Yiaga Africa has urged the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to establish a result transmission protocol that clarifies the journey of election results from polling units to their final destination.

Yiaga Africa emphasized the necessity for the public to be informed about the handling of results, asserting that Nigerians require explanations to comprehend the entire result management system.

During a Policy Roundtable on the Electronic Transmission and Collation of Election Results held in Abuja on Thursday, Samson Itodo, the Executive Director of Yiaga Africa, advocated for a transparent and open results management process in anticipation of the Osun State governorship election and the 2027 general elections.

Itodo referenced Yiaga Africa’s policy brief titled “Securing the Vote through Electronic Transmission and Collation of Election Results,” which analyzes the results management framework established by the Electoral Act 2026, along with the INEC Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections, 2026.

Yiaga Africa pointed out that Section 60(3) of the Electoral Act 2026 mandates the electronic transmission of polling unit results (Form EC8A) to the INEC Result Viewing (IReV) portal, transforming the portal from merely a public viewing platform into a legal record instrument. It also stipulates a second, direct transmission of results and accreditation figures to the next level of collation for verification.

Yiaga Africa expressed concern that significant elements of the results management process remain obscured from public view, stating: “For example, results sent from polling units do not appear instantly on the IReV; they undergo an internal backend validation process that INEC has not publicly clarified, leading to results being displayed in batches rather than in real time.

“While the IReV publishes polling unit results (Form EC8A), it does not publish ward (Form EC8B) or local government (Form EC8C) collation results, preventing citizens from independently verifying how polling unit results are collated. In addition, the introduction of the electronic EC8A creates three versions of the same result: the physical result sheet, the scanned image on the IReV, and the electronically transmitted record. Yet there is no clear rule on which version prevails if discrepancies arise.”

Yiaga Africa urged INEC to take measures such as to “publish a protocol on results transmission explaining the full journey of a result from the polling unit to the IReV, including the purpose, operators, and expected duration of the backend validation process, and provide for independent assessment of the upgraded BVAS and IReV.

“Publish ward and local government collation results (Forms EC8B and EC8C) on the IReV, and fulfil the Commission’s longstanding promise to publish polling unit accreditation figures alongside the images of Form EC8A.

“State clearly which result prevails in the event of a discrepancy between the physical EC8A, the scanned copy on the IReV, and the electronically transmitted e-EC8A, and establish a transparent procedure for resolving discrepancies before collation proceeds.

“Redraft Paragraph 40 of the Regulations and Guidelines to state expressly where the validated polling unit result is transmitted to, and to prescribe the form, particulars, procedure, and timeline for recording instances of communication failure.

“Develop a dedicated manual on results management for the training of all personnel involved in the results process, clarifying roles, procedures, and processes at each level of collation and in the event of transmission failure.

“Conduct a robust and publicly observable mock exercise covering accreditation and results transmission for all categories of election, in good time for any necessary changes to be made before the general election, and disclose procurement, technical specifications, and stress-test results.

“Gazette the Regulations and Guidelines in compliance with Section 70 of the Electoral Act 2026, so that their legal status is beyond doubt and all stakeholders understand the rules under which the election will be conducted.”

Yiaga Africa noted that these measures require no legislative amendment and fall squarely within INEC’s existing constitutional and statutory powers.

It added, “Accordingly, they can be implemented in advance of the 2026 Osun Governorship Election and the 2027 General Election. Yiaga Africa further calls on political parties, candidates, election observers, the media, and citizens to sustain vigilant oversight and consistently advocate for a transparent, accountable, and verifiable results management process as an essential safeguard for electoral integrity in future elections.”

.says he neither misled anyone nor acted in bad faith

By James Ogunnaike, Abeokuta

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has responded to former Ogun State Governor, Chief Olusegun Osoba, over claims that he deceived leaders of the Alliance for Democracy (AD) during the political realignments leading to the 2003 general elections, insisting that he neither misled anyone nor acted in bad faith.

In a lengthy letter dated July 23, 2026, titled “Reply to Your Inaccurate Posture: ‘How Obasanjo Deceived Us in 2003′”, Obasanjo described Osoba’s account, published in The Legal Observer on July 20, as “farfetched” and riddled with inaccuracies, omissions and misconceptions.

The former President took particular exception to Osoba’s allegation that he deceived Yoruba political leaders, insisting that his political engagements had always been guided by openness and national interest.

“I take strong and serious objection to your calling me a deceiver because I deceived nobody. I always presented my case and all issues as I had them and as I understood them, no matter whose ox is gored,” Obasanjo wrote.

Obasanjo argued that several political developments preceding his emergence as President in 1999 were unknown to Osoba because they were handled by senior leaders of Afenifere and the AD.

He disclosed that after his release from prison, several groups from across the country urged him to contest for the presidency, including delegations led by Lawan Katsina, the late Chief S.M. Afolabi and Chief Martins Kuye.

According to him, those consultations informed his eventual decision to join the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) after extensive consultations with political leaders across the South-West, North and South-East.

Recalling his engagements with the late Afenifere leader, Chief Abraham Adesanya, Obasanjo said despite being repeatedly told that Yoruba people would not vote for him, he continued to maintain cordial relations with the elder statesman.

“There was no time I called on Papa Adesanya that I was not well entertained. Yet Papa stood on no vote for me, and I stood on my respect and what was due to him,” he stated.

The former President defended his decision to invite the AD into what he described as a broad-based national government after winning the presidency, saying it was motivated by a desire to promote national unity rather than political weakness.

“Bringing PDP and AD to join me for a sort of national government was not out of weakness; rather, it was out of strength and for the unity and progress of the country.”

Obasanjo also rejected Osoba’s account of events surrounding the attempted impeachment of then Speaker of the House of Representatives, Ghali Na’Abba, alleging instead that the impeachment plot originated from within his own administration.

He claimed that his then Vice-President had encouraged the move while simultaneously pursuing his own presidential ambition.

“The game continued to be played on with me treating it with contempt as I had committed no impeachable offence,” he wrote.

On the 2003 elections, Obasanjo disputed Osoba’s suggestion that the defeat of AD governors resulted from political manipulation by the Presidency.

Instead, he maintained that the electoral outcome reflected the political realities at the time.

“Your loss or defeat in 2003 was genuine in all the six states except the one where the figures were successfully and murderously changed,” he asserted.

The former President further accused some AD leaders of embracing what he described as an anti-democratic political arrangement allegedly promoted by his Vice-President without verifying the claims with him.

He maintained that he had consistently rejected ethnic politics, insisting that Nigeria’s presidency should never be viewed through a tribal lens.

“I have never believed in tribal politics,” Obasanjo declared.

While criticising Osoba’s interpretation of events, Obasanjo nevertheless acknowledged the former governor’s contributions to Ogun State and to the establishment of the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library (OOPL) in Abeokuta.

He commended Osoba for allocating the land on which the library stands, describing it as a landmark project that has benefited the state.

“The greatest service you rendered for me and for Abeokuta is the land allocated by you for Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library. It has become the most significant landmark in Abeokuta.”

Obasanjo concluded by urging Osoba to embrace humility, gratitude and enduring political relationships, stressing that politics should never destroy personal bonds.

“Politics may end, relationships may live till life’s end… there is no end to humility and thanksgiving.”

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has told President Bola Tinubu that foreign recognition will not secure him another term in office, insisting that Nigerians will judge his administration by its performance, not by diplomatic gestures from other world leaders.

In a statement issued on Thursday by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the opposition party reacted to the Presidency’s celebration of a purported letter from United States President Donald Trump to Tinubu.

The ADC said presenting the letter as an endorsement of Tinubu’s administration was misleading, stressing that diplomatic correspondence between world leaders is a normal part of international relations.

“The Presidency’s attempt to present President Donald Trump’s letter to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as though it were a referendum on the state of the nation is not correct,” the party said.

According to the ADC, countries cooperate, leaders exchange views and letters regularly, adding that such communication does not amount to an endorsement of a government’s performance.

The party accused the Tinubu administration of being desperate for international validation instead of focusing on solving Nigeria’s challenges.

“It is apparent that this administration is desperate to seize upon any gesture of international recognition as proof of success at home,” the statement said.

The ADC maintained that “a letter from a foreign president, however well-intentioned, cannot substitute for the verdict of the Nigerian people.”

It added that the true measure of any government is not what foreign leaders say about it, but what citizens experience daily.

The opposition party argued that Trump’s letter had not changed the reality facing millions of Nigerians, especially those affected by insecurity.

“For the millions of Nigerians still living with the consequences of this government’s failures, President Trump’s communication changes nothing. It did not say that insecurity has been overcome or that Nigerians can once again travel freely, farm safely and sleep without fear,” the party stated.

The ADC also pointed to the continued captivity of hundreds of women and children in parts of Borno State and Kaiama in Kwara State, while many communities in Benue and other parts of the country still live in constant fear because of insecurity.

The party further noted that, despite the Presidency’s celebration of the letter, the United States Department of State has not changed its travel advisory for Nigeria.

According to the ADC, several Nigerian states remain under Level 3 and Level 4 travel advisories, with American citizens still being urged to reconsider or avoid travel because of crime, terrorism, kidnapping and civil unrest.

“We therefore wonder how correspondence from a government that designates several Nigerian states as ‘Do Not Travel’ areas can be regarded as an endorsement,” the party said.

It argued that the travel advisory shows the international assessment of Nigeria’s security situation remains different from the image the Presidency is trying to project.

The ADC said Nigerians are more concerned about their safety than diplomatic exchanges between presidents.

“The daily reality of Nigerians is shaped not by diplomatic correspondence, but by the guarantee that they can go about their lives without falling victim to violent crime or terrorism,” it said.

The party stressed that Trump’s letter was simply communication between two presidents and “does not amount to an endorsement of this government’s overall performance.”

It urged the Tinubu administration to focus less on celebrating diplomatic courtesies and more on delivering measurable improvements in the lives of Nigerians.

“Ultimately, Nigerians will not judge this government by the letters it receives from foreign capitals. They will judge it by whether it improved the lives of the people it was elected to serve,” the statement added.