly called for a lifetime ban on the Argentina national team, according to Euro News, via GOAL.
Argentina’s ‘dirty’ tactics during the 2026 World Cup, followed by the unsavoury post-match altercations that marred the final against Spain at the New York New Jersey Stadium on July 19, left a bitter taste in the mouths of football fans all over the world.
Argentina’s players were criticised further after they were seen with their backs turned while Spain’s Rodri lifted the World Cup trophy.
Defender Lisandro Martinez has now provided an explanation, insisting Argentina’s players were not deliberately snubbing their Spanish counterparts.
Meanwhile, FIFA are continuing their investigation into the post-match behaviour of Argentina’s players and coaching staff to determine whether their disciplinary code was violated.
FIFA ‘Confirm’ World Cup Decision Over Argentina
While individual players are at risk of being punished by FIFA, there are no suggestions that Argentina will be blocked from competing in future tournaments.
In fact, talkSPORT say FIFA have now confirmed that all six host nations for the 2030 World Cup will automatically qualify, meaning Argentina are guaranteed a spot at the next tournament.
Argentina, along with Uruguay and Paraguay, are set to host one match each during the 2030 World Cup finals. The games will take place in the three countries’ capital cities: Buenos Aires, Montevideo and Asuncion, respectively.
Spain, Portugal and Morocco are the three main co-hosts of the next World Cup, but three matches will be played in South America to mark the 100th anniversary of the first-ever World Cup finals, hosted by Uruguay in 1930.
⚽
World Cup History Quiz
You scored
out of 20
Lionel Messi’s Chances of Making 2030 World Cup
It’s unlikely that Argentina’s legendary captain Lionel Messi will be part of the squad that attempts to win the World Cup trophy back in four years’ time.
The 39-year-old was sensational in North America up until the final, scoring eight goals and registering a further four assists.
Messi will turn 43 years old midway through the 2030 World Cup and may have already retired by the time the tournament begins.
One of Messi’s teammates has brought the curtain down on his international career following the World Cup final defeat to Spain. Defender Nicolas Otamendi, 38, released an emotional statement last week confirming he will no longer represent La Albiceleste after 139 appearances.
Sports
Tyson Fury Breaks Silence on Anthony Joshua vs Kristian Prenga
Tyson Fury has broken his silence after Anthony Joshua‘s come-from-behind win over Kristian Prenga on Saturday night.
After being knocked down twice in the first round and seemingly being on the way to suffering a seismic upset, Joshua recovered in the second to claim victory over Prenga.
It was the first time the 36-year-old had been in the ring since the death of his friends, Latif Ayodele and Sina Ghami, when visiting Nigeria in December 2025.
Surviving the chaos, the former two-time heavyweight champion unsurprisingly cut an emotional figure afterward, claiming it was what champions do: “We rise, we get knocked down, and we stand up, and we keep going, that’s life’s motto.”
It now sets up a long-awaited Brit super fight against Fury which has been building for more than a decade. While Fury himself was not at the fight, he’s now revealed his thoughts on AJ’s chaotic showing.
Tyson Fury vs Anthony Joshua Explored
The prospect of a fight between Fury and Joshua first materialised back in 2016.
Mandatory challengers and rematch clauses, though, consiistently derailed that prospect becoming a reality. Perhaps most notably of all, back in 2021, when an undisputed heavyweight championship fight was on the table. However, it didn’t happen as Deontay Wilder exercised a rematch clause against Fury. Wilder went on to lose their trilogy fight by 11th-round knockout.
Joshua then lost his titles, as did Fury, both to the same man: Oleksandr Usyk.
Finally, earlier this year, it was revealed that the fight was on the verge of happening.
Joshua was ringside as Fury defeated Arslanbek Makhmudov, where the latter did declare his intention to face AJ. Joshua refused to get into the ring, though.
Despite Joshua’s hesitation, the pair signed a contract to fight each other before the end of 2026. Both men have since won their latest warm-up fights, Fury in front of just 1,500 spectators in Thailand against Mariusz Wach, Joshua in what some have felt were controversial circumstances versus Prenga.
But regardless, the path is now clear for Joshua and Fury to finally meet. So, what did the Gypsy King make of his rival’s performance on Saturday night?
Tyson Fury’s Reaction to Joshua vs Prenga
After doing his part against Wach, Fury was watching on like many others as Joshua took to the ring to take on Prenga.
Fury, commenting on a social media video from Turki Alashikh showing highlights of the clash, was abrupt in his initial reaction. “Wow, wtf,” he wrote.
The Gypsy King would later pen an Instagram post of his own. Sharing an image of the official fight poster for his clash with Joshua, Fury stated:
“Next stop. I’m gonna beat this p**** up real bad. The biggest fight in British history. Let’s see if he’s got the balls to fight in November. I’ll be ready. Let’s rock and roll. Over a decade in the making.”
It is worth pointing out that while Fury tagged both Netflix and Alalshikh in his post, he did not tag Joshua himself. The planned date and location for the fight has already been leaked, although there has been no official confirmation from promoters.
Sports
Chelsea’s £75m Pedro Neto Valuation Soars Amid Man City and Liverpool Links
Chelsea are keeping a keen eye on transfer speculation surrounding Paris Saint-Germain winger Bradley Barcola and RB Leipzig forward Yan Diomande this summer.
The Blues have been linked with both players since the opening of the window, but the £117 million spent on Morgan Rogers has made the London outfit outsiders for another marquee winger arrival.
Nonetheless, chiefs at Stamford Bridge are monitoring the fees being demanded for Barcola and Diomande as they shape their own plans for outgoings. Pedro Neto has been linked with an exit from Chelsea as Manchester City and Liverpool weigh up a move for the Portugal international.
Chelsea ‘not surprised’ by Pedro Neto interest
The Daily Mail had reported on Sunday that Chelsea are ‘not surprised’ by interest in Neto but, even with the arrival of Rogers, will not allow the player to leave for cheap. The Blues are aware of the premium being paid for wide men this summer.
Chelsea are believed to be using the fees demanded for Barcola and Diomande to set their asking price for Neto. Both PSG and RB Leipzig are expected to command around £100 million or more for their players.
Goal reports that while Chelsea are aware that Neto would struggle to fetch the same price, he should be valued in that ballpark. The 26-year-old managed 20 goal contributions last season – Barcola chalked up the same number, with Diomande managing 23.
Chelsea paid £54 million to sign Neto from Wolves in 2024 and are now expected to demand above £75 million, a figure that would rise should fees for Barcola and Diomande soar.
Enzo Maresca linked with Neto reunion at Man City
Neto is not actively being touted for sale by Chelsea. The winger is not currently on pre-season tour with the Blues in Sydney, but that is not due to transfer speculation.
The forward has been given an extended holiday having been involved with Portugal at the World Cup. Neto is under contract at Stamford Bridge until 2031.
Manchester City and Liverpool are the two clubs said to be interested in the player’s services, although links with the Reds would likely drop should Andoni Iraola’s side sign Barcola from PSG.
Fees correct prior to summer 2026
All 10 found — excellent!
A move to the Etihad Stadium would see Neto reunite with former Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca, who favoured the winger on the right flank while in charge at the Bridge.
The Italian was outspoken in praising Neto’s ability on the ball, and his attitude off it. Maresca said: “It’s on the ball and it’s off the ball, it’s on both sides that Pedro is doing fantastic.
“If you just attack and you are not able to defend, you don’t play many games, in my view. In terms of sacrifice, Pedro has been top since we started together.”
-
Sports1 day agoFabrizio Romano Issues ‘Here We Go’ for Arsenal’s Axel Donczew Transfer
-
Sports1 day agoSimon Jordan Claims Anthony Joshua vs Kristian Prenga was ‘Fixed’
-
Metro2 days agoTroops intensify hunt for abducted Zamfara council chairman
-
Metro2 days agoBREAKING: Many feared dead, 30 missing as suspected herdsmen attack Ohimini in Benue
-
Metro2 days agoAnti-illegal mining task force arrests 20 suspects in Taraba
-
Metro2 days agoSuspected Oyo robber arrested as police recover tricycle stolen in Kwara
-
Sports2 days agoAlan Shearer’s Telling Comments as Daughter Marries Joe Marchant
-
Sports2 days agoCeltic Agree Club-Record Deal to Sign Kasper Hogh
