Connect with us

Sports

Paul Scholes Drops Honest Verdict on West Ham v Arsenal VAR Call

Published

on


Manchester United legend Paul Scholes has stunned Arsenal fans with his honest verdict on this season’s most controversial VAR call, which saw relegation-threatened West Ham denied an equalising goal against Arsenal at the London Stadium on Sunday.

Callum Wilson sent the home supporters wild with a last-gasp strike following a corner, only for the goal to be chalked off after a lengthy VAR review. West Ham forward Pablo was penalised for a foul on Arsenal goalkeeper David Raya.

The decision threatened to have ramifications either way. Referee Chris Kavanagh’s decision to disallow the goal has left 18th-placed West Ham on the verge of relegation to the Championship with two matches remaining.

At the opposite end of the table, Arsenal have opened up a five-point lead over Manchester City heading into the final two weekends of the 2025-26 campaign.

The controversial VAR call has split opinion. Former Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg believes the correct decision was made, as does ex-assistant ref Darren Cann, who has called for a rule change on corners.

Others believe West Ham have been robbed of a precious point and have highlighted examples of Arsenal getting away with similar ‘fouls’ at set-piece situations this season.

Paul Scholes’ Verdict Shocks Arsenal Fans

Paul Scholes
Paul Scholes

One person Arsenal fans were not expected to hear defend them is Paul Scholes. The former United star explained why the correct decision was made and dismissed suggestions that Arsenal have been guilty of similar fouls over the course of the current campaign.

“People are moaning, aren’t they, because Arsenal have done it all year, but they haven’t,” Scholes said on The Good, The Bad & The Football. “They’ve done it legally, though.”

He continued: “It is a foul. There’s two fouls. He’s got his hand on top of him there, you can’t move, and the one where he pulls him.”

“There’s one behind pulling his arm,” Scholes added. “If I put my hand across you there, you can hold that. And he’s a big lad. So that’s strong, you know you can’t move, can’t you?”

Scholes’ former United teammate Nicky Butt added: “VAR’s a disgrace and I hope they get rid of it, to be fair. Literally everyone knows that was a foul. But I don’t think people are arguing the fact that that was a foul. It’s quite obvious it was a foul, but it’s all about what went on previously.” Watch the clip below:

Arsenal supporters on social media have reacted with shock to hear Scholes defend them.

One fan commented on X (Twitter): “Someone do a health check on Paul Scholes, he’s telling the unbiased truth.” Another said:

“My ears must be deceiving me.”

A third supporter wrote: “No way Scholes actually supports us on this. I feel like I’m living in an alternate dimension.”

While another commented: “Nah that’s AI. No way I’m seeing Paul Scholes sticking up for Arsenal in this debate?”

And a fifth fan tweeted: “You know it’s bad when he’s defending us.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Bryce Mitchell Goes Viral For Strong Reaction to Sean Strickland’s White House Ban

Published

on

By


Following the news that Sean Strickland has been banned from attending the UFC Freedom 250 event, a number of fighters have had their say on the matter.

UFC middleweight champion Sean Strickland took to X to confirm he has been instructed not to attend the UFC event, due to take place on the South Lawn of the White House on the 14th of June.

Strickland has claimed that because he has spoken out about President Trump’s associations with Jeffrey Epstein and the Israeli Prime Minister, he has been ordered by Dana White and the rest of the UFC hierarchy to stay away from the Presidential home.

The fall-out has continued, as fellow UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell has had his say on the matter, who is never one to shy away from controversial topics.

What Bryce Mitchell Has Said About Sean Strickland’s Ban

Bryce Mitchell

Reacting to the middleweight champion’s ban, Mitchell said: “I’m not surprised at all.”

The 31-year-old went on to explain how he believes that freedom of speech is an important part of being American and should allow a person to criticise if and when they see fit.

“We ought to be able to criticise our own nation, let alone a foreign nation. [Israel] is the only nation you’re not allowed to criticise. Something’s gonna change, because evil empires won’t last forever.”

Despite siding with Strickland, Mitchell did admit that he would jump at the chance to be a part of the card for UFC Freedom 250.

“I do want to be on the card,” he added, before explaining that he isn’t jealous of the likes of Derrick Lewis, Alex Pereira, and Sean O’Malley. “This is what I gotta say, I ain’t jealous of any of those fighters. I am so happy for those fighters.

“If they need me to fill in, if I’m healthy, hey, I’ll do it.”

Bryce Mitchell’s Previous Controversies

The 18-3 fighter has a history of controversial takes, from claiming COVID-19 was created by the US government, to praising Adolf Hitler and denying that the Holocaust happened, so he probably isn’t someone Sean Strickland sees as a worthwhile advocate.

Mitchell does, however, go on to say that he thinks sport and government shouldn’t go hand in hand.

“But what I think, personally, is that our government has desecrated its role in society by entertaining sports. Our government is to protect and serve the people.”


Sean Strickland at UFC Houston


Sean Strickland Reveals Why He’s Been Banned From White House For UFC Freedom 250

Strickland won’t be at the White House for UFC Freedom 250 and he’s not happy about it.

Mitchell is defiant in his opinion that the UFC should not be working with the White House to host an event, but he does refrain from putting the blame on the likes of Dana White, and says it is an opportunity that the UFC could not turn down. He puts the blame solely on the US government, claiming: “We already have a corrupted government.”

Mitchell is in action this Saturday on the UFC Vegas 118 card when he takes on Satiago Luna.

Continue Reading

Sports

Sean Strickland Reveals Why He’s Been Banned From White House For UFC Freedom 250

Published

on

By


With the UFC White House event just around the corner, one champion has had his say on the whole situation.

The UFC brings the Octagon to the South Lawn of the White House on the 14th of June, with a stacked card including Ilia Topuria returning to face interim lightweight champion Justin Gaethje, and Sean O’Malley, Derrick Lewis, and Alex Pereira all in actions as well, including the latter’s heavyweight debut.

One fighter not involved, however, is Sean Strickland, the only current male American UFC champion, who has been told to stay away from the White House event due to his criticism of President Donald Trump.

Sean Strickland Banned From White House For UFC Freedom 250

Sean Strickland at UFC Houston Press Conference

The middleweight champion has previously been a vocal supporter of Trump. However, he has openly condemned his handling of the Iran war.

On top of this, Strickland has spoken out about President Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein as well as his dealings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


Donald Trump


Donald Trump’s Controversial Plan to Screen UFC Freedom 250 Attendees Has Been ‘Leaked’

The President has strict rules in place…

Strickland has said that he has been informed by the bosses at UFC to not attend the event, saying: “I made fun of Israel and Epstein. The only male American champ banned at the White House.

“The only male American champ banned at the White House because I said Trump is owned by [Netanyahu]. That’s not public opinion, it’s fact.”

Sean Strickland Breaks Silence on White House Ban

The 35-year-old fighter posted a video on X in which he made these claims. He went on to say he still plans to go to the event: “I already bought my plane ticket. I’m gonna bring the belt, get a big f****** bullhorn, and we’re gonna go right up to the gates.

“We’ll let them know what we really think about Trump and Israel.”

The California native has acknowledged that it may not have been the President himself who banned him from UFC White House. He posted on X after the video: “I highly doubt Trump is sitting there saying, ‘Don’t clear Sean.’ I’m sure he knows nothing about me being blacklisted but regardless, it was done.”

Whether the UFC veteran has actually been banned remains to be seen, but the whole situation feels like a WWE storyline. Especially with his threats to turn up at the gates wearing bullhorns.

It wouldn’t be a huge shock if Dana White and co. did in fact ban Strickland. The middleweight champion is a known loose cannon, and with so many issues to address in order for the UFC Freedom 250 to go off without a hitch, it may well be in their best interests to tell him to stay away.

Continue Reading

Sports

Man City Threaten Real Madrid With Legal Action Over Erling Haaland

Published

on

By


Manchester City have released a strong statement after Real Madrid presidential candidate Enrique Riquelme claimed that he will sign Erling Haaland this summer if he’s elected.

Riquelme is going head-to-head with long-serving president Florentino Perez, and has made some outrageous promises if he is to win that battle this Sunday. Not only has he told fans that Haaland will be coming to the Bernabeu, but his Man City teammate Rodri, too.

Perez hasn’t been contested in his role since all the way back in 2004, but his opponent is pulling out all the stops to try and win the election. Riquelme has even stated that Jose Mourinho won’t be his manager, as he has another candidate in mind.

Manchester City Respond to Erling Haaland Claim

Manchester City's Erling Haaland looks on against Nottingham Forest

With Pep Guardiola now gone, speculation around Man City’s star players has ramped up in recent weeks. Riquelme claimed that a release clause was active in Haaland’s contract, and that the player ‘wants to join Real Madrid’.

“Haaland has a release clause and wants to join Real Madrid,” he told a Spanish TV channel. However, that claim has been refuted by the Etihad-based club, who now appear to be considering their options legally. A club statement read:

“The stories which have emerged from Spain regarding the future of Erling Haaland are FALSE.

“There is NO chance of this happening and there is no contractual clause to enable it. We are considering LEGAL ACTION for the use of our player image in this context.”


24 Players Born in England But Represent Other 2026 World Cup TeamsMixCollage-03-Jun-2026-11-31-AM-132


The 24 Players Born in England But Represent Other 2026 World Cup National Teams

England would have an unstoppable starting line-up if these players had chosen to represent the Three Lions

The Citizens’ complaint appears to come from the fact that the host of the show, Pablo Matos, displayed a Real Madrid shirt with the Norwegian’s name on the back of it. They have opted to take a strong stance in response.

Alf-Inge Haaland
Alf-Inge Haaland

Fabrizio Romano posted a statement from both Haaland’s agent, Rafaela Pimenta, and his father. Alf-Inge Haaland said: “All very entertaining but NOT true. We wish all the best for both candidates in the Real Madrid elections.”

It appears extremely unlikely that the Premier League Golden Boot winner will be going anywhere soon. The likes of Bernardo Silva and John Stones have already left Man City along with Guardiola. Haaland will be one of the leaders in the dressing room, looking to put an end to a two-year title drought.

He’d also face stiff competition in Madrid from Kylian Mbappe. Working out a way to play both forwards and Vinicius Junior would be an extremely difficult task. But by City’s account, one we won’t be seeing anytime soon.

Continue Reading

Trending