Connect with us

Sports

Paul Scholes Drops Honest Verdict on West Ham v Arsenal VAR Call

Published

on


Manchester United legend Paul Scholes has stunned Arsenal fans with his honest verdict on this season’s most controversial VAR call, which saw relegation-threatened West Ham denied an equalising goal against Arsenal at the London Stadium on Sunday.

Callum Wilson sent the home supporters wild with a last-gasp strike following a corner, only for the goal to be chalked off after a lengthy VAR review. West Ham forward Pablo was penalised for a foul on Arsenal goalkeeper David Raya.

The decision threatened to have ramifications either way. Referee Chris Kavanagh’s decision to disallow the goal has left 18th-placed West Ham on the verge of relegation to the Championship with two matches remaining.

At the opposite end of the table, Arsenal have opened up a five-point lead over Manchester City heading into the final two weekends of the 2025-26 campaign.

The controversial VAR call has split opinion. Former Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg believes the correct decision was made, as does ex-assistant ref Darren Cann, who has called for a rule change on corners.

Others believe West Ham have been robbed of a precious point and have highlighted examples of Arsenal getting away with similar ‘fouls’ at set-piece situations this season.

Paul Scholes’ Verdict Shocks Arsenal Fans

Paul Scholes
Paul Scholes

One person Arsenal fans were not expected to hear defend them is Paul Scholes. The former United star explained why the correct decision was made and dismissed suggestions that Arsenal have been guilty of similar fouls over the course of the current campaign.

“People are moaning, aren’t they, because Arsenal have done it all year, but they haven’t,” Scholes said on The Good, The Bad & The Football. “They’ve done it legally, though.”

He continued: “It is a foul. There’s two fouls. He’s got his hand on top of him there, you can’t move, and the one where he pulls him.”

“There’s one behind pulling his arm,” Scholes added. “If I put my hand across you there, you can hold that. And he’s a big lad. So that’s strong, you know you can’t move, can’t you?”

Scholes’ former United teammate Nicky Butt added: “VAR’s a disgrace and I hope they get rid of it, to be fair. Literally everyone knows that was a foul. But I don’t think people are arguing the fact that that was a foul. It’s quite obvious it was a foul, but it’s all about what went on previously.” Watch the clip below:

Arsenal supporters on social media have reacted with shock to hear Scholes defend them.

One fan commented on X (Twitter): “Someone do a health check on Paul Scholes, he’s telling the unbiased truth.” Another said:

“My ears must be deceiving me.”

A third supporter wrote: “No way Scholes actually supports us on this. I feel like I’m living in an alternate dimension.”

While another commented: “Nah that’s AI. No way I’m seeing Paul Scholes sticking up for Arsenal in this debate?”

And a fifth fan tweeted: “You know it’s bad when he’s defending us.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Sean Strickland’s First Tweet After He Was Banned From White House

Published

on

By


Following on from his claims about being banned from the UFC Freedom 250 event, set to be held at the White House, Sean Strickland has gone all out in his own polarising way.

The controversial American has posted about being banned from the UFC event on the 14th of June, and instead of seeking any sort of forgiveness, has further pushed the boat out.

The UFC middleweight champion released a video on X saying he had been banned from attending the event due in part to his outspoken views on President Donald Trump’s handling of the Iran conflict, as well as his associations with Jeffrey Epstein and the Israeli government.

Strickland last entered the Octagon in May, when he took the middleweight title off of Khamzat Chimaev, so it would have been very unlikely that he would fight again at this event. Despite that, Dana White and the rest of the UFC hierarchy have made it clear to the 35-year-old that he is not welcome to attend UFC White House.

It seems that Tarzan hasn’t taken the news particularly well, as he has jumped on social media to double down on his opinions.

Sean Strickland’s Reaction to Being Banned From White House

Sean Strickland

The veteran has never been afraid to speak his mind, and is known as a loose cannon, which helps explain why he has been told to stay away from what is already looking like a controversial event.

Only hours after releasing a video in which he explains why he has been blacklisted from Washington DC, he posted an AI image of himself wearing his usual fighting gear, as well as a fedora, a large trench coat, as well as sporting payots, in an attempt to look Jewish.


Bryce Mitchell


Controversial UFC Fighter Goes Viral For Strong Reaction to Sean Strickland’s White House Ban

Bryce Mitchell, as always, has reacted honestly to the ban of Sean Strickland from UFC Freedom 250.

Strickland posted a caption on the AI-generated image saying: “Going to the White House was promised to me 3,000 years ago.”

The reference is seen as an anti-Semitic slur regarding the Torah teachings where God promised the land of Israel to the Jewish people 3,000 years ago.

Sean Strickland Gets Into War of Words With Justin Gaethje

The controversial UFC fighter didn’t stop there, though. He has been very active on X giving his opinions on the matter, and has even begun feuding with other fighters, such as Justin Gaethje, on the platform.

Strickland has always been a controversial figure, and this latest episode doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

Before last month’s win over Chimaev at UFC 328, the veteran called his Russian opponent a ‘terrorist’, while in January, before his bout against Anthony Hernandez, he posted an AI-generated image of himself as a US immigration officer and Hernandez, who is, like Strickland, a California native, in a sombrero and poncho.

Continue Reading

Sports

Net Worth of Every Player in Squad

Published

on

By


How much money do England’s footballers have? That’s a question likely to be on the lips of many football fans as they watch the 2026 World Cup at home this summer.

While we know the weekly wages of the players in Thomas Tuchel’s 26-man squad, the exact net worth of these household names is a little harder to find.

However, The Sun have published a list of every player’s net worth and the results are fascinating. The richest player has earned an astronomical £110 million over the course of his career, while the player in 26th place has only just cracked the £1 million mark. Let’s take a closer look at the list…

England Squad: 2026 World Cup Rich List

26. Nico O’Reilly | £1 million

MixCollage-13-Nov-2025-11-17-PM-6003England's Nico O'Reilly with teammates celebrate after the match

As one of the youngest members of the England squad, it’s no surprise that Manchester City’s Nico O’Reilly is bottom of the pile. Still, a net worth of £1 million at the age of 21 isn’t bad, eh?

25. Elliot Anderson | £2.5 million

Expect the 23-year-old’s net worth to rise considerably if he seals a move away from Nottingham Forest after the World Cup.

24. Djed Spence | £3 million

The Tottenham full-back is next up with a net worth of £3 million.

23. Kobbie Mainoo | £3.5 million

Kobbie Mainoo

Manchester United’s gifted midfielder recently put pen-to-paper on a new five-year contract at Old Trafford, bumping him up to £120,000 a week.

22. Jarell Quansah | £4 million

The 23-year-old defender left Liverpool for Bayer Leverkusen last summer and hasn’t looked back.

21. James Trafford | £4.5 million

Not bad at all for a 23-year-old goalkeeper who currently finds himself as back-up to Gianluigi Donnarumma at Man City.

20. Noni Madueke | £5 million

Noni Madueke

Noni Madueke switched Chelsea for Arsenal last summer and won the Premier League title in his debut season with the Gunners.

19. Tino Livramento | £5.5 million

Newcastle defender Tino Livramento has also crossed the £5 million mark.

18. Dan Burn | £6 million

The oldest members of England’s World Cup squad, not even Dan Burn himself would have expected to be on the plane just a few years ago.

17. Ezri Konsa | £6.5 million

Aston Villa’s Ezri Konsa, 28, is next up with a net worth of £6.5 million.

16. Eberechi Eze | £7 million

Eberechi Eze has enhanced his reputation since leaving Crystal Palace for Arsenal. It’s hard to see him taking a penalty this summer, though, after missing in the Champions League shootout against PSG.

15. Anthony Gordon | £7.5 million

Anthony Gordon

Now a Barcelona player after leaving Newcastle United. Has the opportunity to cement his status as one of the world’s best forwards at Camp Nou.

14. Reece James | £8 million

Gifted and influential full-back when fit, Chelsea’s Reece James has struggled badly with injuries throughout his career but that hasn’t prevented him from banking eight million quid.

13. Marc Guehi | £12 million

Left Crystal Palace for Man City in January and should start for Thomas Tuchel’s England this summer.


24 Players Born in England But Represent Other 2026 World Cup TeamsMixCollage-03-Jun-2026-11-31-AM-132


The 24 Players Born in England But Represent Other 2026 World Cup National Teams

England would have an unstoppable starting line-up if these players had chosen to represent the Three Lions

12. Dean Henderson | £12 million

Dean Henderson

Leaving Manchester United for Crystal Palace in 2023 was a decision Dean Henderson knew he had to make and it’s paid off dividends – in more ways than one.

11. Morgan Rogers | £12.5 million

A star player for Aston Villa, Morgan Rogers will be hoping to make a big impact in North America over the coming weeks.

10. Ivan Toney | £15 million

Ivan Toney

One of the highest-paid players in the Saudi Pro League, Ivan Toney finds himself in the top 10 of England’s rich list.

9. Jordan Henderson | £19.5 million

Endured an ill-fated but lucrative move to Saudi Arabia after leaving Liverpool. Returned to the Premier League with Brentford in 2025 after a season with Dutch giants Ajax.

8. Declan Rice | £20 million

Declan Rice

Among the world’s best midfielders and a contender for the 2026 Ballon d’Or award after an excellent season with Arsenal, Declan Rice’s net worth has crossed the £20 million mark.

7. Ollie Watkins | £21 million

A little surprising to see Ollie Watkins so high up this list? The 30-year-old striker remains one of Villa’s key players.

6. John Stones | £22 million

The classy central defender has left Manchester City and is being linked with a move to Bayern Munich.

5. Bukayo Saka | £23.5 million

Bukayo Saka

Arsenal’s star boy is only 24 years old but has already amassed a fortune during his career to date.

4. Jordan Pickford | £36 million

There’s then a big jump to Jordan Pickford, one of England’s greatest ever goalkeepers, who has bagged a whopping £36 million.

3. Jude Bellingham | £40 million

Jude Bellingham

England’s most marketable player, Real Madrid midfielder Jude Bellingham is only 22 years old but is already absolutely minted.

2. Marcus Rashford | £65 million

Has blown hot and cold throughout his career, but that hasn’t stopped Marcus Rashford from banking an eye-watering £65 million.

1. Harry Kane | £110 million

 Harry Kane

But streets ahead of the rest – and deservedly so, some might say – is England captain Harry Kane. One of the greatest strikers of his generation – and possibly of all time – the prolific Bayern Munich star thoroughly deserves the riches that have come his way.

Continue Reading

Sports

Bryce Mitchell Goes Viral For Strong Reaction to Sean Strickland’s White House Ban

Published

on

By


Following the news that Sean Strickland has been banned from attending the UFC Freedom 250 event, a number of fighters have had their say on the matter.

UFC middleweight champion Sean Strickland took to X to confirm he has been instructed not to attend the UFC event, due to take place on the South Lawn of the White House on the 14th of June.

Strickland has claimed that because he has spoken out about President Trump’s associations with Jeffrey Epstein and the Israeli Prime Minister, he has been ordered by Dana White and the rest of the UFC hierarchy to stay away from the Presidential home.

The fall-out has continued, as fellow UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell has had his say on the matter, who is never one to shy away from controversial topics.

What Bryce Mitchell Has Said About Sean Strickland’s Ban

Bryce Mitchell

Reacting to the middleweight champion’s ban, Mitchell said: “I’m not surprised at all.”

The 31-year-old went on to explain how he believes that freedom of speech is an important part of being American and should allow a person to criticise if and when they see fit.

“We ought to be able to criticise our own nation, let alone a foreign nation. [Israel] is the only nation you’re not allowed to criticise. Something’s gonna change, because evil empires won’t last forever.”

Despite siding with Strickland, Mitchell did admit that he would jump at the chance to be a part of the card for UFC Freedom 250.

“I do want to be on the card,” he added, before explaining that he isn’t jealous of the likes of Derrick Lewis, Alex Pereira, and Sean O’Malley. “This is what I gotta say, I ain’t jealous of any of those fighters. I am so happy for those fighters.

“If they need me to fill in, if I’m healthy, hey, I’ll do it.”

Bryce Mitchell’s Previous Controversies

The 18-3 fighter has a history of controversial takes, from claiming COVID-19 was created by the US government, to praising Adolf Hitler and denying that the Holocaust happened, so he probably isn’t someone Sean Strickland sees as a worthwhile advocate.

Mitchell does, however, go on to say that he thinks sport and government shouldn’t go hand in hand.

“But what I think, personally, is that our government has desecrated its role in society by entertaining sports. Our government is to protect and serve the people.”


Sean Strickland at UFC Houston


Sean Strickland Reveals Why He’s Been Banned From White House For UFC Freedom 250

Strickland won’t be at the White House for UFC Freedom 250 and he’s not happy about it.

Mitchell is defiant in his opinion that the UFC should not be working with the White House to host an event, but he does refrain from putting the blame on the likes of Dana White, and says it is an opportunity that the UFC could not turn down. He puts the blame solely on the US government, claiming: “We already have a corrupted government.”

Mitchell is in action this Saturday on the UFC Vegas 118 card when he takes on Satiago Luna.

Continue Reading

Trending