World News
A Chinese firm bought an insurer for CIA agents
Getty ImagesSince 2018, the United States has been tightening its laws to prevent its rivals from buying into its sensitive sectors – blocking investments in everything from semiconductors to telecommunications.
But the rules weren’t always so strict.
In 2016, Jeff Stein, a veteran journalist covering the US intelligence community, got a tip-off: a small insurance company that specialised in selling liability insurance to FBI and CIA agents had been sold to a Chinese entity.
“Someone with direct knowledge called me up and said, ‘Do you know that the insurance company that insures intelligence personnel is owned by the Chinese?'” he remembers. “I was astonished!”
In 2015, the insurer, Wright USA, had been quietly purchased by Fosun Group, a private company believed to have very close connections with China’s leadership.
US concerns became immediately clear: Wright USA was privy to the personal details of many of America’s top secret service agents and intelligence officials. No one in the US knew who might have access to that information now the insurer and its parent, Ironshore, were Chinese-owned.
Wright USA wasn’t an isolated case.
The BBC has exclusive early access to brand new data that shows how Chinese state money has been flowing into wealthy countries, buying up assets in the US, Europe, the Middle East and Australia.

In the past couple of decades China has become the world’s biggest overseas investor, giving it the potential to dominate sensitive industries, secrets and key technologies. Beijing considers the details of its foreign spending overseas – how much money it’s spending and where – to be a state secret.
But on the terms of the Wright USA sale, Stein says: “There was nothing illegal about it; it was in the open, so to speak. But because everything’s intertwined so closely in Beijing, you’re essentially giving that [information] up to Chinese intelligence.”
The Chinese government was involved in the deal: fresh data seen by the BBC reveals that four Chinese state banks had provided a $1.2bn (£912m) loan, routed through the Cayman Islands, to allow Fosun to buy Wright USA.
Stein’s story ran in Newsweek magazine. And there was a swift reaction in Washington: triggering an inquiry by the branch of the US Treasury that screens investments, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Shortly after, the company was sold again – back to Americans. It’s unclear who ordered that sale.
Fosun and Starr Wright USA, the company that now owns Wright USA, did not respond to a BBC request for comment.
High-level US intelligence sources confirm the Wright USA sale was one of the cases that led the first Trump administration to tighten its investment laws in 2018.
Very few could have understood at the time that this Chinese state-backed spending appears to have been part of a much bigger strategy carried out by Beijing to invest and buy assets in every continent.
“For many years, we assumed that virtually all of China’s money flows were going to developing countries,” says Brad Parks, executive director of AidData. “And so, it came as a great surprise to us when we realised that actually there were hundreds of billions of dollars going into places like the US, the UK and Germany, happening right underneath our noses.”
AidData is a research lab based in Virginia that specialises in tracking how governments spend their money outside their borders. It’s based at William & Mary, one of America’s oldest universities and it gets its funding from governments and charitable organisations around the world. For the past 12 years, AidData has had a major focus on China.
A four-year effort involving 120 researchers has led to the first known effort to tally all of China’s state-backed investments around the world. The group’s entire dataset is available open source although the BBC was given exclusive advance access.
AidData’s key discovery: since 2000, Beijing has spent $2.1 trillion outside its borders, with a roughly equal split between developing and wealthy countries.
Getty Images“China has a kind of financial system that the world has never seen,” says Victor Shih, director of the 21st Century China Centre at University of California San Diego. China has the largest banking system in the world – larger than the US, Europe and Japan put together, he adds.
That size, along with the amount of control Beijing exerts over state banks, gives it unique capabilities.
“The government controls interest rates and directs where the credit goes,” Mr Shih says. “This is only possible with very strict capital control, which no other country could have on a sustainable basis.”
Some of the investments in wealthy economies appear to have been made in order to generate a healthy return. Others fall in line with Beijing’s strategic objectives, set out a decade ago in a major government initiative called Made in China 2025.
In it the Chinese authorities outlined a clear plan to dominate 10 cutting-edge industries, like robotics, electric vehicles and semiconductors by this year.
Beijing wanted to fund big investments abroad so key technologies could be brought back to China.
Global alarm at the plan led China to drop public mention of it, but Victor Shih says it “stayed very much alive” as a guiding strategy.
“There are all kinds of plans still being published,” he says, “including an artificial intelligence plan and a smart manufacturing plan. However, the mother of all plans is the 15th five-year plan.”
At a key meeting of the Communist Party last month, China’s leaders set the goal of accelerating “high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement” until 2030.
AidData’s new database highlights state-backed spending overseas that matches the 10 sectors targeted in 2015. The BBC’s earlier reporting detailed how the Chinese government bankrolled the purchase of a UK semiconductor company.
The United States, the UK and many other major economies have tightened their investment screening mechanisms after each country appears to have been caught off-guard by deals like the sale of the insurer, Wright USA.
AidData’s Brad Parks says wealthy governments didn’t realise at first that Chinese investments in each country were part of Beijing’s larger strategy.
“At first blush, they thought it was just a lot of individual initiative from Chinese companies,” he says. “I think what they’ve learned over time is that actually Beijing’s party state is behind the scenes writing the cheques to make this happen.”
However, it must be underlined that such investments and purchases are legal, even if they are sometimes obscured within shell companies or routed through offshore accounts.
“The Chinese government has always required Chinese enterprises operating overseas to strictly comply with local laws and regulations, and has consistently supported them in conducting international co-operation based on mutual benefit,” the Chinese embassy in London told the BBC.
“Chinese companies not only provide quality products and services to people around the world, but also contribute actively to local economic growth, social development and job creation.”
China’s spending patterns are changing, the AidData database shows, with Beijing’s state money flowing to countries that have decided to welcome Chinese investment.
In the Netherlands there’s been debate around Nexperia, a troubled Chinese-owned semiconductor company.
It shows up in the AidData database too – Chinese state banks loaned $800m to help a Chinese consortium acquire Nexperia in 2017. Two years later, the ownership passed to another Chinese company – Wingtech.
Nexperia’s strategic value was highlighted when the Dutch authorities took control of the company’s operations in September – in part, the Dutch government said, over concerns that Nexperia’s technology was at risk of being transferred to other parts of the larger Wingtech company.
That bold move had resulted in Nexperia effectively being cut into two – separating Dutch operations from its Chinese manufacturing.
Nexperia confirmed to the BBC that its Chinese business had stopped operating within Nexperia’s governance framework and was ignoring instructions.
The company said it welcomed China’s commitment to resuming exports of its critical chips to global markets.
Xioaxue Martin, a research fellow at the Clingendael Institute in The Hague, says many in the Netherlands were surprised at how the government handled the case, since they’ve always managed their relationship with China carefully in the past.
“We’re a country that has always done very well with open trade, free trade. And this is really the merchant side of Dutch policy,” she says. “Only recently we found that actually, hold on – geopolitics makes it necessary to have more industrial policy, to have this investment screening, when in the past there wasn’t that much attention for this.”
Xiaoxue Martin is clear – it’s easy to go too far down the path of fearing what could happen as a result of doing so much business with a superpower like China.
“There’s a danger of making it seem as if China is this monolith, that they all want the same thing, and that they’re all out to get Europe, and to get the United States, when obviously that’s not the case,” she says.
“Most companies, especially if they’re private, they just want to make money. They want to be treated as a normal company. They don’t want to have this negative reception that they’re getting in Europe.”
If China is so far ahead of its rivals in its plans to buy into sensitive sectors, does that mean the race to dominate these arenas is already over?
“No! There’s gonna be multiple laps,” maintains Brad Parks. “There are many Chinese companies that are still trying to make these types of acquisitions. The difference is, now they’re facing higher levels of scrutiny to vet these inbound sources of foreign capital.
“So China makes its move. China is not the follower any more, it is the leader. It is the pace setter. But what I’m anticipating is that many G7 countries are going to move from the back foot to the front foot.
“They’re going to move from defence to offence.”
www.bbc.com
World News
US reportedly pursuing third oil tanker linked to Venezuela
The US Coast Guard is in “active pursuit” of another vessel in international waters near Venezuela, an official has told the BBC’s US partner CBS News, as tensions in the region continue to escalate.
US authorities have already seized two oil tankers this month – one of them on Saturday.
Sunday’s pursuit related to a “sanctioned dark fleet vessel that is part of Venezuela’s illegal sanctions evasion”, a US official said. “It is flying a false flag and under a judicial seizure order.”
Washington has accused Venezuela of using oil money to fund drug-related crime, while Venezuela has described the tanker seizures as “theft and kidnapping”.
US President Donald Trump last week ordered a “blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving the country.
Venezuela – home to the world largest proven oil reserves – has accused the Trump administration of trying to steal its resources.
US authorities have not yet officially confirmed Sunday’s pursuit, and the exact location and name of the tanker involved is not yet known.
As of last week, more than 30 of the 80 ships in Venezuelan waters or approaching the country were under US sanctions, according to data compiled by TankerTrackers.com.
Saturday’s seizure saw a Panamanian-flagged tanker boarded by a specialised tactical team in international waters.
That ship is not on the US Treasury’s list of sanctioned vessels, but the US has said it was carrying “sanctioned PDVSA oil”. In the past five years the ship also sailed under the flags of Greece and Liberia, according to records seen by BBC Verify.
“These acts will not go unpunished,” the Venezuelan government said in response to Saturday’s incident. It added that it intended to file a complaint with the UN Security Council and “other multilateral agencies and the governments of the world”.
Venezuela is highly dependent on revenues from its oil exports to finance its government spending.
In recent weeks, the US has built up its military presence in the Caribbean Sea and has carried out deadly strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling boats, killing around 100 people.
It has provided no public evidence that these vessels were carrying drugs, and the military has come under increasing scrutiny from Congress over the strikes.
The Trump administration has accused Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of leading a designated-terrorist organisation called Cartel de los Soles, which he denies.
www.bbc.com
World News
In rebel-held Myanmar, civilians flee junta airstrikes and a forced election
Yogita LimayeSouth Asia and Afghanistan correspondent in Myanmar
BBCLate one night last month Iang Za Kim heard explosions in a neighbouring village, then fighter jets flying overhead. She ran out of her home to see smoke rising from a distance.
“We were terrified. We thought the junta’s planes would bomb us too. So we grabbed what we could – some food and clothes and ran into the jungles surrounding our village.”
Iang’s face quivers as she recounts the story of what happened on 26 November in K-Haimual, her village in Myanmar’s western Chin State, and then she breaks down.
She’s among thousands of civilians who’ve fled their homes in recent weeks after the Burmese military launched a fierce campaign of air strikes, and a ground offensive in rebel-held areas across the country, to recapture territory ahead of elections starting on 28 December.
Four other women sitting around her on straw mats also start crying. The trauma of what they’ve gone through to make it to safety is clearly visible.
While the air strikes were the immediate cause for Iang to flee, she also doesn’t want to be forced to participate in the election.
“If we are caught and refuse to vote, they will put us in jail and torture us. We’ve run away so that we don’t have to vote,” she says.

Some from Chin state have described the junta’s latest offensive as the fiercest it has launched in more than three years.
Many of the displaced have sought refuge in other parts of the state. Iang is among a group that crossed the border into India’s Mizoram state. Currently sheltered in a rundown badminton court in Vaphai village, the group’s few belongings they were able to carry are packed in plastic sacks.
Indian villagers have given them food and basic supplies.
Ral Uk Thang has had to flee his home at the age of 80, living in makeshift shelters in jungles for days, before finally making it to safety.
“We’re afraid of our own government. They are extremely cruel. Their military has come into our and other villages in the past, they’ve arrested people, tortured them, and burned down homes,” he says.
It isn’t easy to speak to Burmese civilians freely. Myanmar’s military government does not allow free access in the country for foreign journalists. It took over the country in a coup in February 2021, shortly after the last election, and has since been widely condemned for running a repressive regime that has indiscriminately targeted civilians as it looks to crush the armed uprising against it across Myanmar.
During its latest offensive, the junta last week targeted a hospital in Rakhine State, just south of Chin State. Rebel groups in Rakhine say at least 30 people were killed and more than 70 injured.
The Chin Human Rights Organisation says that since mid-September at least three schools and six churches in Chin State have been targeted by junta airstrikes, killing 12 people including six children.

The BBC has independently verified the bombing of a school in Vanha village on 13 October. Two students –Johan Phun Lian Cung, who was seven, and Zing Cer Mawi, 12 – were killed as they were attending lessons. The bombs ripped through their classrooms injuring more than a dozen other students.
Myanmar’s military government did not respond to the BBC’s questions about the allegations.
This is the second time Bawi Nei Lian and his young family – a wife and two young children – have been displaced. Back in 2021, soon after the coup, their home in Falam town was burnt down in an air strike. They rebuilt their lives in K-Haimual village. Now they’re homeless again.
“I can’t find the words to explain how painful and hard it is and what a difficult decision it was to make to leave. But we had to do it to stay alive,” he says.
“I want the world to know that what the military is claiming – that this election is free and fair – this is absolutely false. When the main political party is not being allowed to contest the election, how can there be genuine democracy?”

The National League for Democracy party, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, which won landslides in the two elections prior to the coup, will not be contesting as most of its senior leaders including Suu Kyi are in jail.
“We don’t want the election. Because the military does not know how to govern our country. They only work for the benefit of their high-ranking leaders. When Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s party was in power, we experienced a bit of democracy. But now all we do is cry and shed tears,” says Ral Uk Thang.
Iang Za Kim believes the election will be rigged. “If we voted for a party not allied with the military, I believe they will steal our votes and claim we voted for them.”
The election will take place in phases, with a result expected around the end of January. Rebel groups have called it a sham.
At the base of the Chin National Front in Myanmar, the most prominent rebel group operating in the state, the group’s Vice Chairman Sui Khar says: “This election is only being held to prolong military dictatorship. It’s not about the people’s choice. And in Chin State, they hardly control much area, so how can they hold an election?”
He points out the areas where the most intense fighting is ongoing on a map and tells us nearly 50 rebel fighters have been injured in just the past month. There have been deaths too, but so far the groups have not released a number.
“There are columns of hundreds of soldiers trying to advance into the northern part of Chin state from four directions,” Sui Khar says. “The soldiers are being supported by air strikes, artillery fire and by drone units.”

Access to the base is extremely rare. Set amid thickly forested mountains, it is the heart of the resistance against the junta in Chin state.
Sui Khar takes us to the hospital at the base. We see a group of injured fighters who were brought in overnight and had to undergo hours of surgery. Some of them have had to undergo amputations.
Many of them were just schoolboys when the coup occurred in 2021. Just about adults now, they’ve let go of their dreams to fight on the frontline against the junta.
Abel, 18, is in too much pain to speak. He was with a group of fighters trying to take back territory the junta captured a week ago. They won the battle, but Abel lost his right leg and has serious injuries to his hands as well.
In a bed next to him is Si Si Maung, 19, who’s also had a leg amputated.
“As the enemy was retreating we ran forward and I stepped on a landmine. We were injured in the explosion. Then we were attacked from the air. The airstrikes make things very difficult for us,” he says. “I’ve lost a leg, but even if I’ve to give up my life I’m happy to make the sacrifice so that future generations have a better life.”
The impact of the ferocity of the latest offensive is visible in room after room at the hospital.
Yet, it’s the support and grit of tens of thousands of youngsters like Si Si Maung, who picked up arms to fight against the junta, that have helped the rebels make rapid advances against a much more powerful rival in the past four-and-a-half years.
Some like 80-year-old Ral Uk Thang hope that after the election, the junta will retreat, and he will be able to go back home.
“But I don’t think I will live to see democracy restored in Myanmar,” he says. “I hope my children and grandchildren can witness it some day.”
Additional reporting by Aamir Peerzada, Sanjay Ganguly and Aakriti Thapar
www.bbc.com
World News
A memorial ends – but Bondi tragedy has left Australia reeling, again
Tiffanie TurnbullBondi Beach
Getty ImagesAs helicopters circled overhead, sirens descended on her suburb, and people ran screaming down her street on 14 December, Mary felt a grim sense of deja vu.
“That was when I knew there was something seriously wrong – again,” she says, her eyes brimming with tears.
Mary – who did not want to give her real name – was at the Westfield Bondi Junction shopping centre last April when six people were stabbed to death by a man in psychosis, a tragedy still fresh in the minds of many.
Findings from a coronial inquest into the incident were due to be delivered this week, but were delayed after two gunmen unleashed a hail of bullets on an event marking the start of the Jewish festival of Hanukkah eight days ago.
Declared a terror attack by police, 15 people were shot and killed, including a 10-year-old girl who still had face paint curling around her eyes.
The first paramedic to confront the bloody scenes at the Chanukah by the Sea event was also the first paramedic on the scene at the Westfield stabbings.
“You just wouldn’t even fathom that something like this would happen,” 31-year-old Mary, who is originally from the UK, tells the BBC. “I say constantly to my family at home how safe it is here.”
This was the overarching sentiment in the days following the shooting. This kind of thing, mass murder, just doesn’t happen in Australia.
But it can and it has – twice, in the same community, within 18 months.
A sea of flowers left by shocked and grieving people at Bondi is being packed up. A national day of reflection is over. On Sunday night, Jewish Australians lit candles for the last time this Hannukah.
But the two tragedies have left scores physically scarred and traumatised, and the nation’s sense of safety shattered.
‘Everyone knows someone affected’
EPABondi is Australia’s most famous beach – a globally recognised symbol of its way of life.
It’s also a quintessential slice of Australian community. There’s a bit of “everyone knows everyone” – and that means everyone knows someone affected by the 14 December tragedy, mayor Will Nemesh told the BBC.
“One of the first people I texted was [Rabbi] Eli Schlanger. And I said, ‘I hope you’re OK. Call me if you need anything’,” he said.
But the British-born father of five, also known as the “Bondi Rabbi”, was among the dead.
The first responders, police and paramedics would have been working on members of their own community. Others had the task of having to treat the shooters who had taken aim at their colleagues.
“[Westfield Bondi Junction] was horrendous, something we’re certainly not used to. And then this again was massive, catastrophic injuries,” Ryan Park, health minister for New South Wales, told the BBC.
“They’ve seen things that are like you would see in a war zone… You don’t get those images out of your head,” Park added.
Mayor Nemesh fears this will forever be a stain on Bondi, and Australia.
“If this can happen here at Bondi Beach, it really could happen anywhere… the impact has reverberated around Australia.”
EPA‘Warnings ignored’
No one is feeling this more than the Jewish community, for whom Bondi has become a sanctuary.
“I swam here every day for years on end, rain or shine. And this week… I couldn’t get in the water. It didn’t feel right. It felt sacrilegious in some way,” Zac Seidler, a local clinical psychologist, told the BBC.
Many of the victims of the attack moved here over many decades for safety from persecution, including 89-year-old Holocaust survivor Alex Kleytman. Instead, his life was bookended by violent acts of antisemitic hate.
Mr Seidler has spent the past two years trying to convince his grandparents, who are also Holocaust survivors, to hold on to their belief in the good of humanity.
“[My grandmother] kept saying, ‘These are the signs. I’ve seen this before’. And I just kept saying, ‘Not in Australia, not here. You’re safe’, just trying to soothe her.
“But now I kind of feel like the fool.”
No community is a monolith, but one thing many Jewish Australians believe is that warnings about a rise of antisemitism in the months preceding this attack were ignored.
The year started with a spate of vandalism and arson incidents on Jewish marks in the suburbs surrounding Bondi. It has ended with mass murder targeting their community.
There has been resistance in the face of fear – some leaders urging Jewish Australians to double down, be more publicly Jewish and display their religious symbols with pride.
One woman perusing the flowers outside the Bondi Pavilion on Sunday admits she is too scared to do that. It took her all week to even work up the courage to visit this site, which is just metres from where many of the victims died.
“I’ve never felt my Jewishness before. I’ve never experienced antisemitism in my whole life until now,” MaryAnne says. “And now, I don’t want to wear my Star of David.”
Community, anger and sadness
The shooting triggered a massive outpouring of support from around the nation.
When the news broke, many in the community rallied to help.
Lifeguards – volunteer and paid – put their lives on the line. Restaurants opened their doors and hid people in their store rooms and freezers, and locals ushered lost children into their apartments.
Even the New South Wales opposition leader Kellie Sloane – also the local state member – was at the scene, helping pack bullet wounds.
In the days after the shooting, thousands of ordinary Australians lined up – many for hours on end – to donate blood desperately needed to treat those injured.
Each day, a carpet of petals, handwritten notes, commemorative stones and candles grew out from the gates of the Bondi Pavilion.
Bee motifs – stickers, balloons, even pavement art – are all over the suburb, in remembrance of Matilda, the terror attack’s youngest victim.
Surfers and swimmers on Friday paddled out beyond Bondi’s iconic breaks to honour those who died.
A day later, surf livesavers and lifeguards stood shoulder to shoulder on the beach in solidarity with the Jewish community.
But amid the platitudes, sadness and shock is calcifying into anger and tension.
Last year’s Bondi Junction stabbings were devastating for the community – but a shared resolution united it.
Experts say the attacker, who had schizophrenia, was in psychosis at the time of the stabbings, and his family have previously said he was frustrated at being unable to find a girlfriend. The question of whether he targeted women will likely forever go unanswered. But clear failures in the mental health system have been identified.
Last month, families of the victims asked the coroner to refer the doctor who weaned him off medication with limited supervision to regulators for investigation, and they have also argued for a massive boost to mental health service funding.
But last Sunday’s events raise more uncomfortable feelings and questions.
There is palpable fury at the government, over a perceived – and admitted – failure to do more to stop antisemitism. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been booed during public appearances this week, and talking to people visiting the site of the attack in Bondi, it isn’t uncommon to hear them demand his resignation.
Many people the BBC spoke to pointed to his government’s decision to recognise Palestinian statehood, alongside countries including the UK and Canada, and regular protests in Australia by members of the pro-Palestinian movement, which though largely peaceful but have been peppered with antisemitic chants and placards.
The state of New South Wales – which has in recent years tightened protest rules – has already announced it will introduce more legislation cracking down on “hateful” chants and give police more powers to investigate demonstrators. The federal government has promised similar.
The blame apportioned to these protests does not sit right with many, even some sections of the Jewish community.
“We need to hold multiple truths,” Mr Seidler says. “We can be afraid, we can feel that there is deep antisemitic rhetoric going on in certain circles within Australia… while also understanding that there is a right of people in this country – especially Muslim Australians – to be concerned about what is taking place in Gaza.
“We need to get better at finding that line and calling out when that line has been crossed.”
Getty ImagesFor others, there is anger at what they feel is the politicisation of a tragedy.
“It’s a bloody photo op,” one woman tells me on Sunday, as a prominent Australian businesswoman arrives and begins posing with the floral tributes outside the Bondi Pavilion.
Some – including the local federal MP Allegra Spender – worry the attack is being used to fuel anti-immigration sentiment.
“We would not have had the man who saved so many Australians if we had cut off, for instance, Muslim immigration,” she said.
Mr Seidler says these arguments fail to recognise that antisemitic views – and other forms of bigotry – are formed here too.
“I heard someone say the other day that Australia thinks it’s on a holiday from history, that we’re somehow immune to this stuff, that it’s not bred here, it’s imported,” Mr Seidler says.
With the anger, there is also fear: for the Jewish community of other attacks, for the Muslim community of retaliation for an act of terror they have loudly condemned.
There are questions over how Australia’s security agency fumbled an alleged terrorist who at one point was on their watch list, prompting a review into federal police and intelligence agencies that was announced on Sunday.
There is frustration at NSW Police, who have for years been warned by the Muslim community of hate preachers poaching their young men.
There is animosity towards the media, driven by hurt among both Jewish and Arab Australians over a belief they and their communities have been misrepresented, and frustration at what some feel is incitement against them.
But there is also a queasiness at the treatment of traumatised victims throughout this week, some of whom were interviewed live on television while the blood of their friends still stained their hands.
Through it all, is an undercurrent of suspicion of institutions and each other.
There are varying opinions on how those rifts can heal – or even if they can. But there is a shared determination to try.
EPAOne UK expat who was at the beach at the time of the shooting says everyone he speaks to is adamant this will not change Bondi, or Australia.
“It’s seriously unique what you have as a nation… there’s a magic about it,” Henry Jamieson tells the BBC.
“I’m traumatised… and I’m going to have to deal with that for the rest of my life, I know I am… even people who weren’t there were traumatised.
“But I’m not gonna let it shake me and we will not let it shake this community.
“You can’t let them win,” he says of the alleged terrorists.
At an emotional memorial on Sunday night, seven days since the attack, the same sense of defiance was on show. It ended with the lighting of the menorah, something the crowds gathered for Hannukah last week never got to do.
The shamash, the centre candle, was lit by the father of Ahmed al Ahmed, in honour of his bravery in wrestling a gun off one of the attackers. The children of the two rabbis who were killed lit another. Others were lit by a representative of surf lifesavers and a Jewish community medic who rushed to the scene and began treating the injured before the shots had even stopped. The final candle was lit by Michael, the father of Matilda, who has been described a fountain of joy to all who knew her.
After the parade of diverse Australians had sparked flames on each arm of the menorah, Rabbi Yehoram Ulman of Bondi Chabad made a plea for more love and more unity.
“Returning to normal is not enough,” he said.
“Sydney can and must become a beacon of goodness. A city where people look out for one another, where kindness is louder than hate, where decency is stronger than fear, and we can make it happen,” he said, stopping for a moment as the crowd applauded.
“But only if we take the feelings we have right now and turn them into action, into continuous action.”
www.bbc.com
-
Sports1 day agoYaya Toure to Take Charge of Slovan Bratislava in First Manager Job
-
Sports14 hours agoWhy Cristiano Ronaldo Stands Sideways During Portugal’s National Anthem
-
Sports17 hours agoWhy Rio Ngumoha Can’t be Called into England’s World Cup Squad
-
Sports16 hours agoBarcelona Fans Unimpressed by Anthony Gordon
-
Sports13 hours agoF1 Rules Kim Kardashian Must Follow While Supporting Lewis Hamilton
-
Sports1 day agoRio Ngumoha is Not Allowed in Liverpool or England’s Dressing Room
-
Sports19 hours agoLee Dixon’s Commentary on Kobbie Mainoo vs New Zealand Slammed
-
Sports2 days agoTensions Boil Over Between F1 Teammates in X-Rated Radio Exchange


