Connect with us

Sports

10 Premier League clubs who’ve spent the most on manager payouts

Published

on


The sacking of Ange Postecoglou as Nottingham Forest boss last week, less than 20 minutes after his side were beaten 3-0 at home to Chelsea, was the third managerial dismissal in the Premier League this season – and the second at Forest despite there being just eight games played.

Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis, who had a spat with ex-head coach Nuno Espirito Santo, now in charge at West Ham United, has been quick to act this season, with former Tottenham Hotspur boss Postecoglou sacked after just 39 days in the job, paying the price for a winless start under his stewardship, one that had already sown enough seeds of doubt in Marinakis’ mind to see him make a decision.

The stakes are high in the Premier League. For any club outside the so-called ‘big six’, who, even having posted worst-ever seasons in the Premier League era like Manchester United did last season, are in reality too big to fail and fall through the trap door. For those sides, decisions are made based on who will help them qualify for European football, specifically the Champions League.

For the rest, while the odds may be longer for some, staving off relegation worries is the first port of call. The financial price to be paid for dropping out of the Premier League is significant, and can be catastrophic if an immediate rebound back to the promised land isn’t achieved. Despite parachute payments softening the landing on a three-year sliding scale, losing up to 40% of revenue isn’t unheard of.

That’s why snap decisions are made on the future of managers, and why the cost of sacking those who haven’t hit the standards required is seen as a necessary spend in order to protect the major revenue streams that come with Premier League membership. Severance pay can be expensive to shell out for, but it is often a drop in the ocean compared to what the cost of relegation could be, or what missing out on lucrative Champions League revenue could do to the balance sheet and ability to spend and strengthen within the confines of the Premier League’s profit and sustainability regulations (PSR).

The more sackings, the more paid out in severance payments to managers and backroom staff. It also points to a lack of strategy and often reflects poorly on the decision-making of owners or those they have tasked with following through with the call to axe a boss and make a change.

So who leads the way in the Premier League over the past five years when it comes to money shelled out on paying up the contracts of bosses who have failed?

Chelsea (£40m – Frank Lampard, Thomas Tuchel, Graham Potter, Mauricio Pochettino)

chelsea frank lampard

The managerial merry-go-round at Stamford Bridge isn’t something new under the current Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital ownership group, in charge since May 2022, it has been a fixture of Chelsea for some time, right back to the time of Roman Abramovich. With so much invested, returns on the field are expected, and if managers can’t deliver then there is limited patience.

Frank Lampard’s 2021 sacking saw him entitled to around £2m in severance pay, a fairly small sum, but when the current England manager Thomas Tuchel was sacked early in the Boehly/Clearlake project after the two parties failed to align over the club strategy, the cost of sacking the German and his backroom team was in the region of £15m.

Then came Graham Potter. Now, we haven’t included the cost of compensation for hiring managers in this analysis. If we did then that would be some £21.5m added to the list of wasted money after that was what the Blues paid Brighton & Hove Albion for his services in September 2022.

Potter lasted just seven months and 31 matches at Chelsea before being shown the door after poor results, with around £13m paid in compensation to the former Ostersunds boss, who has since been hired and sacked by West Ham United, and this week took on the role of head coach of the Swedish national team.

Then came Mauricio Pochettino. While only a two-year deal, sacking the current Unites States national team manager cost the club around £10m. Enzo Maresca, for now, is faring better than his predecessors, but the amount spent on sacking bosses doesn’t reflect well on ownership.

Tottenham Hotspur (£38m – Jose Mourinho, Nuno Espirito Santo, Antonio Conte, Ange Postecoglou)

Jose Mourinho Claims Two Players Deserve Ballon d’Or - Snubs Dembele & Lamine Yamal

Jose Mourinho Claims Two Players Deserve Ballon d’Or – Snubs Dembele & Lamine Yamal

The Daniel Levy era at Spurs has been over for some weeks now, and while a world-class stadium and strong balance sheet are to show for his time as chairman, making good calls on managers wasn’t a strong suit of leadership over the last five years.

Jose Mourinho’s 2021 exit cost the club £16m, before the very brief stint in the hotseat of another Portuguese manager, Nuno Espirito Santo saw them have to shell out around £14m in compensation for four months work.

Then came Antonio Conte, whose 2018 sacking at Chelsea cost the club more than £25m, although a far smaller payout was due when he left in 2023, this time £4m, the same sum due to Aussie manager Ange Postecoglou when he was fired at the end of last season.

Manchester United (£24.5m – Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, Erik ten Hag)

Former Manchester United manager Erik ten Hag

The threat of the sack may have been hanging over the head of current boss Ruben Amorim like the Sword of Damacles for a little while now, but given the amount already spent on sacking managers it is little surprise they have afforded the former Sporting CP boss more time.

A legend for the club in his playing days, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s reign as boss came to an end in 2021 after 168 games over nearly three years. Bringing an end to his time in the dugout, and that of his coaching staff, cost the club around £10m.

Dutchman Erik ten Hag’s arrival at Old Trafford was seen as ushering in what was hoped would be a successful new era after he impressed as boss of Ajax. But his exit 12 months ago cost the club £14.5m, a figure increased due to the fact that he was handed a rather surprising contract extension after winning the FA Cup some months prior.

Everton (£20.6m – Carlo Ancelotti, Rafael Benitez, Frank Lampard, Sean Dyche)

Real Madrid manager Carlo Ancelotti
Real Madrid manager Carlo Ancelotti

Everton netted some €5m in compensation from Real Madrid when Carlo Ancelotti left Goodison Park in favour of the Santiago Bernabeu in 2021, but the cost of sacking managers has proven to be an expensive business for a club that has been through the financial wringer over the past five years.

Rafa Benitez was an unpopular appointment among many Evertonians from the start, and his exit in 2022 cost the club around £10.5m, a sum recognised as an ‘operating exceptional cost’ in the 2021/22 accounting period in which it fell.

Then came Lampard, whose payout was reflected as £7.1m in the club’s accounts for 2022/23. The exact figures related to the departure of Dyche and his staff last season have not yet been made public, although they will fall in the 2024/25 accounts. A reasonable estimate would be around £3m.

Wolverhampton Wanderers (£13.5m – Nuno Espirito Santo, Bruno Lage, Julen Lopetegui, Gary O’Neil)

West Ham United head coach Nuno Espirito Santo

When Nuno left in May of 2021 after four years in charge at Molineux, he did so at the end of a Premier League campaign and by mutual consent. But with two years remaining he was entitled to a severance package from the club, likely around the £3m mark.

His replacement, Bruno Lage, left in October of 2022 had a little under two years on his deal remaining, and on a similar deal, another £3m ballpark sum was the likely outcome, according to industry analysis.

Then came Julen Lopetegui, who was became the highest paid manager in Wolverhampton Wanderers history when he arrived as Lage’s replacement. But the Spanish boss, currently in charge of the Qatar national team, left a little over a year into his three-year deal. In the club’s accounts for that period, while no figure was placed on his departure it did point to the fact that “operational cost savings were largely offset by the departure of the previous head coach and his coaching team.”

Using that, and taking a broader look at the accounts, suggests a figure of around £4m when staff costs were included for Lopetegui’s severance package. His successor, Gary O’Neil, was understood to be on similar terms, with the terms of his severance also similar, albeit slightly less. With this in mind, a sum of around £3.5m given the length of his deal that remained, which was roughly 18 months.

Nottingham Forest – (£10.5m – Chris Hughton, Steve Cooper, Nuno Espirito Santo, Ange Postecoglou)

ange postecoglou

Chris Hughton’s 2021 exit as boss of a struggling Forest side in the Championship cost around £1m, with the former Brighton boss having around a year on his deal remaining.

In came Steve Cooper, whose arrival cost £1.5m from Swansea City, although we aren’t including that here. But his exit from Forest in December 2023 cost the club, based on his two years remaining, around £3m.

The September sacking Nuno, whose relationship with Marinakis had soured towards the end of last season, will have cost the club around £6m based on remainder of deal and understood salary, with Postecoglou’s short reign seeing the club incur a severance hit of around £3.5m.

West Ham United (£8.5m – David Moyes, Julen Lopetegui, Graham Potter)

West Ham United head coach Graham Potter

When David Moyes departed the London Stadium at the end of the 2023/24 season it was agreed ahead of time.

Moyes, who had delivered European success to the Hammers through winning the UEFA Europa Conference League in June 2023, had seen his side endure struggles on the pitch in 2023/24, and it was announced that he would be leaving his position when his deal expired in May 2024. The result being no compensation due to the current Everton manager.

Lopetegui, Moyes’ replacement, left in January 2025 but had a pre-agreed clause in his deal that saw him entitled to around £3.5m should he be sacked, effectively 12 months pay.

Potter inked a two-and-a-half year deal in January, but with two years remaining, a payout of around £5m is understood to be the ballpark figure.

Newcastle United (£8m – Steve Bruce)

Steve Bruce looks on

Newcastle United’s change of ownership from the Mike Ashley era to the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund (PIF) back in late 2021 pretty much had the writing on the wall for Steve Bruce as soon as it was announced.

Bruce’s relationship with the Magpies fans had broken down, and with the PIF wanting to stamp their authority on the team and make a statement, the former Hull City, Birmingham City and Aston Villa boss was shown the door a fortnight after the new owners took over.

Bruce, whose managerial career has taken in spells at 13 clubs, did walk away well compensated, however, to the tune of some £8m.

Aston Villa (£7m – Dean Smith, Steven Gerrard)

Steven Gerrard

Dean Smith’s 2021 exit from Villa Park after he had been the man to return them to the Premier League football following a period in the Championship, would’ve cost Villa around £2m, it also paved the way for the expensive hiring of Steven Gerrard from Glasgow Rangers, with the Liverpool legend having been in situ as boss of the Scottish side, with £4.5m required to prize him away.

Gerrard left after 11 months. While the actual cost of his sacking wasn’t itemised in the accounts, the estimate was around £5m, with a pre-agreed severance of around 12 months pay likely.

Leeds United (£6.5m – Marcelo Bielsa, Jesse Marsch, Javi Gracia)

marcelo bielsa

When the popular Argentinian boss Marcelo Bielsa, the man who led Leeds back to the promised land of the Premier League in 2020, was handed his P45 in February of 2022 it was a decision that was not universally popular, such was the high regard he was held in by the Elland Road faithful.

The cost of his exit was detailed in Leeds’ accounts for 2021/22, with Bielsa receiving £3.5m in severance from the club. His successor, American Jesse Marsch, spent a year in charge before he was also shown the exit door. The 2022/23 accounts didn’t detail the cost of his exit in such detail, but industry estimates place the cost of his compensation at around £3m.

Javi Gracia arrived on a flexible contract and lasted 12 games, while Sam Allardyce took on a short-term stint in the dugout. Compensation was afforded to neither.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Anthony Smith Facing 20 Years in Prison After Arrest

Published

on

By


Former UFC fighter, Anthony Smith, has added his name to the list of recent UFC legal troubles as he was arrested in Nebraska on Monday night.

Smith had an up-and-down UFC career. Debuting in 2013, he lost his first fight to Antonio Braga Neto by submission and was subsequently let go by the company.

In 2016, Smith re-signed with the UFC, winning his first fight back against Leonardo Augusto Leleco by unanimous decision. Since then, he picked up wins over the likes of Rashad Evans and Maurício Rua.

Despite not winning a title in the company, his main event bout against Jon Jones at UFC 235 in 2019 for the championship was a standout of his career, even if he did fall short in his dreams of becoming light heavyweight champion.

Smith retired from the UFC in April of last year at UFC Kansas City. His bout against Mingyang Zhang ended in the first round by TKO due to the top of the former’s head being cut open. Not only did this mark his retirement, but also three consecutive losses in the sport.

The news of Smith’s recent arrest comes just weeks after ex-fighter Dustin Poirier‘s viral Atlanta airport arrest for public intoxication, in which the former lightweight has since publicly apologised for his actions and committed to a sobriety journey.

Why Anthony Smith Was Arrested

Anthony Smith UFC retirement fight

It was reported on Monday night by TMZ that Smith had been arrested by Sarpy County authorities in Nebraska on three alleged charges of domestic violence causing serious bodily harm, terroristic threats, and first-degree false imprisonment.

The charge of domestic violence alone carries a maximum sentence of 20 years imprisonment if convicted under Nebraskan law. Further comments on the incident have not yet been made by Smith or his team.

As legal proceedings begin, with Smith set to have a bond hearing today, his career outside the Octagon now remains uncertain, with the outcome of this case likely to shape the next chapter of the former light heavyweight challenger’s future.

Continue Reading

Sports

Gold Issues Tottenham Update After Fernandes ACL Injury Rumours

Published

on

By


Tottenham fans have been left worried by growing rumours of a serious injury to one of their star new signings over the last day or so. Excitement among Spurs fans is at a real high after a £237million spending bill that has seen the North London club sign the likes of Sandro Tonali, Mateus Fernandes and Jan Paul van Hecke among others.

Roberto De Zerbi is being backed like no Spurs boss before him, with the club commissioning a club-record spend so far this summer, and it’s expected the spending will continue, leading to an attacking signing or two between now and the end of the window in early September.

In the meantime, Tottenham are currently working on their fitness with pre-season preparations in Australia, specifically in Sydney, and De Zerbi is putting the players through their paces, which will come as no surprise given the fitness demands of the way his teams play the game.

Tottenham’s Mateus Fernandes injury fears eased

West Ham United's Mateus Fernandes celebrates scoring vs Sunderland via Reuters

After footage emerged of Fernandes sitting out a training session in Australia, fans began to speculate that he might have an injury, and those rumours quickly graduated to talk of a serious injury like an ACL rupture. But according to Alasdair Gold of Football.London, the rumours are unfounded, and there is no concern over a serious injury.

Fernandes is expected to sit out Tottenham’s next pre-season friendly, according to the report, but it part of De Zerbi requiring a high workload of the players who were part of the initial pre-season group, which excluded the World Cup participants.

The hard work required of those players early on has meant the club has had to monitor their fitness levels closely, and those in danger of being overworked, or indeed those with some early summer niggles, will sit out sessions, or even games, to avoid any true risk of a significant injury. Clearly, De Zerbi values the hard work in training more than the pre-season games, and it will be interesting to see what results are yielded, given the injury troubles Tottenham have had over the last couple of years.

But De Zerbi wants fitter and faster, and that’s not an easy process for players during a hard, and usually hot, pre-season. The good news for Spurs fans is that Fernandes appears to be fine.

Reality check for Spurs players

West Ham United midfielder Mateus Fernandes celebrates scoring Premier League goal against Sunderland via Reuters

Many Tottenham players have spoken about the ambition shown by De Zerbi about this Spurs project, and even Fernandes himself said when signing: “I spoke with the manager. I think he was the main key for me to join Tottenham and the project. The way he spoke with me, with my family, it was very special… it made the decision easy.”

But they are now realising the hard work required to reach the standards of the Italian boss, and that playing within some styles of play require an elite level of fitness that simply does not come without a relentless training block.

Continue Reading

Sports

FIFA React After Lawmakers Say Embolo Shouldn’t Have Seen Red v Argentina

Published

on

By


The 2026 World Cup will go down as one of the most controversial in history and FIFA have been dealing with immense criticism.

Conspiracy theories, contentious refereeing decisions, the suspension of a red card ban and a brawl after a disappointing final marred the greatest tournament in football. Spain became champions, dethroning Argentina, whom the sporting body were accused of trying to ensure remained in the competition for as long as possible.

La Abiceleste’s journey to the final took many twists and turns, which included a drama-filled comeback victory over Egypt. They also beat Switzerland in the quarter-finals, taking advantage of Breel Embolo’s second-half sending off.

IFAB Claim Embolo Sending Off Incorrect

Breel Embolo vs Argentina Denny Medley (IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters)

Argentina won 3-1 against the Swiss courtesy of goals from Alexis Mac Allister (10′), Julian Alvarez (112′), and Lautaro Martinez (120+1′). Their two extra-time goals came after Embolo’s red card in the 72nd minute and at that time the European nation were largely the better team.

Embolo received his marching orders after VAR opted to overturn Portuguese referee Joao Pinheiro’s on-field decision. He initially ruled that Leandro Parades had fouled the Rennes forward, but VAR stepped in and deemed that there was no contact and handed the player a second yellow card for simulation.

A mistaken identity rule was used to send Embolo off and led to huge backlash, including from Switzerland manager Murat Yakin. He said that it “destroyed our game.” Others in the sport hit out at the ruling and two weeks later the IFAB (International Football Association Board) gave their verdict.

The IFAB released a statement this week and insisted that a yellow card “can only be reviewed to identify the player who committed the offence that was penalised.” The football lawmakers claim that although the use of the mistaken identity clause to deal with simulation was “well received” during the World Cup, it will not be used “until a review is concluded.”

This wasn’t the only occasion the mistaken identity clause had been used during the tournament. Tim Ream had a yellow card rescinded after VAR alerted referee Danny Makkelie that the wrong player had been penalised for an offense in the USA’s 4-1 win over Paraguay during the group stage.

The booking was transferred to Miguel Almiron instead after Makkelie rewatched the incident on the pitchside monitor. The IFAB’s statement confirms that, technically, both uses of the clause were incorrect because neither player committed the same foul.

World Cup History Quiz

You scored

out of 20

‘Cannot be Disputed’ – FIFA Respond to IFAB

FIFA president Gianni Infantino during a World Cup press conference FIFA president Gianni Infantino via REUTERS/Gareth Bumstead

FIFA have now responded to the IFAB and strongly defended their interpretation of the mistaken identity clause. On X, their FIFA Media account wrote:

“FIFA’s interpretation of Mistaken Identity was consistently applied during the FIFA World Cup. There were two instances in which a player was mistakenly identified as having committed a yellow card offence and the VAR advised the referee to correct the factual error caused by the opponent’s simulation. The simulation itself cannot be disputed and it should not result in a disciplinary sanction against an opponent that may then lead to further consequences, such as a sending off for a second yellow card or a match suspension for accumulated cautions.”

They added: “We do not consider this to have been a referee or VAR error and the decision restored justice. We note IFAB’s comments in its Circular, we have been in contact with them throughout and they confirmed that this interpretation is valid, that it was well received and that it will form part of the discussion on revisions to the VAR Protocol, as discussed at the last AGM.”

The main issue surrounding the use of the clause is the wording of the existing protocol and is set to lead to further discussions about VAR’s scope for intervening in simulation cases. The standard of refereeing became a major talking point throughout the tournament, as did FIFA’s handling of big calls.

Embolo’s wasn’t even the biggest controversy to take place at the World Cup. FIFA’s decision to suspend Folarin Balogun’s one-game ban for a sending off in the USA’s Round of 32 win over Bosnia and Herzegoniva came after influence from the White House.

Continue Reading

Trending